Reaching For New Heights

"Reaching for new heights"

In the overall scheme of things like sending probes to Pluto and beyond I do not see it as a “Great Leap Forward” for Western Civilisation in this 21st century to announce an edict, a general principle of understanding not unlike the Magna Carta or the Bill of Rights that with the full backing of the law driven by popular demand by referendum a tacit agreement that it is now societally acceptable that  a gentleman can now legally introduce his private parts into another gentleman’s bottom even likening it to a consummation of Marriage between a Male and a Female. 

The practicalities of same sex Consummation? Well I won’t even dare go there.

Maybe I am being a little too judgemental. I would like to add I also have major difficulty grasping the fundamental understanding, fleeting or otherwise with the connection between homosexuality and being gay, surely one is a full-on human sexual perversion like a fetish for high heels or sexual games but wearing rubber, a cruel human weakness the other an inner warmth and a feeling of well-being.

We could take this one step further and debate Gay Pride. 

We are reluctant to discuss Homosexual pride which is Gay pride but by another name. The waving of the rainbow LGBT flag appears to generate intense Pride, but there appears to be no pride at all in being a Male or Female homosexual, why is that?

In the fable the little boy saw the king was wearing no clothes but everyone was too terrified to comment. I say what I observe whether politically correct or not, like we used to years ago when I was growing up. The subject of men and women of the same sex who shag each other indiscriminately AND it being universally acceptable is bizarre when it should be seen for what it is.

By all means if that what sexually satisfies a person like pleasuring oneself then go for it, it is your body you choose what you would like to do with it but Homosexuality should not be made societally acceptable by law, even animals as a species and of the same sex don’t generally fornicate with each other, neither should cannibalism or grave robbing be acceptable even if people did demand a referendum to legally indulge in same.

It has now become highly political because ALL things HAVE to be inclusive regardless how inexplicable or weird they might appear because it is a vote winner and satisfies the chattering classes whether it be Gender Dysphoria or Gender Identity Disorder which sparks the debate on whether you can choose which toilet you would prefer to use and puts cross-dressing in the easy reach of everyone. It is Liberalism for liberalisms sake and is lurching out of control.

We THINK we live in a highly civilised society but in the main we are one step away from being mental savages. That is precisely how Trans-dimensional travellers would see us, as primitive natives hell bent on slaughtering each other and many having the morals of Tom Cats but as long as it is ”inclusive” …hey hey that’s OK! 

We as a species are going no-where. Technology and the advancement of Moral awareness are moving away from each other exponentially. The conspiracy theorist or sceptic might ask are the changes being caused by an additive to our food or water, are we being sprayed with chemicals.

The BBC are past masters of experimenting with the weird. They appear to have a warehouse full of these strange people who are brought in to complete the picture of inclusiveness at all costs, be they dwarfs or people born with unfortunate physical deformities, people that should not be paraded on television purely because the BBC is not bound by the shackles of non-inclusivity so is free to celebrate the ‘richness’ and ‘vibrancy’ of the unusual for the sake of inclusiveness, it is quite jarring and obvious a bit like the bearded lady in a circus.

I hope a BBC news producer is not reading this or no doubt there WILL be a Bearded Lady reading the News at Ten or a bearded lady Coroner, bearded lady detective, Bearded Lady Chief Police constables, Lawyers, forensic pathologists, bearded Lady police commissioners and Judges in their TV programmes. 

Criticism, any criticism draws a lot of name calling but name calling is not new, the accused was once punishable by death whether they were Heretics or blasphemers.

Today bigots, racists, Islamophobics, Homophobes and Narnseys are in copious abundance and attract a lot of media attention. It is not a question if same sex marriages should be legal, that is obvious but where are we heading as a supposed intelligent Human species.

"The honourable member for Leicester told our reporter although he and his wife Nathan have consummated their wedding...er on a number of occasions, they  are unable to have children but were hopeful in the fullness of time of purchasing a small child from Guinea-Bissau once their application for an import licence had been approved.”

