First Application to British Arts Counci

First Application to British Arts Council

 
 Dear Sir/Madam ……………………………….. Your Ref. LACBR 12044/Doc.5

You may remember that I wrote to you over a year ago requesting that I might take advantage of the many literary grants being offered to literary grant abusers, I do beg your pardon applicants  by the literature and arts council board of review to have all my posts to the Front Nationale guestbook published in hard copy book form.

I did explicitly express a desire that I would like to retain photographic jurisdiction of the pictorial content of the front cover. If my memory serves me right I also alerted you at the time I was still agonising over a stylised drawing of a Halal Butchers shop or a recent photo of Plunkit sitting at the wheel of one of his Jags.

You may also like to peruse your archival records to establish that at the same time I also requested a first edition, gold bound copy be presented to a Mr Tony Bliar preferably BEFORE his consigns this wonderful country of ours and its indigenous peoples to the smoking dung heap.

I apologise unreservedly for this late alteration but I have since had a change of mind on the pictorial choice of the front cover and have found a wonderful Reuters press photograph of a large gang of Asian youths attacking a lone white boy.

I feel that this graphic photo conveys a much more realistic visual impact for the revised front cover and would be far more appreciated by our readers and easily recognisable as an important signpost mirroring our contempory English society as we see it today and I am sure you and the full board will concur unanimously with this very important but essential late change. (See attachment)

Unfortunately as I have not heard from you I can only assume there might be some reluctance on your part to look favourably on my application no doubt because of the financial restraints involved in the cost of this gold bound special first edition collectors masterpiece personally signed by it’s author that I had requested be gifted without prejudice to a Mr Tony Bliar.

I do fully understand and sympathise with your reticence concerning the financial limitations and constraints placed upon the Arts Council particularly when our government has to contribute about ₤1.2 Million an hour for our governments future re-location to Belgium and eventually like a nervous naïve virgin delivered into the arms of a waiting corrupt EUSSR dictatorship.

In retrospect I wonder if I might apply for an alternative grant being offered to the oppressed and racially disadvantaged groups within our society of which I am a member, for a place at Peterborough University to enable me to complete a course in advanced Social Studies for my PhD.

I would like to research my thesis entitled “THE RISE, DECLINE AND EVENTUAL DEATH OF A SOVEREIGN NATION” I feel this would rate as important a social document of our countries history as was the Magna Carta, I am sure you can appreciate the subtlety I am trying to convey here i.e. ‘the birth of a nation and the death of a nation’?

I eagerly await a fortuitous reply,

PS. If this second application is unsuccessful, I don’t suppose there would be any chance of any further grants on offer that I can apply for, i.e., bush meat cuisine guaranteed to surprise and delight your friends or even mixed evening classes debating the mental anguish, frustrations and the racist marginalisation experienced by coloured immigrant child rapists and cannibals.

http://i60.tinypic.com/detytw.jpg


Albion. ………………….. AHW ♫151♣ SD 0104/ UP/ BNP

Attachment as mentioned above. The newly revised front cover.

Failings of the United Nations Organization

 

Failings of the United Nations Organization

Since its creation, there has been controversy and criticism of the United Nations Organization. In the United States, an early opponent of the UN was the John Birch Society, which began a "get US out of the UN" campaign and even as far back as 1959, charging that the UN's aim was to establish a "One World Government."

The United Nations was established in 1945 to maintain international peace and promote cooperation in solving international economic, social and humanitarian problems. Well its charter does not include taking sides and carving up the spoils in a number of nasty wars, and picking and choosing what human rights it might or might not champion.

De Gaulle criticized the UN, famously calling it le machin ("the thingie"), an apt name.

There are 5 permanent members – China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States and it allows a permanent member to block adoption but not to block the debate of a resolution unacceptable to it.

China blocks adoptions concerning sanctions against Iran and on the sending of UN peacekeepers to the Sudan as both countries supply their oil needs, but does agree to sending in an African Union contingent to the Sudan who could not even afford bullets and who stood on the sidelines like spectators at a girls basketball match and did nothing to stop the genocide by the government sponsored Janjaweed. They also block meaningful sanctions against North Korea and get belligerent over any debate on their invasion of Tibet.

The ethnic cleansing of the Burmese Karen people by the Burmese generals has been going on for years; problem is Burma supplies China with oil. The UN looks the other way.

