The Church Bans the BNP

The Church of England bans the BNP

A Repost...I am forced to comment further on the blatant two-faced hypocrisy of the Church of England. Now I do not know what the true grounds they had for putting a ban on the BNP although my guess would be they used the tired old accusation of it being as a racist/white supremacist organization. Their quoted reason ‘Activities declared "incompatible" with Church teaching on race equality.’

True we do have race inequality in this country, the inequality is the discrimination against our race; the indigenous race is not equal to the other races that are colonizing our country. This reverse Racism we are experiencing has been accelerating since WW2. It became more apparent since immigration from the third world commenced and has increased on a mammoth scale.

For a moment let us remind ourselves of the saying ‘one swallow does not make a summer’. How many BNP supporters with racist tendencies does it take to make the BNP a racist organization? Does Islam see Christians as equal if not why not ban Islam and the building of Mosques in our country? Let me take this further if I may.

The Church, Roman Catholic Church and the Church of England clergy have for decades sexually abused children and many cases the senior clergy have either closed ranks or covered up this vile practise. Even Nuns were renowned for repeated physical abuse of children. I would like to refer to the ‘Lost Children’.

Children were sent to the four corners of the Empire, many were told their parents were dead when in fact they were alive, put onto farms in places like Australia and Canada and worked like slaves, and in many cases sexually violated. It was decades long institutionalized Paedophilia within the Clergy, and was covered up by senior bishops,  still with me?

So the question that is begging to be asked is how many Paedophile priests does it take to make the Catholic Church a hotbed of Paedophilia ‘Incompatible with general morality?’ 

The same applies the Church of England clergy. One could ask was it institutionalised within the Church as the accusation of Racism being institutional within the Police? 

If child sex abuse is not compatible with church teachings why it did flourish, and when it was discovered why was it covered up and the offending perverts transferred to other Diocese. The Catholic Church particularly has had to pay enormous sums in compensation for this abuse of children and is still paying it to this day.

Now I could say I find the Clergy’s behaviour quite incompatible with human morality and ‘incompatible with Church Teachings’ so should Churches be banned? Who judges the morals of the church, the robed closet perverts? Frankly all I see is blatant hypocrisy when the church pre-judges the BNP morality when they need to get their act cleaned up first before judging the ‘incompatibility’ of a legally constituted political party.

Maybe the C of E should be looking inward and rooting out their perverted transgressors. Incidentally I always thought there was separation between the Church and the State, guess not.

There is a cancer at present that is running s right through our society, it involves the Elite, the Police Hierarchy plus the departments from where their orders emanate. The MSN, print and TV, the CPS, the Clergy, the educators, foreign-born Negro immigrants in token positions in local government and Westminster for political expediency and thousands of special ethnic interests groups, Government incompetence and local council corruption involving of conflicts of interest

Our enemy is a Cancer that is eating away at a once homogenous stable, civilised, cohesive society where a person identified strongly with his fellow man and freedom of speech was not something the government decided on the degree of freedom allowed, our birth-right is something that is acquired or inherited at birth, It is not given out freely to the third world poor on arriving at Heathrow Airport and automatically makes them British whatever the Government might tell them. 

I repeat Birthright refers to something that is acquired or inherited at birth.

Our Birth-right goes hand in hand with Nation-hood. What is nationhood? It is a community of persons not necessarily constituting a state but bound by common descent, language and history. Nationhood shouldn't be dictated or manipulated by a few, but in today’s Great Britain it is being systematically being destroyed for a purpose our people have yet to understand

It is almost like an elite club which not everyone can join, particularly loyal patriots who are not welcome in this New World in the making. Should I worry? No morally bankrupt despotic system lasts forever however democratic it appears on the surface.

To the clergy might I suggest a little more attention to your bible might not go astray, "he who is without sin among you let him cast the first stone"

Midsomer Revisited.

Midsomer Revisited

There is no debate, argument or discussion; the change in the demographics of the countries of the West is meticulously well planned and deliberate. The degree is apparent when Programs on ITV and BBC are now written to reflect the unwanted diversity of peoples that reflect the lowest depths that ‘modern’ England has is now sunk. We are invited to immerse ourselves totally in an unashamed bacchanalian orgy of unabashed indulgence in Multiculturism, ethnic harmony and racial understanding. But who the hell asked for this change, a Mr Keith Vaz seems to think this make us a Modern Britain? I will get to that revolting alien creature later.