Let the Games Begin

Let the Games begin 

Powerful people realize how important it is to keep this Authoritarian Collective moving forward, the West IS being reshaped. The EU in/out referendum will be a replay of the second Irish referendum (Lisbon Treaty) and as a commentator said short of Karzai-style stuffing of the ballot boxes the European and Irish political establishments could scarcely have done more to push this second Irish referendum in the way they want.

"To ensure a "YES" vote, all the normal rules governing balanced media coverage were suspended. The European Commission poured €1.5 million into an unprecedented advertising blitz. The voters of Ireland had the chance to say "NO" to the political class which now rules over them thanks to what has amounted to the most extraordinary slow-motion coup d'état in history"

The  survival of the EU is far more critical, anything and everything will be permitted to ensure there is no breakup of the European collective. As with the Irish referendum frightening the people with non-truths will be the order of the day. The EU Chief Jean-Claude Juncker is doing just that. He is terrified of the clear and present danger of the wall coming down and National borders going back up again and self-rule being returned to the people of the occupied territories and he and many of his work-mates having to work for a living.

TRUST ME ON THIS ONE, IT WILL BE A VERY DIRTY GAME The money from the EU coffers for contingency plans such as this and the corporations like Ryanair that ensured a YES vote at the second Irish referendum will pale into insignificance compared with the amount available reserved for the EU in/out referendum.

LET THE GAMES BEGIN. To affect a referendum result two things are needed Funds and ‘Frighteners’. It worked fine in Eire it can work again in Europe. Huge funding is obvious but let me explain the ‘frighteners’. The EU Chief Jean-Claude Juncker came up with a corker.

He warned Britain could spark World War three if it votes to leave the Union. Yes it gets as desperate and infantile as that and we will not understand it until we understand how important it is that this monstrosity stays together like a Blowfly with its larvae.

His comment of impending doom might sound bizarre but lies are lies, but what is most bizarre is their degree of the nonsensical. Woe betide any regions that threaten to leave the European Super State particularly the wealthy ones.

Even the former Prime Minister of Luxembourg has been dragged into “Team Project” fear by saying that: "Whoever does not believe in Europe, whoever doubts Europe, whoever despairs of Europe, should visit the war cemeteries in Europe.

Frankly I cannot see any connection of leaving the European Collective and European War Cemeteries but the Former Prime Minister of Luxembourg could, well his job is also on the line.

One can almost feel the panic setting in. Norway is not part of the EU but is part of the Schengen Agreement and it is crucial that borders remain under the control of Brussels. Norway co-operates with the EU on foreign and security policy issues, .which is a misnomer if there ever was one. Not having control of ones borders one loses the ability to secure those borders as the people of Sweden are finding to their nightmarish horror.

the Schengen Agreement was critical for a single Europe it allowed the free movement of persons and was the core part of the original Treaty of Rome from the early days of the European Economic Community, nationals of EEC member states could travel freely from one member state to another on production of their passports or national identity cards which explains why The UK has the highest number of immigrants from Poland and which ranks second behind India for non- Britons living in the UK.

If 250,000 displaced Syrians and 100,000 Africans who have made it to Europe and have gained residency “have the right to demand entry as nationals of EEC member states to travel freely from one member state to another on production of their passports or national identity cards” Norway who are not a EU member can also be their final destination as they also ceded their borders to Brussels via the Schengen Agreement.

I RATE THE EVENTUAL BREAK- UP OF THE EU AS OF EQUAL IMPORTANCE AS THE FALL OF THE BERLIN WALL AND EAST GERMANY JOINING THE REST OF EUROPE.

Skulduggery in Westminster

How MI6 pushed Britain to join Europe

Paul Lashmar and James Oliver, Sunday Telegraph, 27 April 1997,

A brief foreword to those who say they were never offered a referendum to join a European Union although many people did vote YES to join the European Economic Community (EEC) voting for closer trade ties with Europe. So who signed Great Britain into this European Union? This article was written in 1997. The skulduggery is breathtaking and is still taking place today

A secretly-funded Foreign Office unit used public money to mount a covert propaganda operation aimed at ensuring Britain joined the European Community. Paul Lashmar and James Oliver investigate.