Apart from Russia no western country was critical of the bombing of Serbia and the annexation of part of that country which was handed over by the victors, the US and the British, to form a new Muslim country called Kosovo. Another warring conflict ended in a similar land grab in the Sudetenland 92 years preciously. Perhaps Serbia had seen the writing on the wall.

United Nations Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
This Human rights declaration is a complete fiasco. This declaration is criminally ignored where European indigenous people rights are concerned. This declaration emphasizes without any pre-conditions the rights of indigenous peoples to maintain and strengthen their own institutions, cultures and traditions and to pursue their development in keeping with their own needs and aspirations. The overpowering of their societies by deliberate, calculated swamping of its countries is meant to frustrate this. Thus this declaration is negated.

The Government of the United Kingdom, who is a signatory to this declaration, openly and criminally ignores and even threatens its people with incarceration who wish to maintain and strengthen their own institutions, cultures and traditions and to pursue their development in keeping with their own needs and aspirations.

On the contrary it blatantly attempts to weaken and destroy the indigenous people’s pursuit to maintain their own needs, identities and aspirations and even forms government Quango’s for that sole purpose.

Not only do they ignore these basic human rights, they are even attempting to deny an indigenous race exist at all in the UK. This high sounding, moralistic human rights nonsense failed the people of Tibet, the Sudan, Burma and Serbia miserably, but they were not super powers were they. There was no call for sanctions when the coalition of the willing illegally invaded Iraq which was NOT a UN initiative, but over a million Iraqi civilians have paid dearly with their lives and who are still dying because of this discrimination by the UN.

It is imperative that the idea of the formation of a United Nationalist Nations (UNN) is formed without delay to act as a real watchdog for the rights of Indigenous Peoples worldwide, performing the duty that the UN refuses to accept or just ignores. Like the UN it should not be a political party or seen to be a political party or have any political affiliations. It should be formed as a world-wide organization with its own Ambassador and representatives.

It might well be that in 1959 the John Birch society got it right when they said that the UN's aim was to establish a "One World Government." It could be part of an enormous jigsaw aimed at slowly over time forming a one world government. Common Purpose, another part of this complex jigsaw tries to hide its ‘purpose’ behind its charity status. It declares it offers inspirations, knowledge and connections, leadership and development skills and I am sure they do, but why its courses are conducted under Chatham House rules completely escapes me, what have they got to hide?

Common Purpose was founded in 1988 by Julia Middleton. She is also the CEO of CP. She was tutored at the London School of Economics, a hotbed of rabid socialism and Marxism; many of its past graduates are now working within politics. A number of senior BBC staff are LSE educated and graduates of CP courses. Incidentally The LSE was founded by the Fabians Society.

There is enough proof that the day the NWO is a reality Common Purpose will take over the reigns of the civil service. Its tentacles spread large and wide and no doubt it has connections already within the Judiciary, higher echelons of the British police, media, and senior representatives of the existing civil service. Robert Peston, BBC Business Editor, said of Julia: “One of Middleton's great skills is to persuade police constables, youth group organisers, permanent secretaries, FTSE chief executives and head teachers that they can learn from each other and could even cure some of society's ills.” In preparation for what purpose I ask.

The purpose of the UNN should be to alert the world to the plight of indigenous people around the world, including European people, where the sheer overwhelming weight of immigrant numbers will in time assure the displacement and fragmentation of their people and their cultures. The UNN should fill the void where the UN has failed to protect the rights of the indigenous people around the world.

Our successive governments cannot justify turning its back on the rights of the indigenous peoples with the poor excuse that ‘celebrating our traditions and wanting to be recognised as the indigenous group of these islands might provoke and offend the sensitivities of alien people of alien cultures’ That is treason.

We cannot even begin to understand the terminal sickness affecting the Western Nations until we understand WHY this is happening.

Two years on from writing this article the UN Security Council have stood by while two of their voting members Russia and China have vetoed moves by the UN to institute a no-fly zone and to put peacekeeping troops on the ground in Syria to stop the slaughter of civilians that at present total approx. 15,000 civilians.

Regardless who are the aggressors, freedom fighters or terrorists thousands of innocent civilians are being systematically murdered. These two Security Council members use their veto not because of humanitarian reasons but Syria is Russia’s largests arms  buyer and China’s veto ensures continuous uninterrupted supplies of oil from Syria for their growing economy. Let us remind ourselves of Article One of the UN Charter.

