I had a dream....

I had a dream.... Court Round-up.…. Snaresbrook Magistrate’s Court


After the opening address by Mr Bliars legal team defending him on the charge of Treason, one of Mr Bliars defence team, a QC Dudley Caruthers was questioned on the steps of the court today as to Mr Bliars mental state.


When questioned on his clients erratic behaviour he said it was originally thought his client may have been suffering from delusions of grandeur and compulsive lying, but continually emphasised and stressed to the waiting reporters that his client was deeply remorseful for “F*****G the country up”…….. his clients words, not your reporters.


The condition of the bail application was that Mr Bliar must agree to shock treatment and be electronically tagged as he is a continuing danger to English society; a frontal lobotomy is not out of the question. Q.C. Caruthers added he was pleased with the granting of the bail application thus enabling his client to partake in this years much awaited forthcoming Anglo/Asian multicultural awareness week and the chance to participate in this years festival of the ‘Sights and Smells of Old Asia’ being held in Bradford later this year.


Q.C. Caruthers hastened to add he believed a similar festival is being planned for a Somalian night in Peterborough where the public will experience a cultural feast of celebrations and fireworks, exotic examples of bush meat cuisine and tribal dancing.


One wag was overheard to say sarcastically, at the same time rolling his eyes to the heavens, “Oh Yeah! s’pose that will include female circumcision demo’s and ritual killings to appease the Gods” He was subdued by a taser and was last seen ashen-faced, stunned, being roughly handcuffed and led away by undercover plain clothes officers of the EUssr’s South West Regional division of the Diversity and Anti Multiracial Thought Police.


The Archbishop of York Minster, a Ugandan Mugami Sentamu, will officiate and hopefully introduce a team of African Kikuyu dancers, the same dancers that celebrated his enthronement as the Archbishop of York Minster, these dancers will dance the Bwola, an African dance of rejoicing and thanksgiving. Rumour has it, and as a timely warning, we believe that for the first time Baroness Scotland will also be appearing as one of the topless native female dancers.

It is also rumoured that Cherie the PM’s wife will NOT be attending any of these cultural enriching celebrations as she has been desperately searching for properties in the Bahamas with the help of an Australian property salesman for her and her husband to escape to when Great Britain and its indigenous peoples start sinking into a seething morass of life in a violent, stinking, smoking, rancid cesspit; …………..your reporters words………….. not Cherie’s.

Armies of the Genie

Armies of the Genie

The firmly entrenched political parties in Great Britain are determined that any form or signs of Nationalism or Patriotism that attempt to arise from the compliant masses in this country, but do already exist in countries like Israel, Japan, China or a host of other countries, must not be allowed to gain a foothold, that is precisely why Nationalism is always equated to Nazi-ism, the far right and white supremacy.

We have been set on a path where at its final destination there is no place for any racial or ethnic differences to exist. If this means re-writing or editing this country’s unique history or the deliberate blurring of the ethnic identity of the people who are native to these island and instilling guilt in those people who tacitly take for granted what is divinely and rightfully theirs, which is their birthright, then so be it. Have you ever wondered why it is there is no place on any government forms to state you are English?

The Final Solution for the whole of Europe is being played out in Brussels, The Hague, Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Strasbourg, Luxembourg and Geneva and its nightmarish effect will one day encompass all the nations of Europe.

The day will come to pass when one will be unable to say with national pride, I am French or Belgium, Dutch or German, Spanish or English or even as Kennedy once orated “Ich bin Ein Berliner” because racial and national differences will have ceased to exist. In his book 1984 George Orwell prophesied this disturbing scenario and we are now seeing it coming true like a train smash but in slow motion.

The federalist and architects of this unholy and corrupt alliance or undemocratic union told its peasants that wars by its past Kings, Queens and Princes that had plagued Europe for centuries is the result of stronger countries waging war or invading weaker nations and this union will stop inter nation rivalry and suspicion, thus European wars will be a thing of the past.

They have decided on your behalf that the Final Solution would be to remove all signs and symbols of Nationalism, Patriotism, Racial and Ethnic differences, pride in one’s national flag, and they would accuse anyone of racism if they publicly admit to belonging to an ethnic racial group.

A Dutch EU politician even said that sport with its flags and symbols, encouraged inter nation rivalry and should cease as it raises the ugly spectre of nationalism.