IN LATE 1972, Alistair McAlpine, later Lord McAlpine, was recruited as treasurer for a pro-European lobby organisation called the European League for Economic Co-operation. It was only much later that he discovered the reason for his appointment. A "branch of the security services, called, I believe, something like the IDA", had been financing breakfasts and lunches for this and other bodies, he later wrote..........

Now, the full extent of the involvement by the MI6-linked Information Research Department of the Foreign Office in supporting Britain's joining the European Economic Community can be revealed.

For nearly two years, IRD had been funding invitation-only meetings between senior media figures and pro-European politicians, diplomats and businessmen. These were regular, expensive, and well-attended breakfasts at the Connaught Hotel.

McAlpine said last week, Sir William Armstrong, at that time head of the Civil Service, found out about the events. He went to the Prime Minister, Edward Heath, and the IRD funding ceased. As a result ELEC had taken over running the breakfast meetings and McAlpine, then as now a fund-raiser extraordinaire, was brought in.

British and American intelligence services had traditionally supported Britain's entry into the European Economic Community a bulwark against the Communist Eastern bloc. The CIA funded the European Movement, the most prominent extra-governmental group, seeking to influence public opinion for a European Community. Between 1949 and 1953, it was subsidised by the CIA to the tune of £330,000.

In June 1970 Edward Heath's Conservative government had been elected with a pro-European manifesto. But public and parliamentary support for Europe was slipping and Britain's entry was in doubt. Although the Cabinet was dominated by pro-Europeans, Heath presided over a party that was deeply ambivalent about the "Common Market".

Later that year, a meeting of senior information officers in Whitehall was convened to discuss what could be done. An official present at that meeting says the only department that seemed capable of achieving something effective was the Foreign Office's Information Research Department. IRD had been set up in 1948 by Christopher Mayhew, then Foreign Minister, to place covert anti-Communist propaganda throughout the world and was funded by the intelligence budget - the secret vote. IRD was closely linked with MI6 and shared many officers - including at one time the double agent Guy Burgess. 

By the late Sixties, IRD had more than 400 people occupying River-walk House opposite the Tate Gallery and undercover officers in embassies all over the globe.

The civil servant who ran the covert pro-Europe campaign was Norman Reddaway, Under-Secretary of State at the Foreign Office, with a brief covering IRD and other FO information services.

Mr Reddaway, who later became ambassador to Poland, and is now retired, set up a special IRD unit to propagandise in favour of British entry and counter those who opposed it. In an unpublished interview, Mr Reddaway says: "The researchers were extremely good at researching the facts about going into Europe"

The unit worked closely with a number of pro-European politicians to rebut anti-EEC arguments. IRD wrote and brokered articles which were placed in the press "There was no shortage of MPs who were pleased to see something published under their name in The Times and elsewhere," a former insider said.

The separate, breakfast offensive, meanwhile, was organised by the ex-director of publicity for the Conservative Party, Geoffrey Tucker. Mr Tucker had left the position following the Conservatives' victory in 1970 to return to independent public relations, but, as a convinced European, had suggested to Mr Heath that a series of informal meetings should be organised to find ways of ensuring support for entry.

These meetings were to be between "insiders" from the Government and Civil Service (including the negotiators) and "outsiders" (such as media figures and opposition leaders). Tucker set about arranging what would become known as the media breakfasts held in a private room at the Connaught Hotel.

Pro-Europeans from all parties were represented. Those from the Labour Party included Roy Jenkins, Roy Hattersley and Gwyn Morgan, the deputy general secretary of the party, now working for the European Commission. Also present was Michael Ivens, director of the Aims of Industry organisation. The breakfasts were usually attended by Norman Reddaway and Ernest Wistrich, director of the British European Movement.

The meetings usually involved 20-30 people. By bringing in figures such as Nigel Ryan from News at Ten, Ian Trethowen, then managing director of BBC Radio and Marshall Stewart from the BBC Radio Today programme, the media breakfasts were able to suggest pro-European ideas for television and radio programmes. 