I have commented before and it is essential to understand the sole purpose of deliberately inviting an overwhelming multitude of foreign cultures and people of non-European ethnicity to populate Europe and the UK was for over time create a perception there is no discernible native ethnic grouping, it is more than just a perception it is the cornerstone to achieve a single totalitarian Europe bereft of Nationhood and identity.

If Coudenhove Kalergi plan comes to fruition then the man of the future Europe will be hybrid or a person of mixed race. Diversity and Political Correctness are methods used to describe the tools of destruction used to destroy the homogeneity of people, it could be tribes it could be nations.

Kalergi said “In time the races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals.”

Alternately if that is not the case then there could only be one or more of three reasons for the deliberate, unsustainable numbers of migrants encouraged to migrate to Europe. One; Europe’s economies were in such poor shape after WW2 more people were in demand to kick-start the economies. Two; the more people looking for work meant they would have accept coolie wages which suited big business and race was never an issue and lastly the population was getting older result less people working to pay pensions for the aged, at the time Islam was never factored in, but nevertheless over time Nation States will cease to exist, they were seen as a dinosaur of yesteryear.

No, I suggest the Third World is not being targeted for demographic change it is ONLY the WEST. This political interference into TV program content has nothing to do with showcasing and embracing our ‘Rich’ diversity it is being done to subliminally instil the perception in people’s minds this country has ceased to be the homeland of White indigenous people.

I apologise if anyone takes offence for my mentioning of skin colour. England is the ancestral home of the Angles and Saxons and people of Northern Europe and they do not want to be overwhelmed by Africans or people of the coconut islands of the Caribbean and beyond. Showcasing our rich diversity in the New Midsomer Murders could easily mirror modern day Slough, Dewsbury, Newham or a host of other English towns.

Midsomer is NOT a TV show about a ‘quintessential African’ village or a village on the Pakistani/Afghanistan border it was about ENGLISH people, ENGLISH Villages and the ENGLISH way of life, this was before the cultural Marxist realised that the programme had no Multi-hued or Non English actors in the cast, it could not be allowed to continue in this vein.

A strange anomaly was found that ethnic minorities apparently avoid this show. A study in 2006 found that Midsomer Murders was "strikingly unpopular" with minorities. Removing the ‘Quintessentially Englishness’ of the show for political expediency I think ITV will now find that indigenous people will also avoid watching this masterpiece of demographic engineering like the plague,

Food for thought, in Midsomer there has been on today’s count 51 deaths, 222 of which were murders, but this figure changes by the day as the American debt changes by the second. To date not one murder was committed by a Black person that is a plus surely. Will ITV ever show a murder commited by a black in the new Midsomer Murders with the new format I doubt it, you see that is considered racial profiling and thus racist but nevertheless totally irrelevant to the numbers of these people in our jails. It really highlights the comic absurdity of this show and others just for the sake of political correctness.

At the time Labour a MP Keith Vaz, chairman of his party’s “Ethnic Minority Taskforce” whatever that, is a penniless refugee from Aden whose parents were poor Indians from Goa said: ‘I am appalled at Mr True-May’s comments after he said he said he did not use black and Asian people in the series because ‘it wouldn’t be an English village with them’. This Vaz person standing on his hind legs pontificating that the decision to exclude ethnic minorities from Midsomer Murders not only misrepresents modern Britain, but also dismisses ‘the valuable role ethnic minority’s play in enriching our country.’ Omitting to say that parts of Modern Britain resemble Third World  cess-pits.

It highlights the dumb, pig-ignorance of this parasitic foreigner not to understand the show had nothing whatsoever to do with race or showcasing “the valuable role ethnic minority’s play in enriching OUR country.” whose country? This creature’s country is India. Midsomer Murders was about a quintessentially English village as Bollywood films are quintessentially about India and as the Follies Bergère is quintessentially French. If the commentator is black the discussion always defaults to race, what’s the matter with these people? I smell a fundamental lack of self-esteem.

I would say his position of chairman of the Labours party’s Ethnic Minority Taskforce was won purely on the fact that his black skin colour was wholly and solely the essential obligatory requirement for his position, a position not afforded to a white person; Bloody hypocrite.

It was pointed out that in Midsomer there have been a few blacks in the show over the years but only in very minor roles. I suggest if the ITV wanted an African theme then that maybe they should have dispensed with Barnaby and Jones altogether replacing them with a couple of Zulus, Hutus or even Hottentots and construct a back-lot with African village huts and rewrite the script, that should at least please Vaz. The problem is Midsomer would then really begin to resemble Slough or a dozen or more other ‘English’ towns.