This is the purpose of the European Union. It is the frightening, dark and brooding world that Orwell wrote of


They built a cauldron and into the cauldron mix they threw in a parliament, a justice system, a national anthem, a flag a police force and a department of foreign affairs, they attempted to throw in a constitution too, without success. They then gave themselves parliamentary positions, and strut the world stage like peacocks but the most remarkable thing is that none of its people has given them a plebiscite or a mandate to form this new European entity, or permission to enact legislation and to remove or influence governance and the justice system of the member states.

Many of the government appointed MEP positions are filled by failed politicians, politicians who lost their electoral seats. Peter Mandelson was given one of these MEP positions, he is now EU Commissioner for Trade. Chris Patten, another failed politician was given a position by his chums as the External Relations Commissioner.

These are but two of the unelected people who hold executive positions within the European Parliament and direct thousands of drones that keep the wheels of this pseudo unelected government oiled that one day will rule over the lives of millions of people who have had no say in the formation of this pseudo government that was formed from a diseased spore that was the EEC and that one day will become the dictatorship that will have risen by stealth from the ashes of WW2 to become a political force that is slowly changing the face of Europe.

ENGLAND, the jewel in the crown of Europe, will be no more; it will become just another of the victims swept up in the Final solution for Europe.

"The top priority (is) to turn the EU into a single political state"
Joshka Fischer - The Times 26/11/98

"The experience begs the question of whether it was ever appropriate to submit the EU Constitution to a lottery of uncoordinated national plebiscites...The rejectionists are an odd bunch of racists, xenophobes, nationalists, communists, disappointed centre left and generally p****d off" - Andrew Duff - MEP (laughably Liberal 'Democrat')

"I confess that I am not a big supporter of referendums. I believe that they are especially impropriate when trying to deal with the intricacies of creating a treaty...Although a referendum might be appropriate for Pop Idol it is unsuitable for examining a treaty" - Chris Bryant MEP and Chairman of the Labour Movement for Europe

When the late lamented Scotsman Robin Cook was questioned about devolution and a Parliament for Scotland, the interviewer said, "That's all very well, Mr Cook, but what about England?"

"England isn't a nation," was the reply, "It's only a collection of regions

Above all, the European Economic Community takes away Britain’s freedom to follow the sort of economic policies we need.’ Tony Blair, 1982

'We’ll negotiate a withdrawal from the EEC which has drained our natural resources and destroyed jobs.’ Tony Blair, 1983

AND* THE* BIGGEST * LIE* OF*ALL

“There is no question of eroding any national sovereignty; there is NO blueprint for a federal Europe. There are some in this country who fear that in going into Europe, we shall in some way sacrifice independence and sovereignty. These fears I need hardly say are completely unjustified"

Edward Heath, British Prime Minister 1972.

(Seven Years Later) "The aim was, and is... ever closer political union.

Edward Heath 1979.

The lies of our politicians continue. The total utter arrogance, distain and contempt for the peasantry are breathtaking. Wake up people you are going to lose your country, if you haven’t already. What is happening in the UK is a dreadful social experiment and all the people are guinea pigs.

England’s Final Solution

England’s Final Solution

The firmly entrenched political parties in Great Britain are determined that any form or signs of Nationalism or Patriotism that attempt to arise from the compliant masses in this country, but do already exist in countries like Israel, Japan, China or a host of other countries, must not be allowed to gain a foothold, that is precisely why Nationalism is always equated to Nazi-ism, the far right and white supremacy.

We have been set on a path where at its final destination there is no place for any racial or ethnic differences to exist. If this means re-writing or editing this country’s unique history or the deliberate blurring of the ethnic identity of the people who are native to these island and instilling guilt in those people who tacitly take for granted what is divinely and rightfully theirs, which is their birthright, then so be it. Have you ever wondered why it is there is no place on any government forms to state you are English?

The Final Solution for the whole of Europe is being played out in Brussels, The Hague, Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Strasbourg, Luxembourg and Geneva and its nightmarish effect will one day encompass all the nations of Europe.

The day will come to pass when one will be unable to say with national pride, I am French or Belgium, Dutch or German, Spanish or English or even as Kennedy once orated “Ich bin Ein Berliner” because racial and national differences will have ceased to exist. In his book 1984 George Orwell prophesied this disturbing scenario and we are now seeing it coming true like a train smash but in slow motion.