Tucker allowed the media guests access to the EEC negotiators. "Into the breakfasts came the people from Brussels. so the people who went to the breakfasts from the media got a briefing on what was actually going on day by day. So we were making news," says Tucker. He says News at Ten started a series of five-minute specials on the EEC, with a strong factual tone, as a direct result of the breakfasts.

Nigel Ryan told us: "I certainly met Tucker many times in the period as he was Heath's media man. I cannot specifically remember these media breakfasts in this distance of time, but the ITN special items may have come out of them. These items would have been made with the usual editorial independence that ITN so fiercely guarded."

Marshall Stewart recalls attending a number of the meetings which he says he found useful to gather information "at a time when there was a paucity of facts about the EEC"

Mr Tucker has even claimed that, after pressure from the campaigners, the broadcaster Jack de Manio was removed from his job as a presenter of BBC Radio's Today programme because he was "too anti-European", But Marshall Stewart denies the claim, describing it as "bizarre"

Very few of the participants appear to have been aware of the source of the funding for the breakfasts, although some had their suspicions. Michael Ivens says he suspected that it might have been funded by IRD. "Tucker once told me that Ted [Heath] objected to the cost of the breakfasts." he said. Tucker says he thought they had been funded by the European Movement. Ernest Wistrich says he is unsure where the money came from.

Following withdrawal of IRD support," the flame was kept alive" according to Tucker, by Geoffrey [later Lord] Rippon and the European League for Economic Co-operation.

After Armstrong prevailed on Edward Heath to cut IRD's secret subsidies, ELEC appointed McAlpine to find funds to keep the pro-Europe media campaign going. "One matter I really do know about is how to organise a good breakfast," McAlpine says. The breakfasts - now in the Dorchester - continued until after the 1975 referendum.

The Pale Blue Dot

The Pale Blue Dot.

As Carl Sagan wrote, "We succeeded in taking a picture of earth from deep space and if you look at it you see a dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever lived out their lives. The aggregate of all our joys and sufferings, thousands of confident religions, ideologies and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilizations, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every hopeful child, every mother and father, every inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every superstar, every supreme leader, every saint and sinner in the history of our species, lived there on a mote of dust, suspended in a star spectacled cyclorama.

The earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and in triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of the dot on scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner of the dot.

How frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds, our posturing, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the universe, are challenged by this point of pale light.

Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity -- in all this vastness -- there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. It is up to us. It's been said that astronomy is a humbling, and I might add, a character-building experience. To my mind, there is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world.”

Excerpt from a commencement address delivered May 11, 1996. Dr. Sagan's book Pale Blue Dot .

No help will come, let us not be coy, there is no need to rest on protocol, let’s name names. After the Japanese whaling fleets have successfully wiped out all the Minke whales from the worlds oceans, purely for scientific purposes you must understand, when the Malaysian loggers have managed to strip the worlds forests bare from Sumatra through to the Amazon Basin.

Maybe when the Indonesians stop mindlessly setting their country alight in yearly preparation for another years planting of crops causing the resulting smoke to cloud the skies of their cities and towns to spread as far as their neighbouring countries and causing millions of tons of carbon dioxide to rise and heat up this pale blue dot.

The drugs lords from Columbia and Burma stop killing the blue dots inhabitants or managing to send a large percentage of its population in a hypnotic daze from hawking happy dust to its people, and the masses of starving humanity over-populating this pale blue dot without any due regard to the this small planets sustainability.

Rich countries who refuse to sign the Kyoto agreement because of the possibility of affecting their countries economic growth. Indonesian fishermen who have depleted their own fish stocks and now resort to trawl illegally in other counties waters just to remove fins from sharks.

The mindless decimation of much of our fauna or to drain the bile from living bears because it is supposed to be an aphrodisiac and will heighten the sexual cravings of superstitious aging Oriental males, the list is endless. Sagan was right “There is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.

I am informed from the day I am born I can watch the Chinese people march past me and I will never see the end of the line in my lifetime because of their current numbers. I now read that this is claim to fame is about to be over-taken in the not too distant future by India because of their breeding rates which are beyond comprehension.