The UN Charter states

The Purposes of the United Nations are:
1. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;

This is Article One and it is totally MEANINGLESS, The Genocide in South Africa is also being ignored.

Marxist Dogma. Nation States are yesterday’s mistakes.

Marxist Dogma. Nation States are yesterday’s mistakes.


A RED RAG TO A MARXIST, “I PROCLAIM THIS TO BE MY COUNTRY”.
Resplendent in their blue helmets driving their brand new white 4 wheel drive vehicles, paid for by the tax payers subscriptions of the wealthy First World, these saviours from the Free World survey the unpaved, muddy streets of a decaying third world country in crisis. One could ask where they were when over 200,000 females including children were being raped by soldiers in the festering Republic of the Congo, or markedly absent during the mass rape and killing of its own people by the Sudanese government.

Who turned a blind eye when the coalition of the willing tore Iraq apart?

One of our criminal leaders said, quote “At the time I thought it was the right thing to do” and in collusion with others who also thought “it was the right thing to do” hundreds of thousands of non-military Iraqi’s have paid, and are still paying with their lives for a weasel of a man’s blithe assumption it was the right thing to do. A two faced traitor who after being hugely successful in helping to destroy the social fabric of the United Kingdom solely as means of holding on to political power was also instrumental in the death of hundreds of thousands of civilians of a foreign sovereign state.

The UN is NOT a vehicle for the unifying nations but a venue for talk-fests by fragmented blocs formed by groups within the UN for the purpose of self interest. China has a seat on the security council, they also rely heavily on oil from the African countries and they use their veto against UN intervention in crisis in their areas of economic interests. Why didn’t the UN human rights committee question China’s invasion of Tibet but was quick to criticise Israel’s response when the Marvi Marmara, with the approval of the Turkish Government, tried to run the blockade of Gaza. There is the South American bloc including Cuba whose self interest is against the devil incarnate, America.

As I wrote in an earlier article in the United States, an early opponent of the United Nations was the John Birch Society, which began a "get US out of the UN" campaign and even as far back as 1959, charging that the United Nations aim was to establish a "One World Government."

It comes as no surprise when walking around our towns and cities we hear a preponderance of languages spoken by European peoples. This is understandable because when we surrendered our sovereignty to Europe, which was agreed upon in one of the myriad of treaties our leaders have signed and in which our people had no say, treaties which were countersigned by our Queen, we were also required to surrender our borders and justice system. Fair enough you might say.

But from which European country did the African or people from the entire Indian subcontinent, the Caribbean, Middle East or the representatives of the army of Islam originate from who like Locusts are now ferociously displacing the ethnic people of this country? This is easily explained. We go back to the UN. If a One Order is the ultimate aim it follows it does not concern the UN to encourage primitive peoples and cultures to dilute more advanced cultures.

Many years ago the Australian Prime Minister Mr Menzies realised Australia had to populate or perish. Post WW2 his government encouraged British people to immigrate to Australia. When that source dried up many European peoples began arriving. The United Nations then vigorously criticised what they regarded as Australia’s ‘White Australia’ policy, but what they were criticising in truth was not the ‘White Australia' policy but the then Mono-Culture of Australia, the European culture. A One Global Order CANNOT EXIST alongside an array of rich mono cultures.

In many Australian cities there are Vietnamese, Islamic and African enclaves. One short term senator predicted the Asianisation of Australia. Watch any Australian news clip, documentary, drama, or advert and one realises her prediction was correct, tokenism is rampant and obvious, but her maiden speech in Parliament sent the Liberals into a saliva dripping frenzy and she was crucified.

I am firmly convinced there is a concerted effort within the UN by the use of pressure to shame affluent western countries to take more and more third world refugees regardless of the terrible upsurge in crime social, and cultural damage it is causing within these once civilised societies.

Civilised Western governments should inform the UN in no uncertain terms that first world sovereign nations refuse to be pressurised any longer or shamed by silk suited, highly paid face-less non entities sitting in the rarefied atmosphere of glass and concrete towers inviting third world savages whose primitive and superstitious stone age cultures are so frighteningly alien to ours and whose voracious appetite to procreate during feasts or famines by the reckless use of the womb will one day destroy the west.

The West IS being systematically destroyed. Saudi Arabia, China, Japan, Dubai, Libya, Iran are NOT pressurised to take African, Pakistani, Caribbean, Bangladeshi or oriental refugees, only Europe. The United Nations, like the EU is part of drive for a New order. A new order is the Marxist dream.