Back to TV programming, I do not believe it is simple case of the ITV taking upon itself to make these changes; the order comes from much higher it is more than coincidence that this idiocy is rampant right across the sick mainstream media. I can understand John Nettles leaving the show after it was forced to use a variegated or multi-hued-cast.

By the same token I can understand how the Catholic Bishops would feel if the Vatican demanded that the new Pope’s job be given to a African women with a huge lower lip implant and a bone through her nose purely for the sake of inclusivity to visually embrace the church’s rich multi-racial diversity.

This idiocy has to stop somewhere and the boardrooms of the BBC and ITV might be a good place to start. I expect to read of a Negro actor who got his acting break on Downton Abbey, Upstairs Downstairs, Midsomer Murders or Grantchester but the day I read of a white actor getting his acting break on a ‘quintessentially Black’ show is when it is discovered that Santa Claus is a real person after all.

I sometimes wonder if a group of faceless people are intending over time planning to wipe all traces of Caucasian people from the history books.

I want to use the words of a conversation by two very famous men. They describe accurately the true meaning of Political Correctness.

A DEFINITION OF THE TERM "POLITICAL CORRECTNESS, EXPERTLY DEFINED.

For the last six odd years, almost all of the things I wanted to write or say, have been stymied by a recently coined term referred to as "POLITICAL CORRECTNESS"! Although I consider myself rather fluent in the English language, that term was not in my vocabulary. My curiosity got the best of me and I decided to do a little research and after two weeks of chasing fruitless leads, I found what I'd been looking for at the Truman Library and Museum in Independence Missouri. An unnamed source there sent me copies of four telegrams that were between Harry Truman and Douglas MacArthur on the day before the actual signing of the Surrender Agreement.

The contents of those four telegrams below are exactly as received, not a word has been added or deleted!

(1) Tokyo, Japan
0800-September 1,1945
From: General D A MacArthur
To: President Harry S. Truman

Tomorrow we meet with those yellow bellied bastards and sign the Surrender Documents, any last minute instructions!

2) Washington, D C
1300-September 1, 1945
To: D A MacArthur
From: H S Truman

Congratulations, job well done, but you must tone down your obvious dislike of the Japanese when discussing the terms of the surrender with the press, because some of your remarks are fundamentally not politically correct!

(3) Tokyo, Japan
1630-September 1, 1945
To: H S Truman
From: D A MacArthur and C H Nimitz

Wilco Sir, but both Chester and I are somewhat confused, exactly what does the term politically correct mean?

(4) Washington, D C
2120-September 1, 1945
To: D A MacArthur/C H Nimitz
From: H S Truman

Political Correctness is a doctrine, recently fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and promoted by a sick mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a piece of SHIT by the clean end! 

……….. I wish that explanation was attributed to me. PS. “Vibrant Diversity” is another, meaningless, empty description put about by the sick mainstream media.

What is Sovereignty?

What is Sovereignty?

Sovereignty, the authority of a State or

Nation to govern itself.

Sovereignty is understood in jurisprudence as the full right and power of a governing body to govern itself without any interference from outside sources or bodies. In political theory, sovereignty is a substantive term designating supreme authority. So why does the UK take orders from Brussels?

Sovereignty, Constitution, self-rule, who gave ours away to a European consortium?

Russia's president Vladimir Putin says his country would consider making loans to Greece if the two countries move forward on joint energy projects. 

This news would not have been received warmly by the silk suited bureaucrats in Das Kapital as Greece is within THEIR sphere of influence and it is Brussels who decides who gets loans from European Banks and the IMF within the occupied satellite countries of Europe, not Russia. The Greek Prime Minister said "Greece is a sovereign country that over the past years has been facing a difficult economic situation," a rich, masterpiece of understatement.

I could not help but notice the dreaded EU flag behind Putin and the Greek prime Minister during the photo shoot. Was Mr Putin paying tacit homage to the fact that Greece was one of the EU’s renegade territories, a satellite country that had the temerity to venture outside of the EU’s jurisdiction begging for loans?