If the Indians can do that to their own large country what hope has England got for any sort of future. But who cares. The government doesn’t appear to; they refuse to admit a looming problem exists. They cannot or will not see the big picture it interferes with their plans for a vast globalised consumer market, but eventually well past their lifetimes their descendants are going to pay a very high price indeed for their uncaring selfish greed.

So what is the future for this pale blue dot hanging inconspicuously against a velvet ebon backdrop, what will happen to its peoples, its animals, its birds, its giants of the sea and the hopes and fears of the children left on a dying planet caused by their ancestor’s greed and self interests?

Unknowingly we could be the only planet amongst the entire multiple universes that a greater being planned as the great experiment. As regards other extra terrestrial intelligence? Maybe they don’t exist, who knows? Maybe we really are one of a unique kind, and we blew it!

Who will come and help us? We appear not to be able to help ourselves. But judgement day could be much sooner than we think, because our ills are rising exponentially and very rapidly, we won’t get a second chance.

We must also ask ourselves, do we really care about our planet our people our children and the continuance of this great experiment? We all chorus, yes of course we do, but we are seeing very little pressure put on governments in an effort to stop the heating up of this pale blue dot before it turns grey and dies.

We call on your sense of Nationalism

We call on your sense of Nationalism

The cry was Patriotism, Loyalty to the Nation State or Nationalism; call it Jingoistic if you like but it was precisely the same words that was the catch-cry to entice young men and women to volunteer to help defend their country in WW1 and WW2 and if necessary to die for their country, no other pleas to sacrifice one’s life would have worked quite as well. 

It called on one’s inherent sense of belonging to an ethnic group, to a like-culture which defined who you were. That was 70 years ago the world has changed and now Patriotism, Loyalty to the Nation state or Nationalism is considered the true enemy.

Why is that, why have these words taken on a totally different meaning, who changed the meaning, why are they equated with Narnsyism, Fascism and the Far Right; they never used to. So what has changed? It is a subject that is never brought up by the Press or Controlled TV Media. The words loyalty and Patriotism have been changed to give a perception of Fascism, a dark, negative, threatening, anti -establishment connotation. This was not so in 1939, quite the reverse.

The military man on the poster pointing directly at you declaring the ‘Country Wants You’ did not say excepting Nationalists, Patriots and those loyal to the Nation State need not apply, he was particularly looking for you.

As the Nurnberg trials were taking place it was decided by the victors Europe’s future direction had to change, Nationalism or a sense of National identity was to be eradicated never again to emerge in Europe, it was seen as the cause of instability and wars that ravaged across Europe throughout its history.

Nationalism? It is what it says on the tin, it is being able to identify with a National, ethnic and cultural group, which in the UK used to be British, the sub groups being English, Scottish, Welsh and Irish. Blurring the meaning and introducing many other sub groups would help blur ethnic identity. In nature it is achieved by introducing differing species. 

On a human scale it is achieved by changing the demographics for economic or political gain. In nature its purpose is not necessarily to eradicate the existing species but to seamless merge those with an introduced species ignoring the disproportionate breeding rates. The similarity in changing the characteristic and ethnic make-up of nations are obvious.

Inviting 2 to 3 million Middle Eastern and African people into the UK is achieving this. The question one might ask is who benefits by changing the cultural, ethnic and religious demographics of a land mass? simply one who wishes to destroy a nation’s sense of self identity for a particular purpose.

The quintessentially English look of many of our towns is fast disappearing.

Whole swathes of London are taking on a Middle Eastern appearance; with Burka clad women invariably pushing baby strollers and Dhoti clad men speaking in foreign tongues throng the high streets. Many shops with Middle Eastern signage are common. The transformation is taking place daily in front of our eyes.

Dewsbury, Ealing, Harrow, Hounslow, Slough, Newham, Redbridge and Tower hamlets have all been ceded to the Third World with the ethnic British group being in the minority. I could start listing towns.