The federalist and architects of this unholy and corrupt alliance or undemocratic union told its peasants that wars by its past Kings, Queens and Princes that had plagued Europe for centuries is the result of stronger countries waging war or invading weaker nations and this union will stop inter nation rivalry and suspicion, thus European wars will be a thing of the past.

They have decided on your behalf that the Final Solution would be to remove all signs and symbols of Nationalism, Patriotism, Racial and Ethnic differences, pride in one’s national flag, and they would accuse anyone of racism if they publicly admit to belonging to an ethnic racial group.

A Dutch EU politician even said that sport with its flags and symbols, encouraged inter nation rivalry and should cease as it raises the ugly spectre of nationalism.

This is the purpose of the European Union. It is the frightening, dark and brooding world that Orwell wrote of.

They built a cauldron and into the cauldron mix they threw in a parliament, a justice system, a national anthem, a flag a police force and a department of foreign affairs, they attempted to throw in a constitution too, without success. They then gave themselves parliamentary positions, and strut the world stage like peacocks but the most remarkable thing is that none of its people has given them a plebiscite or a mandate to form this new European entity, or permission to enact legislation and to remove or influence governance and the justice system of the member states.

Many of the government appointed MEP positions are filled by failed politicians, politicians who lost their electoral seats. Peter Mandelson was given one of these MEP positions, he is now EU Commissioner for Trade. Chris Patten, another failed politician was given a position by his chums as the External Relations Commissioner.

These are but two of the unelected people who hold executive positions within the European Parliament and direct thousands of drones that keep the wheels of this pseudo unelected government oiled that one day will rule over the lives of millions of people who have had no say in the formation of this pseudo government that was formed from a diseased spore that was the EEC and that one day will become the dictatorship that will have risen by stealth from the ashes of WW2 to become a political force that is slowly changing the face of Europe.

ENGLAND, the jewel in the crown of Europe, will be no more; it will become just another of the victims swept up in the Final solution for Europe.

"The top priority (is) to turn the EU into a single political state"
Joshka Fischer - The Times 26/11/98

"The experience begs the question of whether it was ever appropriate to submit the EU Constitution to a lottery of uncoordinated national plebiscites...The rejectionists are an odd bunch of racists, xenophobes, nationalists, communists, disappointed centre left and generally p****d off" - Andrew Duff - MEP (laughably Liberal 'Democrat')

"I confess that I am not a big supporter of referendums. I believe that they are especially impropriate when trying to deal with the intricacies of creating a treaty...Although a referendum might be appropriate for Pop Idol it is unsuitable for examining a treaty" - Chris Bryant MEP and Chairman of the Labour Movement for Europe

When the late lamented Scotsman Robin Cook was questioned about devolution and a Parliament for Scotland, the interviewer said, "That's all very well, Mr Cook, but what about England?"

"England isn't a nation," was the reply, "It's only a collection of regions

Above all, the European Economic Community takes away Britain’s freedom to follow the sort of economic policies we need.’ Tony Blair, 1982

'We’ll negotiate a withdrawal from the EEC which has drained our natural resources and destroyed jobs.’ Tony Blair, 1983

AND* THE* BIGGEST * LIE* OF*ALL

“There is no question of eroding any national sovereignty; there is NO blueprint for a federal Europe. There are some in this country who fear that in going into Europe, we shall in some way sacrifice independence and sovereignty. These fears I need hardly say are completely unjustified"

Edward Heath, British Prime Minister 1972.

(Seven Years Later) "The aim was, and is... ever closer political union.

Edward Heath 1979.

The lies of our politicians continue. The total utter arrogance, distain and contempt for the peasantry are breathtaking. Wake up people you are going to lose your country, if you haven’t already. What is happening in the UK is a dreadful social experiment and all the people are guinea pigs.

Selected tracts from the NUJ Bible

Selected tracts from the NUJ Bible. Or how to sanitise the news.

This was written for US consumption but it applies right across the western media.

The following was apparently released by the Society of Professional Journalists shortly after the 9/11 attacks: Guidelines for Countering Racial, Ethnic and Religious Profiling.

Just as the UK's National Union of Journalists has banned its members from any "positive" reporting of nationalist news, so too journalists in the US march in politically correct lockstep:

On Oct. 6 at its National Convention in Seattle, the Society of Professional Journalists passed a resolution urging members and fellow journalists to take steps against racial profiling in their coverage of the war on terrorism and to reaffirm their commitment to:

— Use language that is informative and not inflammatory;

— Portray Muslims, Arabs and Middle Eastern and South Asian Americans in the richness of their diverse experiences;

— Seek truth through a variety of voices and perspectives that help audiences understand the complexities of the events in Pennsylvania, New York City and Washington, D.C.