The question is, like the United Kingdom IS Greece a sovereign nation? I am not sure about the sovereignty bit; I know we certainly used to have a constitution. Both the UK and Greece accepted and signed the EU Draft constitution cleverly disguised under the name of the Lisbon Treaty which takes precedence over their own constitutions. If a county had its own constitution it would have its own laws and it would have control over its borders surely. No, we have lost an Empire, lost self-rule and signed up to some-else’s constitution. Something smells here. Sovereignty, Constitutions, Royal Family?

Our own German Royal family, the Battenberg’s, whose 240 bedroomed house is exempt from the bedroom tax has more to do with Lilliputian characters putting on a show for the peasantry, for the adoring people waving their little flags. I admit it does encourage tourism and offers the adoring herd bread and circuses. They get a chance to see people just like them but wearing uniforms of Admiral of the Fleet and Colonels, dripping with gold braid and medals. It may have been acceptable in Richard the First time but we have moved on.

Voyager has left our Solar System and has headed into the unknown; we are sending probes to mars and still a man calling himself Black Adder (rod) whose jolly fun job is to wear a silly suit and hammer on a door in Parliament demanding entry to the House. His day job, or rather official duties also include responsibility as the usher and doorkeeper and to make sure blown light bulbs and broken chairs are replaced and maintenance is up to scratch. I put the hammering on doors in Parliament equal in entertainment value to “I am a celebrity get me outta here” I sometimes wonder if I am a character in some-one else’s dream, or nightmare perhaps.

Who else was a Lilliputian? Well it was Field Marshal Douglas Haig, 1st Earl Haig, KT, GCB, OM, GCVO, KCIE, ADC who having the dubious honour of being one of the most stupid of Generals Great Britain had ever given birth and was responsible for the magnitude of the battle of the Somme which still stuns the imagination.

The Somme was an epic of both slaughter and futility; a profligate waste of men and materiel such as the world had never seen. On the morning of July 1, 1916, 110,000 British infantrymen went "over the top." In a few hours, 60,000 of them were casualties. Nearly 20,000 of these were either dead already or would die of their wounds, many of them lingering for days between the trenches, in no man's land. The attacking forces did not gain a single one of their objectives.

It does not end there I’m afraid, on the day after the debacle, Haig, this fool of a man stated that the enemy "has undoubtedly been shaken and has few reserves in hand," he discussed with subordinates methods for continuing the offensive. It was going to be a war of attrition until every last British soldier was killed or wounded. You might wonder how as a General of his ilk lived to the age of 69, keeping his head down and avoiding the machine-Gun bullets helped.

Haig's army had suffered more than 400,000 casualties. For the British, in the grave judgment of noted military historian John Keegan, "the battle was the greatest tragedy…of their national military history" and "marked the end of an age of vital optimism in British life that has never been recovered."

If it is of any consolation at the end of the next war of any substance there will not be a body count of the dead but a body count of the living. My question was not answered. Are we a Sovereign Nation if we do not have supreme authority of a state or Nation to govern itself? The simple reason is we do not have full authority to govern ourselves because we are hampered by treaties we have signed with foreign countries.

So have we been left with part Sovereignty If so where or when did the treason occur and who was responsible? Last question is why these are Lilliputian people still in power and standing before you as candidates in the next General Election as our next Prime Minister, haven’t they done enough damage to the country already?

European Union; what is the End Game?

European Union, what exactly is the End Game?

Its formation had nothing to do with the unifying of European nations; on the contrary it was all to do with the destruction of the homogeneity of the European People.

The sole purpose of deliberately inviting an overwhelming multitude of foreign cultures and people of non-European ethnicity to populate Europe and the UK was to over time create a perception there is no discernible native ethnic grouping. This is already apparent in many areas of European and UK cities and towns. The facts in this essay are true and non-debatable.

Its target is The West. It is also apparent even in places like Canada, Australia and New Zealand. However being a comparatively small country its effects on the UK are particularly nightmarish and fragmenting. England now consists of large groups of Minority Ethnic Clusters, BME’S, foreign community groups and ghettos. It is being meticulously planned and deliberate. It is without doubt Globalist in design working to an agenda; there is no subtlety here it is thinly veiled.

Stop the music; turn off the spotlights, remove the Tits and Feathers, peel back the gold Tulle and turn off the coloured footlights and you will expose this nation wrecking monster of an excuse for a ‘Union’ for what it is, a staging post in a One World Order.