Apart from an event or events of cataclysmic proportions I doubt whether the changes that have been spreading across Europe and indeed the Western World since WW2 like an Ebola plague are reversible.

Multiculturism is a tool to achieve Global rule and Global Corporatism commonly known as Fascism that is the aim. Multiculturism is one tool that will achieve this, but try and snuff out a nation’s self-identity is fraught with danger and it will be just that which will again ignite Nationalism in one way or another thorough Europe.

Oh Dear, Canada

Oh Dear, Canada.

Justin Trudeau was moved to tears apparently when he recently officially recognized Canada’s historical abuses toward aboriginals, and he is now calling on the Pope to apologize. He was prompted no doubt by the Australian Prime Minister’s apology to the Australian Aborigine for their historical abuses. Australia went one better though, a whole Nation came together and said a combined sorry for the sins of their fathers and a yearly national ‘SORRY DAY’ was implemented. Better late than never one might say.

As far as I am aware there have been no similar apologies and pledges of respect from Rome for their excursions into Olde Albion and their abuses to its first people or apologies from Spain for their bloodthirsty forays into South America.

The tears were triggered by the emotive speech Trudeau made where he admitted “no relationship is more important to me than the one with the First Nation. I will give you my word we will renew and respect that relationship” this was interspersed with sobbing. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has just officially recognized Canada’s historical abuses toward aboriginals, a very humanitarian and Christian of the man wouldn’t you say?

In passing what was that important relationship he identified himself with First Nation, was it before he became a Politician of after?

Putting the First Nation people aside for a moment let me take this pantomime a little further if I may. The Canadian National anthem leads with words ‘our home and native land’, whose native land might that be? Trudeau recently declared, not in the same speech obviously or it would have shown up his true plans for his people that “Canada should NOT be defined any longer by its national identity, ethnicity and language and that immigration is going to be the NORM”

To further confirm this he said “we define a Canadian not by a skin colour or language a religion or a background but by a shared set of values aspirations hopes and dreams that not just Canadians but people around the world share” in other words Canada’s doors are open to the rest of the world and is a small cog in the foundation of a single Global Society.

So who does its ‘home and native land belong’? He has a range of speeches to suit every occasion some without the tears reserved for moving speeches for a captive First Nation audience. These were the words spoken by a ‘proud Canadian’ patriot, their leader waxing lyrical of his people’s bright future, that will NOT be defined any longer by its national identity, ethnicity and language and where immigration is going to be the NORM” so it is open house and “home” to the rest of the world

If a people have NO national identity, ethnicity or language then who are they? While drying the tears from his eyes will he strip the people of the FIRST PEOPLE of who he respects unreservedly of THEIR National Identity or is this only reserved for the Johnny-come-lately’s? Like most politicians does he speak with forked tongue? Are the tears for the press or are the promises to harvest First Nation votes come election time, to who was this representative of the people performing?

He intends to remove the glue that holds his nation his people and culture together as a distinct society. If one cannot identify with an ethnic group or society with a common language and culture then his people are on the road to a dark totalitarian future.

Immigration on a grand scale is the tool to achieve this. I doubt if this directive originated from the Canadian Prime Minister but came from a small Cabal that controls the world’s finances, meets in secret held under the Chatham House rules and shapes the world and its future. He is not singing a solo, which makes one realize these leaders are singing from another song-sheet

So to sum up the question that goes begging is if ‘Canada will NOT be defined any longer by its national identity, ethnicity and language and that immigration is going to be the NORM’ what is its future?

Trudeau may have been invited to a seat at a table that the likes of which you and I will never be invited, reserved for people that are busy shaping a New World. What is taking place in Canada is being replicated throughout the West.

Canada’s future is a mirror of what a One World will look like but the target is only the West, which includes Australia, New Zealand, USA, Europe, and of course the UK. Trudeau confirmed it again when he said “This is something that we are able to do in this country because we define a Canadian not by a skin colour or a language or a religion or a background, but by a shared set of values, aspirations, hopes and dreams that not just Canadians but people around the world share” a globalist future no less, at the same time pledging to take in 25,000 refugees by the end of February, that number would be upped to 50,000 by the end of 2016. He said “Everyone in Canada is waiting to meet you.” and claimed all 10 provinces in Canada are in favour of accepting the flood of refugees.