Guidelines

Visual images

— Seek out people from a variety of ethnic and religious backgrounds when photographing Americans mourning those lost in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.

— Seek out people from a variety of ethnic and religious backgrounds when photographing rescue and other public service workers and military personnel.

— Do not represent Arab Americans and Muslims as monolithic groups. Avoid conveying the impression that all Arab Americans and Muslims wear traditional clothing.

— Use photos and features to demystify veils, turbans and other cultural articles and customs.

Stories

— Seek out and include Arabs and Arab Americans, Muslims, South Asians and men and women of Middle Eastern descent in all stories about the war, not just those about Arab and Muslim communities or racial profiling.

— Cover the victims of harassment, murder and other hate crimes as thoroughly as you cover the victims of overt terrorist attacks.

— Make an extra effort to include olive-complexioned and darker men and women, Sikhs, Muslims and devout religious people of all types in arts, business, society columns and all other news and feature coverage, not just stories about the crisis.

— Seek out experts on military strategies, public safety, diplomacy, economics and other pertinent topics who run the spectrum of race, class, gender and geography.

— When writing about terrorism, remember to include white supremacist, radical anti-abortionists and other groups with a history of such activity.
— Do not imply that kneeling on the floor praying, listening to Arabic music or reciting from the Quran are peculiar activities.

— When describing Islam, keep in mind there are large populations of Muslims around the world, including in Africa, Asia, Canada, Europe, India and the United States. Distinguish between various Muslim states; do not lump them together as in constructions such as “the fury of the Muslim world.”

— Avoid using word combinations such as “Islamic terrorist” or “Muslim extremist” that are misleading because they link whole religions to criminal activity. Be specific: Alternate choices, depending on context, include “Al Qaeda terrorists” or, to describe the broad range of groups involved in Islamic politics, “political Islamists.” Do not use religious characterizations as shorthand when geographic, political, socioeconomic or other distinctions might be more accurate.

— Avoid using terms such as “jihad” unless you are certain of their precise meaning and include the context when they are used in quotations. The basic meaning of “jihad” is to exert oneself for the good of Islam and to better oneself.

— Consult the Library of Congress guide for transliteration of Arabic names and Muslim or Arab words to the Roman alphabet. Use spellings preferred by the American Muslim Council, including “Muhammad,” “Quran,” and “Makkah,” not “Mecca.”

— Regularly seek out a variety of perspectives for your opinion pieces. Check your coverage against the five Maynard Institute for Journalism Education fault lines of race and ethnicity, class, geography, gender and generation.

— Ask men and women from within targeted communities to review your coverage and make suggestions.

My words: finally approach the Muslim Council of Great Britain to confirm if any news story might be deemed offensive to Islam.

So how do you think the media portray the ethnic Briton and their youth? For Gods sake do not ask the indigenous people how they feel about  forced multiculturism, or if they are happty with their country being offered to whoever wants it.

...........and remember let hypocricy be your guide.

 /www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=3680

Perception of Nationalism

Perception of Nationalism .
There are 5 sensory organs which trigger perception. Touch taste, hearing, sight and smell and it is the brain that computes the input from the senses. Perception is the process by which an organism attains awareness or understanding of its environment by interpreting this sensory information. When one reads of Islamic militants, Islamic fundamentalists, Islamic Jihad, Islamic ideologies, Islamic terrorist activities and atrocities, for Christians the perception of evil is so strong it is not open to any varying degree of interpretation. Throughout the West the perception of Islam is ugly, dangerous and foreboding and threatens all things that Christians believe in.

None of the five senses warn you directly of the abhorrence of evil, it is your mental understanding given the facts. The problem it is how you process these facts and how valid are these ‘facts’ that will determine your understanding. You may never meet a Taliban fighter but your perception of him has already been cemented.

One could open the debate that religion is nothing more than superstition preached not by Gods chosen ones but by mere mortals who experience human weaknesses and frailties just like you and I. Is religion an industry, if so perhaps it should be listed on the stock exchange, or perhaps it is just a mental illusion, a moral crutch that by following a simple set of God’s commandments angels will one day guide the believers, who confess their sins and pray for forgiveness, and safely deliver them to a Nirvana that God promised all Christians. On Earth that interpretation of Nirvana is different for all cultures, creeds and religions. So who is right, all or no-one?