Don’t look at the carefully placed side dishes, like promoting closer economic and social ties; look at loss of Sovereignty and loss of Governance and  blurring of borders. I emphasise most strongly its purpose No, its only purpose is to destroy once and for all European National Identity and unity. Do people understand what National Identity means? Its trigger was the horrors of WW1 combined with WW2. With Europe in chaos after WW2 there was no better time to finally stop all forms of Nationalism dead in its tracks? It would be the last opportunity.

Nationalism has nothing to do with superiority of race but being able to identify with an ethnic group as do the Japanese, Papuans, Chinese and many other peoples, but they are not the ones being targeted.

The mistakes of post WW1 which allowed Nationalism and National Socialism to flourish and for Hitler to come to power were never going to be repeated. Auschwitz and Treblinka was the trigger. In time this evil monster will threaten the borders of Russia, its last frontier. Its influence extends from the West coast of Ireland north to the Arctic Circle east to the borders of Russia and south? …..Well could the Empire eventually encompass turkey and beyond?

The gauze of respectability hides its evil purpose. Their enemy is the people; their histories, cultures, national currencies, national borders, and national flags. These must be removed. Like race it is these elements that give a people a sense of identity and being, and with the help of unsustainable immigration this change is being accelerated. Very conservatively Eight million people, or 14 per cent of the UK population, are now from ethnic minorities and call England home.

A French politician even suggested removing the word Race from their constitution, Nicolas Sarkozy said that French citizens should inter-marry with non-Whites for the good of France but he chose not to, and a Dutch politician even suggested banning flags at football matches. It was the British Prime Minister Mr Cameron that said “It is mainstream Britain that needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life and not the other way round”

These are comments made by treacherous UK and European leaders.

The above identifiable national traits are the real tangibles of Nationalism, the enemy of Marxism/ Communism/ Socialism. I will avoid discussing treaties, Human rights, Race laws, Thought Crimes and laws to Combat Fear and Alarm, they are purely adjuncts to cement this unholy union together, frighten the people and viciously crush any resentment to this undemocratic take-over.

So where does Anti-fa fit in here. People’s political naivety is understandable; there are much more important issues in life like personal survival. ANTIFA.EU. Inc is nothing more than a club for like-minded mindless Yobboes, any correlation to politics is purely coincidental. They are the Communist ground shock troops with only violence in mind.

The European banks lend heavily to the poorer occupied territories, loans they cannot repay without severe austerity measures, and who dictates the fiscal policies of these countries? Why it is the IMF and the European banks. Taking control of country fiscal policies is the Holy Grail to enable these cabals to take over governance of an occupied territory. A number of poorer European countries are already beholden to these banks.

The saying is ‘I come bearing gifts’ but I am not going to refer to the Hadron collider, Telescopes, European Space programme all funded by the richer satellite countries all give pseudo credibility to the ‘Union’ which is not a true self- governing political bloc at all but is striving to become one, a conqueror who comes by stealth, and are jig sawing into place the first piece of a Unified one World Government. There have been science fiction books and Movies depicting this frightening future world.

Part Two

I have tried to remove most of the window dressing that disguises its true purpose and by doing so concentrate on its intentions. I realise this article is very simplistic but I am trying to reduce it to its bare bones. It is impossible to guess where this road is taking us.

A while ago a referendum was held in the north of the UK to gauge the people response for cutting the county into regions. It was rejected but the government went ahead anyway and regions now exist in the UK it is called democracy.

Regions also exist within the occupied European Union Satellite countries purely for ease of governance, but it will be a while before the description of Euro Regions are fully accepted in place of Countries. The United Nations name will change with changing events, they will have the task of world government as INSCOG did in Orwell’s book 1984.

The bottom layers of the triangle to unify the world are the United Nations, the UNHCR, Club of Rome, Royal Institute of International Affairs, European Court of Justice, Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg group and the Council for Foreign Relations. Fact, it is Zionist driven.

 A very small influential group of people forging this are from America and the financial heart of London they have a huge input into this New World organization; it is where the machine that is driving this monster actually resides. They are the King Makers, Jewish bankers, and industrialists that desire a New Order. National identity means nothing in this brave New World.

NATO, IMF, World Bank Group, European Banks, EU, G20. United Nations are all part of the structure of an eventual fully Globalised system, It cannot fully move forward until National Awareness and National Identity is fully dismantled. At this moment Russia has declined to be a player in this One World nightmare and the architects are not happy about this which explains the Anti-Russian rhetoric by all the worlds press owned by a handful of people. To incorporate the huge landmass of Russia into Europia surely would have put the icing on the cake.