This can only be appreciated if one understands what is taking place in the world today, and it is very, very complex indeed and rarely understood by the dumb peasantry who are fed a rich diet of undisguised utter trash laughingly offered up as adult entertainment and receive news from completely unreliable, politically biased sources depending on the newspapers owners political colour and the political party in power at the time. There are many very powerful and influential players in this world shape shifting game.

So I ask are we, the descendants of our Anglo-Saxon forefathers, any different? Hundreds of thousands of European German people in Nuremburg Square were hypnotised by a little uniformed gentleman with a small moustache and sporting a terrible haircut. We too are being hymotised by lies, lies and more lies by a Statist Government and its attendant media. We all spawn from an ethnic European culture; we have magnificent histories, why should we NOT we duped by the creeping creation of a New Order. The difference here is this New Order is not Nationalist driven but Marxist driven.

In the United Kingdom the simple public pronouncement “I PROCLAIM THIS TO BE MY COUNTRY OF ETHNICITY” is now considered a racist comment due to one of many European Directives we are now governed by, and that comment can possibly attract jail time in one of Her Majesties prisons.

Wake up people, just how much freedom of speech are you prepared to sacrifice. You need only look around you to see who is your enemy is and the disgusting and dangerous state our country has been reduced to, you do not have to be brain-dead to see what your enemy has already done to you and your country with your tacit approval at the ballot box.

With regular monotony the devastated parents, sisters and girl friends stand, heads bowed, sob quietly as yet another funeral cortège with the Union Flag draped over the coffins of their loved ones slowly wends its way through the sombre streets of Wootton Bassett. The bitter irony is that the establishment would have you believe the enemy is the British National Party.

The Loss of Childhood Innocence.

 

The Loss of Childhood Innocence.   The story leaked out that at the young mothers meeting one of the expectant mothers was informed by the hospital after a routine scan that her yet  unborn baby was going to be a girl. Another mother inquired if she had she picked a name for her new baby. She smiled mischievously and said she and her husband had plumped for Aisha. She was asked if under the bizarre circumstances existing in the UK if  that was wise thing to do.

This conversation has been monitored closely by an undercover Stasi State Operative posing as a work experience person at the children’s nursery who quickly alerted the local EU Racial and Thought Police on her mobile. You will be relieved to know the State Police arrived within 2 minutes of the call.

 It was later discovered this mother had already been in trouble with the Stasi State Police (SSP) after she informed the Day-Care authorities that her child was not particularly fond of Halal prepared food. The mother is now serving 3 months in a re-education camp situated on the Isle of Skye. Meanwhile her other three children have also been placed in care of a state re-education institution for Minors of repeat racial offenders.

This came on top of a disturbing revelation that this same Day-Care establishment had recently made history after a 5 year old was carted off after she was overheard to say she much preferred white smarties to black ones. She was later released into her mothers care but with a caution. The Judge ordered neither the 5 year olds identity to be made public nor the charge to be placed on a criminal record as it was her first offence; she was however placed on a good behaviour bond.

The Chief Constable Sir Yausaf Malik said these incidences are becoming more and more common and the State Police will be instituting zero tolerance for crimes of a racist nature. He added these incidences have been getting quite bizarre of late, referring to an Oldham man Mr Bertie Tomkins, who was arrested outside MacDonald’s after ordering a Halal Bacon Sandwich. He had attempted to flee the scene but was apprehended by a Lady Policeman Constable Patel using her Taser.

The offender asked the judge for leniency pleading he did not order the sandwich for himself but for his Asian neighbour, he added he had also been sexually abused as a child and was deeply remorseful for his actions. The Judge was not amused. He will be reappearing before Lord Justice Singh for contempt of court.

Now you might think this tale somewhat far fetched but the facts below speak for themselves and I would be extremely worried for my children’s future, a future reminiscent of the future a Mr Orwell wrote about at length. This little tale is in fact reality, it is happening right now because the placid ‘Sheepy People’ have allowed it to happen.

I should point out to overseas readers that the UK’s Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000 which was drawn up in Das Reich-Kapital in Bruges which compels all English public authorities, including schools and churches, to monitor children and log the details of racist abuse incidents on to databases.