He who controls the printing presses controls the degree of truth that is allowed to filter through to the masses and thus controls the people’s perception of world events. So how have the press engineered the misconception of a Nationalist? Surely a Nationalist is a Patriot, a person who ‘loves and zealously supports and defends his or her country’. If the brain is bombarded continually with misinformation then the brain receives and computes distorted information. This is being practiced daily by the ‘useful idiots’ the red tutors in Universities, the print media and the National Broadcaster.

It is also referred to as brainwashing. It is important to understand the meaning of patriot has changed since WW2 simply because in time of war it galvanised the patriots to defend their country, today however there is no room for Patriotism/Nationalism in a planned One World Order. These attributes which once were highly desirous are now deemed extremist. In the near future European people will not be able to 'lay claim" to a country so there will be no call for Patriotism or Nationalism.

Patriots/Nationalists, how can those descriptions be tarnished? Well they are. A worldwide agenda is at present underway and it is Marxist/Socialist in nature, its single enemy is Nationalism/Patriotism. With the press and TV Media and in some cases the clergy on their side, the architects of one branch of this global alliance of which there are many including the European Union, is out to destroy the people of Europe who lay claim to “their land”

Meanwhile the press when reporting of Nationalists or Patriots infer extremism, hooliganism, right wing activists, racism ‘but never love and support for ones country’ for without a country which one can lay claim patriotism or Nationalism is just an empty vessel it has lost all moral, religious or cohesive ethnic identity which holds a tribal group together, and that is the precisely the aim of the enemy of the people who wish to destroy all European peoples who “lay claim to their land” and by smearing the name of patriots and selling out their nationhood. We can only gasp at vile depths of depravity this immoral, treacherous humankind will sink to.

Nationalists/Patriots are as welcome in this ‘New European Reformation’ as a Jewish appreciation society in Auschwitz.

Meanwhile the federation uses the resources of its member states National Broadcasting Services to reinforce the supposed advantages of surrendering their constitutions, currency, borders and all that makes them so uniquely and wonderfully different, aided by a bottomless money pit reserved for the Propaganda Unit in Brussels for broadcasting its pro EU friendly messages. The government have ordered the media to show Nationalism negatively, when I say the government I mean the European Union.

The description Union is a misnomer it is NOT a union. No European people voted to merge as a union of European states, our leaders chose to do so without consulting the people, I repeat it is NOT a union but a Totalitarian form of government.

Without access to lie machines or political printing presses it is hard for people who ‘love and zealously support and defend their country’ to spread the truth to the patriots who one day will be dispossessed of “their of land” because without this information the land of their ancestors does not appear to be all that important in the overall scheme of things when daily gossip trivia and TV quizzes were.

So how do we change the public’s perception of Patriots without access to political lie machines? First by removing any perceived connection to right wing extremism, non-existent hooliganism and racism the perception surely has to change, we remove the ‘One Worlders’ of their ammunition. The legitimate concerns by Nationalists that are brought up time and time again are all symptoms not the cause.

Maybe we should highlight neither the symptoms nor the cause as both are blindingly apparent to all indigenous people when walking around most of our cities and towns but rather hold up the mirror that will show them their own future by the worrying facts that cannot be disproved, quoting government figures.

We must appreciate that the lands of the desert people who flee by the hundreds and thousands to our country are being invaded by force of arms and they too are bitterly resentful, the only difference here is that whereas our land is being invaded by stealth any resentment to losing ‘OUR’ land is quashed not by force of arms but by threats of retribution or incarceration for non compliance by the State Political Police.

Perception again, what is one man’s Patriot is another man’s Freedom fighter is another man’s terrorists. The reason Orwell is so often quoted today is that the world is beginning to look much like the world he wrote of. The similarities are frightening. Our Police ‘Bobbies’ once secured our security and the safety of our people now their primary role is to police what might be a construed as possible thought or hate crimes, always taking the side of the perceived aggrieved who will in most cases will be a swarthy interloper, they are now truly Orwell’s Thought Police that are deployed to help create an autocratic empire.

The new Patriot leaders must be well educated, articulate, well dressed and media savvy. A university degree or two would not go astray. The NEW Nationalist leaders must not dwell on race or colour but on numbers. Point out towns and parts of our capital city where THEY, our people are already in the minority and what being in the ‘minority’ in ones country will one day entails by reference to other examples in other parts of the world. They can point out the percentage of white people in our prisons, not the coloured population or immigrants; let the socialist BBC interviewer work the colour ratios themselves.