In the pursuit of a One World Agenda the very idea of Colonies and Empires were repugnant. It was seen as Nationalism in its most virulent form. The Roosevelt government requested Great Britain to divest itself of its Empire in return for loans for their shattered economy. The loan was negotiated by a John Maynard Keynes. The loan was for $3.75 Billion, todays figure (US$57 billion in 2015) Great Britain duly complied.

The greatest crime and danger in this New World is ‘racism’ this impedes a smooth transition to a one identity-less, nation-less Prole-like people. It is referred to as a ‘sickening crime’ when a person rants to a cuckoo or indigenous person comments “Why don’t you go back to where you came from” but there is hastily closed ranks by the Senior Police, Children’s services and councils to cover up rape of epidemic proportions of English Children in the UK, which appears not to be a sickening crime to the extent they wilfully covered it up.

A Mr Griffin, the Leader of the British National Party alerted the authorities of the rampant epidemic of child rape by immigrant Pakistani in Rotherham a town in the North of England, he was promptly arrested on charges of racism. The headlines read “British National Party leader Nick Griffin has been charged with four race hate offences.” He will appear at Leeds Magistrates' accused of using words or behaviour intended or likely to stir up racial hatred.” What were the Race Hate words he used you ask? “They were Pakistani child rapists.”

The Wordsmiths in Brussels closely monitor public utterances that might hinder the smooth passage to Orwell’s World, utterances that hint that races exist.

When a government starts to populate the country with non-ethnic people racism becomes a serious problem and it is paramount to make this the number one issue to combat, as Mr Griffin found out to his dismay. Do you wonder why disciples of Allah sit in the British Parliament but Christian Believers do not sit in the Pakistan parliament?

RACISM; there’s that word again. The British judiciary decided the sexual abuse of pre-pubescent English children by Pakistani predators was not an issue. A woman who saw only strange foreign people surrounding her on a Croydon tram cried out in anguish and frustration. The Police went into manic overdrive to find this woman accused of this ‘sickening’ crime, which they did and put her and her baby in jail. It was NOT a sickening crime that she and her race are being displaced. 

I hope this article explains in a small way why racism is such a threat to the emerging New Order but child rape of our children is a non-issue.

At election time Snake Oil salesmen promise a cornucopia of good times a plenty but true freedom and freedom of expression is never mentioned, a promise they can never deliver. The good times they speak of are reserved for them. 

The King Makers really do see humans as a sub-species whose purpose is to just breed, consume and obey and vote for the status quo to enable these King Makers to continue to sate themselves with good times. There will come a time when voting will not be a choice.

The controlled Media always equate Racism with Nationalism; it is Nationalism that is the bond to one’s ethnic identity. I ask why at this time in the list of British Demography and Ethnic Backgrounds are there White Irish but no White English. Perhaps the English are completely unaware they have already lost their National identity.

There is a surprisingly few people that decide what we do, how we think and what we say. Get off your knees people.

“If at the next election you again vote for the lesser of three evils, and there is only three evils to choose from, you are still voting for an evil nothing changes”. Albion

What the hell are Shi’a, Sunni, Wahabbis, Abul A’ala Maudoodi, Salafi, Bareilvi Masjids and 'Maudoodi' Masjids doing in a Christian country?

www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Ethnic-minorities-make-one-population-

Escape to the Country or White Flight.

Escape to the Country.

White Flight (Fright)

Or Cuckoo in the Nest Syndrome.

The BBCTV programme is called Escape to the Country. In truth it is a chronicle of ‘white flight’ a TV concept that documents and celebrates a modern day phenomena, the displacement, scattering and fragmentation of the indigenous English and Welsh people. Like birds whose nests have been colonized by Cuckoos they flee deep into the English and Welsh countryside hoping to purchase nests close to like-species.

It is a welcome release for those who can afford to look for safety with their own kind in these lovely little villages. One I saw with thatched roofed cottages, a village pond, and a local Church built as early as the 12 century with Gargoyles and  stained glass windows.

Diversity to the long term inhabitants of the village in its true sense would mean very little. If one was to ask mine host in the White Swan what was meant by diversity he would no doubt say it would be the diversity of pubs in the village.