It was revealed by a Ms. Munira Mirza that at present this database contains the details of “MORE THAN A QUARTER OF A MILLION ENGLISH CHILDREN who have been accused of racism since it became law.” Ms. Munira Mirza (₤82,000 P.A), is an Indian lady living in the UK, temporarily I hope, who was shoe-horned into the position as a senior advisor to London Mayor Boris Johnson to help plan, celebrate and comment on Great Britain’s exciting, vibrant, colourful diversity. The one and only criteria for this position as a racist advisor was the applicant should be coloured and not be from these isles.

It appears she has never actually enjoyed any meaningful work before or since leaving Oxford University in 1999 but did leave with PhD in Sociology, or the advanced study of Marxist principles. Her objective as an alien resident is to push the spectre of Multi-culti in this country.

One commentator said the definition of racism can be taken too far, especially with young children who clearly don’t understand the connotation behind the words.” Very observant person I must say!

The shocking statistic, indicative of the madness to which political correctness has sunk under the labour-Tory-Lib Dem insanity, emerged in Freedom of Information replies obtained by the Manifesto club, a left-leaning Socialist civil liberties group.

It has also been revealed that N.U.T. Marxist inspired and indoctrinated teachers in the United Kingdom have been turning in primary and nursery school children as young as three to local authorities for alleged “racist” remarks…..I would like to add it would come as no surprise to me to hear teachers had encouraged children to inform on their little classmates if they overhear any perceived racist comments.

Book burning is another heinous crime the presidium in Bruges is now considering being made legal throughout the Marxist bloc.

So can we say the new bogeyman is not the Heretic the Witch or the Narnsey but the child racist?...... Oh how I love inquisitions! Where’s the kindling?

Fritz Gerlich, a journalist who warned the German people of the dangers of Adolf Hitler in the early 1930s, wrote, “the worst thing we can do, the absolute worst, is to do nothing.” 
 
Our whole rotten, decaying system in this country needs dismantling. The politicians who have deliberately allowed this country to get to this vile state need to be put on trial. The people who have taken us into illegal wars and who are indirectly responsible for the deaths of over 300 of our young men, need to be put on trial. Do not let us forget the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi and Afghani civilians including babies that have also been slaughtered.

We have ceased be a democracy. Whatever system we are being ruled by it has been totally corrupted, divisive and extremely dangerous. This monstrous, Marxist edifice that masquerades as a democracy that has changed the face and character of these islands forever by threat, intimidation and legislation, has to be destroyed. At this very moment in time we have a chance to put things right, if we do not then WE the people are choosing the bleak future for our children. Time is NOT on our side


http://tinyurl.com/ylkg3am

Who are our own people?

 

Who are our own people?

A while ago there was “intense debate” concerning a rumour, allegation, call it what you will, of members of the armed forces being quizzed as to whether they would fire on their “own people” I remember one comment out of many that was from an ex-serviceman who said it does not work that way in the army. I would be inclined to agree.

The first time I read of this disturbing allegation was on the Green Arrow site posted by a regular contributor, a person whose I would not dismiss lightly. He was told of this by a colleague of his who was a member of the armed forces. In this once green and pleasant land nothing, and I mean nothing, would be too bizarre for me to believe or disbelieve.

The ex-serviceman who commented “It does not work this way” was probably an ex-serviceman like myself, who served in the Military Forces well before welcome diversity and cultural enrichment which was forcibly inflicted on the UK population, long before the bizarre situation that exists today in the UK and could not possibly be foreseen.

The question, put to some members of the armed forces, if it was raised at all, was would you fire on your “own” people? It was not worded that serious action might be taken against a named ethnic group in the event of serious political insurrection, with the possibility that the army would give orders to shoot, because if they did all hell would break loose.

Our government have perfected the art of deception. So shooting “our own” people is Orwellian correct speak and conceals the truth.

Just to refresh your memories the report goes on. In a stunning conversation with a friend, who is a serving member of the Armed Forces, over the weekend, it was revealed that transfers to regiments and other units in the UK on home duties are being undertaken by the MOD based upon whether an individual was prepared to 'open fire' on UK citizens during civil disturbances.

The report continues I found this long and extracted conversation to be both bizarre and frightening. I will state at this point that he is someone that I have known for years, and trust implicitly. The fact that service personnel are actually being asked in special briefing sessions whether they would fire on their own nationals indicates that the rumours about the Army being put on standby are indeed very true.