It is important to stress our degree of loss of self rule which then dominoes throughout unemployment of our people, lack of housing, selling off our infrastructure, the dumbing down of education the unsustainable high population figures, the election system that is open to corruption, the gross imposition of high education costs and the loss of direction for a whole generation of young people.

Most importantly the snake has to be decapitated at its head and although it would be akin to the Ukraine attempting to secede from the Russian soviet empire during the cold war the violent reaction to our attempted removal from the European Union will be as comparatively as ruthless and traumatic. There is no hope for this country while we remain governed by a comparatively small non-elected Marxist Mafioso ruling a pseudo government in a foreign country, END OF STORY.
 
This should be the nationalist first priority rather than worrying about the loss of Southall and Bradford and a host of other English towns that have already lost their unique English character and others that are too far gone and are already sinking into a quagmire reminiscent of third world cess pit caused by third world diversity that the ordinary people will hopefully one day understand. 

There are far more pressure groups within the UK that is vehemently Anti EU. Retake our country and we can make this country look much less unattractive to the third world nomads looking for Shangri La and with self rule we will be able to say to their carers and sponsors, the United Nations, sorry no more, we are full up.

God might save the Queen, but ...

God might save the Queen, but who is going to save her people?
God save our gracious Queen!
Long live our noble Queen!
God Save the Queen!
Send her victorious,
Happy and glorious,
Long to reign over us,
God Save the Queen.

The second verse is occasionally sung as well:

Thy choicest gifts in store
on her are pleased to pour,
long may she reign.
May she defend our laws,
And give us ever cause,
to sing with heart and voice,
God save the Queen.

Now let’s break this down. This stirring anthem is from another time, another Great Britain, some might say even from a parallel dimension. It was a time of Empire, the time of renaissance, a cultural movement dating back to the 14th to the 17th century. It was the era of great writers, dramatists, poets, painters and composers. Our people defended our country from the French, Dutch, Spanish and Germans, and much blood was spilled on foreign soil.

Nationalism, Patriotism and loyalty to the Crown were the opiate of the people and were values encouraged by our past great leaders.

The first definitive published version of the present tune appeared in 1744 in Thesaurus Musicus, as a setting of the familiar first verse, and the song was popularised in Scotland and England the following year, with the landing of Charles Edward Stuart. It was recorded as being sung in London theatres in 1745.

Think about it, the Battle of Trafalgar was on 21st October 1805. Now 264 years later from the first performance of the National Anthem it has little meaning, certainly to a high proportion of our immigrant population, many of them might even find it provocative, even deeply offensive.

If that was not enough I would say you would be hard put to find a politician today that would dare utter the words Nationalism, loyalty or Patriotism in the same breath. It has been deliberately associated with extreme, far right National and Patriotic ideology which our ancestors died for.

There has been a frenzied and deliberate attempt to conjure up references of Nationalism and Patriotism with visions of death camps and Jackboots all for a political advantage. It is rampant political prostitution where anything is allowed whether by fair means or foul.

This disgusting, unimaginable state of affairs took only 60 years to transform this country from proudly patriotic, brave people to a populace with little backbone who are now terrified to show any loyalty or patriotism to their own country for fear of being accused of being racist and frightened by the possibility of a visit by the Political State Police even if they dare put a Union Flag in their front room window.

In the continuum of time it is barely one beat of a butterfly’s wings.

Many of our people died on the battlefield protecting this Island, now our leaders are offering it up as a sacrifice for reasons of personal political gain, wealth and prestige. No words have yet been coined to describe the sorry wretches whom our history, our unique culture, our ethnic identity and our debt to our fallen mean absolutely nothing.

So back to our National Anthem;
May she defend our laws,
And give us ever cause,
to sing with heart and voice,
God save the Queen.

Well for a start she doesn’t defend our laws, to be honest apart from opening flower shows and hospital wards and visiting festering parts of our enriched cities, I don’t really know what she does. People might say she lives on another planet; she has completely lost touch with her people.

I would like to ask her one question; if we sing ” May she defend our Laws” why are our laws made in consensus with 27 European countries and why did she co-sign the acceptance of the EU constitution (Lisbon Treaty) which negates OUR constitution, and violates her Coronation Oath; a valid question from the peasantry.