I idly daydream; come election time Mr Damp the village schoolmaster who is standing for the Greens party has promised to lobby for long awaited funding for a public toilet in the village, to press for funding for a new village notice board and to pressurise the local police to seriously investigate and apprehend the miscreant who has been tying party helium balloons around the necks of the Swans on the village pond, a story the local paper the Cockshutt-cum-Petton Clarion has managed to milk on its front page for over two months now, the Yard have been notified.

If one were to ask Mr Damp what he thought of wholesale immigration into this country, his eyes would glaze over and he would shake his head and reply nonplussed “what Immigration?”

These people really are living on another planet, not Planet England. That is precisely why the situation in the UK will deteriorate until the point of irreversibility; the thinking it is fine as long as it is not in my backyard. 

These are the same people bereft of this vibrancy of rich diversity who vote for the status quo at election time suffering with the ‘cus that’s who my dad voted for’ syndrome not realising the England their dad voted at election time does not exist anymore, it disappeared with Gladstone and the Empire because of people like them. It does not hurt until it hurts you. These people are not hurting enough yet.

But of course forced diversity it is not everyone’s cup of tea is it, so escape is the only answer. It is only young chaps in I.T or Bank Manager retirees that can afford properties starting at a half million pounds and up being shown around heritage listed thatched roofed properties built with local stone, with 4 reception rooms, farmhouse kitchen, 4.1/2 bathrooms, 6 bedrooms, a conservatory, a swimming pool nestling on 5 acres complete with horse paddock with breathtaking views overlooking the English countryside, oh and within walking distance of a pub.

It is only the poor white Caucasian that has the opportunity to experience and taste the heady fruits of Diversity. They can experience this within a handshake of their front door and gasp at a kaleidoscope of strangers from the Hindu Kush, poor Pakistani from the tribal belt bordering Afghanistan. Bearded nightshirt wearing strangers walking 6 steps ahead of pram pushing burka clad females gracing the streets of many English towns and cities. 

The beauty of Multiculturism is that it places you within a train ride of Bradford, Birmingham, Oldham, Rotherham, Dewsbury, and a host of other English towns; or to take advantage of a cheap daily return to Tower Hamlets. You don’t need the Cotswolds.

Who could possibly dream up the concept of a lady Blackamoor from the Caribbean showing diversity escapees bolt holes in the country? Perhaps it was a gem by an elderly script writer for the Monty Python show found locked for years in a basement at the BBC. 

As an aside my wife said that while channel hopping, briefly pausing on The Biggest Loser she landed on a TV programme feast called Embarrassing Bodies where the viewers were treated to a close up of a gentleman’s private parts. I shivered is nothing sacred?

If we were to take these TV concepts to the next level how about the BBC doing a reality programme of the redevelopment of the Auschwitz concentration camp. 

Depending on one’s point of view, I am sure a miniscule number of people (Police-speak) would accuse me of commenting in bad taste but there is very little left that has not been televised that has not been in bad taste so why stop now? 

If the said camp is not restored it will soon be forgotten and just deteriorate into a run-down ugly building. The only people visiting Auschwitz these days are Jewish tourists, 120 year old ex-inmates and children’s tour groups.

Any BBC programme person looking for Kudos at a programme planning meeting might suggest a reality programme showing the redevelopment of Auschwitz into 2 bedroom luxury apartments, complete with community swimming pool and easy access by a branch rail to the city. A morning TV breakfast show could even have a competition for a name for the new development. Personally I would remove the jingoistic slogan of Arbeit Macht Frei over the entrance and maybe plump for Dun Roamin’ Villas, it is more welcoming.

Bad government, bad politics, bad taste; take yer pick but be careful who is listening and watching. It could mean 6 months in an Austrian political jail.

Stephen Fry; The God Factor

Stephen Fry: The God Factor.

I was reminded of when we were  regularly visited by Mormon Missionaries. I did question why it appeared that it was our family and our family alone that was being specifically and ruthlessly targeted, I thought only primitive tribes were their victims not someone living in a rural, God fearing  area,  Maybe the sale of the Watchtower magazine improved the lives of these primitive tribes to whom I refer. They have now stopped coming…..the primitive tribes, not the Mormons.

They usually appear with a young person in tow maybe a work experience person, impeccably dressed, clean, God fearing, likeable people. I always had doubts about a supreme being though as did Mr Fry, and with a huge industry backing them with many franchises catering for different Gods and religions there must be something going for it so I chose to have two bob each way. 

Not a good idea said the Mormons it will not assure one of automatic entry into heaven, nevertheless if I were Mr Fry I would spread my money evenly on an each way bet hoping to avoid “Frying” in hell for crimes against………. ‘er well the natural order of things.