Let us examine this story a little closer. If it were true, what would prompt the civil contingencies act/ martial law being implemented? Well it does not take an Einstein to see what's coming; it is not if, but when. Now the question here is who are “our own” people?

One might say all the people who live in this country which includes millions of asylum seekers, third world immigrants, legal or otherwise, and economic refugees all of who could fall into this category. People native to these islands might say well it’s pretty obvious; our own people are native born Britons.

What group of people in our society would be such a threat to national security as to cause the government to invoke the civil contingencies act? It is NOT “our people”.

What disturbingly large group of immigrants with a lot of political muscle and huge overseas funding and whom our government are terrified of offending, could threaten the security of this country? What group of people have publicly stated they would like to see Sharia Law implemented right across the country with one rabid Islamic preacher even saying they will not be satisfied until the Crescent flag is flying over Westminster?

France has over 5 million followers of Islam we have roughly 2 million. Their numbers are increasing at rate that by the end of this century there is a strong possibility the UK could be looking at partition.

I predict that one day before the end of this century when the enemy do not get what they want we will have to confront the situation in our country that we see in Pakistan and Afghanistan today, with suicide bombers and ISD’s commonplace in our country.

Already there are many parts of our towns where you will be warned by the residents that you are now entering a Moslem area. A while ago even one of our politicians was cautioned that he had entered an Asian area. This nightmarish event took place in OUR country.

Why the police, when confronted by these primitive desert people, advance backwards is not that they are cowards, but because this is the tactic the Chief Constables are ordered to adopt from the Home Office and then passed down to the officers and men.

In the not too distant future the numbers these people would be capable of bringing onto the streets the police would have no chance of controlling. Once this gets out of hand with looting burning and killing then the police might be faced with no option but to fire on its “own people”

I believe the order is not to shoot English people as they will not be the one’s who will be creating a Pakistan/Iraqi/Afghanistan situation in this country in the future.

Did not a “British” MP threaten to bring 10,000 members of his primitive eastern religious cult on our streets if a foreign politician who was invited into this country, was allowed in? What did our brave government do, it backed down.

A trigger could be action against Iran because of their nuclear ambitions then a full scale jihad will commence against the West, then this scenario would not be beyond the realms of Hollywood disaster movie fiction.

I can walk through any city, town, village or hamlet and I can instantly recognise “my own” people. The authority’s interpretation of “our own” people is something completely different. So shooting ones “own people” can mean different things to different people.

The Intelligence services including MI6 are at the moment keeping watch on 3000 terrorist sleepers in OUR country, what worries me is the 3000 and first terrorist with bomb making facilities they DON’T know about.

http://tinyurl.com/agu9r6

Letter from Kabul.

Letter from Kabul.

A formal request by the Al Qaeda network in the Yemen has been received by her Majesties Government for permission to move their headquarters from North Yemen to a recently disbanded 800 year old Anglican church in Walthamstow.

Their application has received the full backing and support of the Somalia’s Al-Shabab, the Muslim Brotherhood and Indonesia’s Jemaah Islamiya terror group.

Reasons given for this urgent request are a blatant, ongoing infringement of human rights violation caused by American drones continually overflying and bombing Al Qaeda training camps and generally harassing and making life an abject misery for their operatives and interfering with the continuity of training. The application was forwarded to London via the ECHR at The Hague.

The UNCHR has also expressed disquiet at the relentless bombing of these training camps by the Americans which have also resulted in the deaths of a couple of innocent civilians.

Initially the application has appeared to have been met with warm approval from HM. Government however before a decision can be finalised advice is being sought from senior representatives of the various Moslem extremist groups based within the UK for their input.

It was pointed out if the application were to be successful there will be a twofold advantage of this relocation in that it would enable Al Qaeda to be closer to their fund raising offices, which have always been traditionally based in Central London, and secondly the move would mean it would be far more cost effective to recruit potential terrorists already residing in the UK rather than to fly them out to the Yemen and Pakistan for initial interviews, which has been the normal procedure in the past, only to find they do not meet the necessary criteria.

A senior human rights lawyer from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) at The Hague pointed out a precedent had already been set by the recognition by Her Majesties Government of the terrorist organization Hizb ut-Tahrir group which in contrast has been proscribed as a terrorist group in the USA.