We must not be too hard on the representative of the Canadian people, the British Prime Minister told HIS people, “it is not Islam that needs to fit in with the British way of life but mainstream Britain that needs to integrate more with the Asian way of life” again was the Muslim vote the draw-card nearing election time. The treachery continues. A Jewish parliamentarian sitting in Westminster once said the English as a race do not exist.

It was the French Prime Minister Sarkozy, who told HIS people that they must change, that there will be dire consequences if they don't, and that not to intermarry with Mulattos is bad for the survival of the country, I would say quite the reverse is true. Thus he amalgamated the concepts of preference for minorities in job hiring with that of the need for the French to intermarry racially.

He declined to follow his lofty principles and decided to ignore the fate of his country and let the devil take the hindmost when he married a tall leggy white female bombshell of the Paris catwalks. I am with him on this one, the choice was not difficult. I ask the question did he also attend any meetings held in secret with planners that control the world’s finances and its future.

The treachery of these representatives of the people is unbelievably staggering and the people meekly follow. Peasants need strong leaders not traitors without any principles.

So to sum up the question that goes begging is if ‘Canada will NOT be defined any longer by its national identity, ethnicity and language and that immigration is going to be the NORM’ who are its people and what is their future?

The really good news coming out of the nations capital Ottawa is that Feb 25 has been designated Hijab Day.

I see a pattern developing here throughout the First World. I was also about to write I see a direct correlation between Canada’s future and that of Sweden but I just stopped myself in time.

To foster and promote uniformity and blind obedience

To foster and promote conformity and blind obedience.

PsysOps it is all around us. It is all encompassing most people are totally unaware it even exists. You are being watched and listened to and generally monitored continually. Remain passive don’t raise your voice or rock the boat, keep your head down remain anonymous you are one of the shepherd’s sheep. An ‘extremist’ could be a patriot, a Nationalist, or a loyalist but is an enemy if he/she is opposed to the government’s view.

There are a very few people in charge controlling millions of people that is why PsyOps exists at all. If your views on Multiculturism (passive Colonization) are opposed to that of the establishment it might be wise to preface a comment with ”I am not a Racist but” without that preface a following comment could be seen as extreme and place you on a data base you are unaware of.

STARTS According to released documents published by The Intercept, a special unit with the British spy agency is involved in psychological operations, or PsyOps, and propaganda campaigns against groups it labels “extremist.”

The documents are the latest from the trove released by whistleblower Edward Snowden. The new documents show that the British Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) operates an elite unit known as the Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group (JTRIG). First revealed last year, JTRIG is known for using sexual “honey traps” to discredit targets, using denial-of-service attacks to shut down Internet chat rooms and control Pro boards.

Despite official claims that JTRIG is focused on international targets in Iran or Afghanistan, the latest information reveals that the unit was focusing on domestic activity within the U.K.—activity typically monitored by local police or domestic law enforcement agencies.

The Intercept reports:

“An August 2009 JTRIG memo entitled ‘Operational Highlights’ boasts of ‘GCHQ’s first serious crime effects operation’ against a website that was identifying police informants and members of a witness protection program. Another operation investigated an Internet forum allegedly ‘used to facilitate and execute online fraud.’ The document also describes GCHQ advice provided ‘to assist the UK negotiating team on climate change.’

“Particularly revealing is a fascinating 42-page document from 2011 detailing JTRIG’s activities. It provides the most comprehensive and sweeping insight to date into the scope of this unit’s extreme methods. Entitled ‘Behavioural Science Support for JTRIG’s Effects and Online HUMINT [Human Intelligence] Operations,’ it describes the types of targets on which the unit focuses, the psychological and behavioural research it commissions and exploits, and its future organizational aspirations. It is authored by a psychologist, Mandeep K. Dhami.”