A month stay in Tower Hamlets or in a decaying Moslem designated area of Oldham or a host of our other cities or towns. Yes even a very slow walk down Wembley High street with heavy security might make her face up to reality as to what her ministers are doing to her country and to her people. I cannot ever give cause to sing with any joy;

To sing with heart and voice,
God save the Queen.

I would sing God save the Queen if she would promise to save us from the traitors within her cabinet and from the rampant colonisation of our country. Until then I do not owe her my respect or allegiance.

Let us finish with this verse.

O Lord our God arise,
Scatter her enemies
And make them fall;
Confound their politics,
Frustrate their knavish tricks,
On Thee our hopes we fix,
God save us all!

This verse should be particularly relevant to our Queen. I would start with a look at the treachery by the Prince of Darkness or the South African communist and then visit the criminals in Brussels; these are the enemies she should be scattering, confounding their politics and frustrating their knavish tricks.

On thee our hopes we fix?

http://tinyurl.com/r3eyn

Queen Elizabeth the Last,

Queen Elizabeth the Last, our Constitution and Treason.

While signing away our ability to rule ourselves the Queen has not violated the constitution because Great Britain, unlike America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc, does not have a written constitution, thus the problem of passing governance of Great Britain to a foreign country does not require her to face constitutional lawyers to decide whether or not there has been any violation.

What we do have is an unwritten constitution. For people that are not aware, on becoming a full member of the EU that anomaly will be righted because sometime in the near future we will be governed by the proposed European constitution.

Incidentally according to a senior EU Commission official, that there are five countries where he and his colleagues are determined to avoid a referendum on the EU Constitution, they are Britain, the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark and Poland. Of course all five could and some most certainly vote against the Constitution, this would obviously create even further obstacles as they attempt to find a way round the democratic votes in France and Holland.

Returning to the constitution, this constitution we have without having actually having a constitution is drawn from a number of sources, i.e. being found in the statutes such as the Magna Carter of 1215 and the Act of Settlement 1701; Laws and Customs of Parliament, Political Conventions, Case Law or constitutional matters decided in a court of law and from constitutional experts who have written on the subject.

I emphasize there is no written British constitution but there is an unwritten one based on the rule of law and the supremacy of parliament.

But let’s discuss the Queen’s treason. Treason is an entirely different kettle of fish. Treason is an offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender, in this case the Queen, owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family. Violating our unwritten constitution does not constitute Treason, but violating her oath of office does.

She has by signing one EU treaty after another knowingly or unknowingly aided or abetted the overthrow of the government of the state to which she signed an oath of allegiance at the signing of her Coronation Oath, the oath of office being. "Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand"?

By signing treaties that pass that governance to a foreign power to me constitutes a crime of Treason. So the question one must ask is why she has not been tried for treason? I am glad you asked, it’s a valid question indeed.

The most blatant act of treason was to give her Royal Assent to the Lisbon Treaty which is the original draft constitution for the European Union.

This was so important a document that is was put to a referendum to people of France, Holland and Eire. It was a democratic choice whether to relinquish their own constitution for a European one. It was rejected overwhelmingly.

Even members of the European Commission admitted it was the same document with cosmetic changes. She has signed an illegal document to abolish our unwritten constitution in favour of a European constitution. How is that NOT treason?

Treason does not fail because many colluded together to commit the crime, The Queen, members of The House of Lords and the members of the Commons all took an oath of allegiance to Britain, the fact that we have effectually ended up with a revolutionary system that ignores the previous unwritten constitution of Britain does not mean that according to that Constitution there was no crime of treason to answer.

So in conclusion what are the chances of getting Queen Elizabeth The Last and her co-conspirators to face court on a charge of treason? Buckley’s! But for anyone who wants to achieve fame and notoriety overnight might I suggest a method of achieving this. You personally take the Queen to court on a citizens arrest to answer a charge of treason, a charge which you personally will represent yourself using legal aid.

Failing that might I suggest a class action. For a charge of treason to be heard in a court of law might make the peasants realise all is not well in this rotten Western EU province.

Now this will achieve two things, firstly notoriety is assured and secondly the public will be made aware that the Queen by her actions IS answerable to explain why she should not be charged with treason, and to explain why her actions and the actions of her politicians of taking the United Kingdom apart and handing it piecemeal to a foreign power against the wishes of an estimated 68% of her people is not a treasonous act.