Both France and the USA are concerned that London boasts the envious reputation of the world's premier money-laundry for terrorism. A home office spokesperson confided to our reporter that with Al Qaeda’s request to relocate to the UK, whilst at first glance a move that might sound somewhat controversial even provocative, it does makes a lot of sense and could create a great deal of financial benefit for Great Britain’s Sharia Islamic banks.

The Muslim Council of Britain and other organisations and individuals who support Islamic extremism and who are currently being wooed by Whitehall said they would be delighted with the relocation of Al Qaeda to Great Britain.

Meanwhile President Hussein Obama has promised another surge of 200,000 American troops to Afghanistan to help protect the valuable heroin crop, a financial source that helps fund the war and to maintain the rich lifestyle of the ruling elite in Afghanistan but more importantly to protect the proposed Trans Afghanistan Pipeline (TAPI) from Turkmenistan to India pre-empting any problems that will arise with the severe shortage of oil in the near future, a race that both the West and oil hungry China have huge stakes in pursuing at all costs

from our reporter in Kabul.

http://tinyurl.com/y9984bx

EU has been placed in receivership.

EU has been placed in receivership.

I see the EU has been placed in receivership.

You’re kidding!

I most certainly am not. I fully understand your reluctance to give any credence to this information as I have in the past been accused of resorting to childish exaggeration.

What caused it?

Well you see it’s complicated. You can liken it to the American financial crash with Fannie Mae, Lehman Brothers, Bear Sterns and Freddie Mac imploding.

Don’t see it, what’s the comparison?

Well much of the EU member countries tax payer’s money disappeared as swiftly as a UK politician ducking for cover when being questioned about abuse of expenses and second house mortgages, or caught with his trousers down by his ankles in a public toilet for no good reason. The financial breakdown was further exacerbated as a result of MEP’s awarding themselves huge salaries in the 6 figure range and expenses that would keep a dozen pensioners fed for hundreds of years.

They spent millions on first class air travel home and spent lavishly on 5 star hotels. They gave millions of Euro’s to third world countries, like Moldova, Slovakia, Romania and are building a massive underground rail system, and an international airport at Riga. Plans are already in operation to implement a space programme for Latvia.

I have it on good authority the European Particle accelerator which so far cost $790 million blew a fuse on switch-on and hasn’t worked since. So any handy person out there; well what a golden opportunity!

This reckless spending resulted in turning these poor countries into first world countries, and at the same time buggered up the finances of the first world member countries who in turn paid the bulk of the membership fees. Oh and a number of the EU's most senior ministers have hurriedly fled into exile to Argentina.

Have any assets been confiscated?

Well if you are quick there is a sale of EU commission limousines, some office furniture and stacks of flag poles and nondescript flags that flew outside of the EU Commission building, and a hideous water feature that stands near the main entrance.

I think there might even be a statue of Nelson Mandela too.

Oh and a primitif painting of a duck floating on a yellow pond hanging in the main foyer reputedly costing 20 Million Euro’s.

Other strange things are happening. Brussels itself is going broke; few planes are arriving into the country so the airport authorities have opened up the old WW2 grass airstrip off the main runway and the Belgium government have resorted to using its aging fleet of Dakotas for international flights. NATO, the BBC EU Liaison department and Race Relation’s Industry have put their offices on the market.

Oh, and their space programme department have for sale a half dozen slightly used rockets. You will find them on EBay.

Really?

Oh yes, it doesn’t end there. The railway line between Brussels and Strasbourg which every month did a full scale removal of all EU paperwork encompassing the process of government hasn’t seen a train for over a week. There is talk to help recoup some of the money they are going to sell that part of the railway system to a non-profit railway enthusiast preservation group.

Belgium will be financially destitute and will have to rely once again on selling Chocolates, Beer and Sprouts for survival.

Rumour has it Brussels is also up for sale.

The high class tailors in the city haven’t had any orders for over a week, the restaurants are going broke and the red light in the red light district has gone out and the working girls have stopped working..... if you understand my meaning.


I believe there is a huge pall of smoke at the back of the EU Commission’s building.

Arson?

Don’t think so, I believe they are hurriedly burning all the EU financial accounts for the last 12 years.

Its serious then?

Well not really actually.

How come?

Well it appears an enormous unforeseen side benefit of all this madness and mayhem is that all member countries can now return to some semblance of self government, control of their own borders, return to some form of democracy and freedom of speech and dare I say it bloody sanity. Good innit?