The documents (Behavioural Science Support for JTRIG’S Effects and Online HUMINT Operations, U.K. Ministry Stakeholder Relationships Spreadsheets) outline tactics employed by the agency, including ways to manipulate public opinion, understand human thinking and behaviour, and encourage conformity.

According to the documents, JTRIG “currently collaborates with other agencies,” including the Metropolitan police, the Security Service (MI5), the Serious Organised Crime Agency.

One of JTRIG’s objectives includes “monitoring ‘domestic extremist groups such as the English Defence League by conducting online HUMINT’; ‘denying, deterring or dissuading’ criminals and ‘hacktivists’; and ‘deterring, disrupting or degrading online consumerism of stolen data or child porn.”

One of the reports from 2011 outlines JTRIG’s tactics, including uploading YouTube videos containing “persuasive communications,” starting Facebook groups and Twitter accounts, and creating fake online personalities and supporters “to discredit, promote dg more troops and funding for the war.”

Indeed, the operations seem crucial to the mission of the United States government (and totalitarian governments around the globe, for that matter).istrust, dissuade, deter, delay or disrupt.” (The BNP/EDL/UKIP/British First, Nick Griffin and anyone opposed to the Government or the status Quo are Narnseys and/or Extremists)

(NB. Israel recently announced a special tuition assistance program for university students who agree to regularly post messages on the internet to combat anti-Semitism and anti-Israel propaganda. A shill attempts to change public opinion by casting doubt in the mind of their readers.)

JTRIG also relies on an understanding of psychology which is “critical” to operations. The unit used social media campaigns to encourage and foster “obedience” and “conformity”. Section 3.6 Obedience, says compliance can be achieved by “engendering liking (attractiveness); instilling a sense of scarcity or secrecy; getting compliance to a small request at first.”

Essentially, the U.K. government is using an elite unit of spies to launch psychological operations on “extremists” by creating fake accounts and videos to promote conformity and obedience. However, the practice is not exclusive to the U.K. PsyOps are used by nations around the world.

The 2002 edition of the Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms defines psychological operations as “integrated employment of the core capabilities of electronic warfare, computer network operations, psychological operations, military deception, and operations security, in concert with specified supporting and related capabilities, to influence, disrupt, corrupt or usurp adversarial human and automated decision making while protecting our own.”

Since that time, PsyOp has fallen out of favour and the term is now officially known as Military Information Support Operations, or MISO. It is defined as “Planned operations to convey selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behaviour of foreign governments, organizations, groups, and individuals in a manner favourable to the originator’s objectives.”

As PsyOp has fallen out of favour and the term is now officially known as Military Information Support Operations, or MISO it follows then as Per Ardua Ad Astra, though adversity to the stars, the motto of Britain’s Royal Air Force so should the MISO’s emblem embrace the dictum “To foster and promote conformity and blind obedience”.

The United States military was famously caught using psychological operations in 2011, when Rolling Stone reported that “the U.S. Army illegally ordered a team of soldiers specializing in ‘psychological operations’ to manipulate visiting American senators into p
“PSYOP [Psychological Operations] are essential to the success of PRC [Population & Resources Control]. For maximum effectiveness, a strong psychological operations effort is directed toward the families of the insurgents and their popular support base. 

The PSYOP aspect of the PRC program tries to make the imposition of control more palatable to the people by relating the necessity of controls to their safety and well-being. PSYOP efforts also try to create a favourable national or local government image and counter the effects of the insurgent propaganda effort.”providin

According to the leaked U.S. Special Forces counterinsurgency manual:

Without a doubt, the U.S. government continues to label its own population “extremist” and is focusing its propaganda efforts domestically. The U.S. Special Forces Counterinsurgency Manual—as well as the new Snowden documents—should is required reading for all revolutionaries seeking to understand the tactics of the U.S. government and indeed all the first World Governments. Only by educating ourselves can we hope to form a united, empowered front against government tyranny.

This article (Britain Using PsyOps Domestically to Encourage “Conformity”) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and theAntiMedia.org. Tune in! Anti-Media Radio airs Monday through Friday @ 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. Help us fix our typos: edits@theantimedia.org