HEAVENS! Now this was a subject I always wanted to discuss and they unwittingly chose it. I asked in my innocence where the Kingdom of Heaven might be located. For heaven’s sake these people are professionals there must be a ‘reference’ for its location if not in the Old Testament then maybe in the New Testament as it is mentioned many times in the bible. I lightly tapped with my pencil on the assistant’s bible and pointed out that Revelations might be a good place to start.

The work experience assistant opened his bible looking for a ‘reference’. At last I was going to find out. I could not contain my excitement any longer and like an excited school-girl who was about to tell her parents she had been asked out on a date for the very first time I gushed “is it beyond Pluto or near Epsilon Bootis, maybe near Orion’ belt, perhaps the Horsehead Nebulae? The man said “look we need to get back to you on that one”. I had caught the man’s attention not realising they were intent on not coming back.

As they picked up their bibles to leave I inquired of them can they also do a couple of more ‘location’ checks at the same time for Hades, Hell and the Gates of Wrath? I must admit I was somewhat nonplussed why these religious visitors could not give me an immediate answer to any of these places as they are all well documented in the bible.

An Emma Barnet a religious columnist for the Telegraph headed her article on a video of Stephen Fry denouncing ‘God, should he exist, as “utterly evil, capricious and monstrous’

She said “Thirty years ago to the day, my mother received her confirmation that God exists: ME”

Emma dear, I do not want to appear capricious, but it was not necessarily God who was responsible for your mother's delicate  condition I suggest it was your father, her husband.  But she was right when she wrote, “talking and writing about belief in God is considered such a difficult subject that one relative warned me off it entirely: “Emma, just leave God alone and write about something else this week – like the Magna Carta anniversary.” or the Crusades, oops sorry that is me being capricious.

They say one should not discuss sex, politics or religion. So why am I on a loyal, Patriotic website discussing religion well I thought it would make a change from Politics? Sex is a definite no-no; everything relating to sex is becoming blurred. A man’s wife could be another man, a girls husband can be another lady recognised by the church and in a court of law, both satisfying sexually I imagine but not producing offspring, our primary purpose on this earth. 

In my youth sex was never a problem one either liked it or one did not.

In another interview Mr Fry referred to his partner as his ‘Husband’. Very wise move, these things need to be sorted well before the wedding night as it determines who gets to do what to whom and how during the consummation that cements the celebrating of their ‘wedding’.

What was being discussed on forums was the age difference between the Bride and the Bridegroom. Did it matter? There is little danger of an unwanted pregnancy.

Same sex marriages, same sex weddings, same sex engagements, it is still tricky today. Perhaps Emma’s mother did not live long enough to see the future or she would have advised her daughter differently. She would have advised “Emma, just leave Sex AND religion alone and write about something else this week like politics or Magna Carta anniversary” That is probably why I feel comfortable writing about politics.

Stephen Fry may feel that “the moment you banish him [God], life becomes simpler, purer, cleaner, more worth living” – Emma disagrees, but for millions of silent others the polar opposite is true. The question being asked is does he exist at all? Many of the true believers who died on the poppy fields of Flanders or in the withering machine gun fire at Dunkirk will know, and I pray to God any God, there was a heaven waiting to accept them and mend their young broken bodies.

Totalitarianism, Your Future?

Totalitarianism, Your Future.

Only the mob and the elite can be attracted by the momentum of totalitarianism itself. The masses have to be won by propaganda. Hannah Arendt.

A Nationalist society is completely paradoxical to that of a Totalitarian society. Unless there is a global rejection of all forms of Nationalism there cannot be a Global World Order.

Directions from a highly centralised authority like the European Presidium in Brussels and the loss of National sovereignty, by the forfeit of one’s constitution and the surrender of borders would not be tolerated in a truly Nationalist society. Nationalism in China, Japan and India is a National characteristic that is the good news. The bad news for Europe is what is taking place in Europe is the birth of a New Order, and it is Totalitarian in nature unlike the old USSR which was Authoritarian.

A Totalitarian regime attempts to control virtually all aspects of the social life including economy, education, art, science, private life and morals of citizens. "The officially proclaimed ideology penetrates into the deepest reaches of societal structure and the totalitarian government seeks to completely control the thoughts and actions of its citizens." 

To the point we see laws being enacted to police the thoughts and determine by judicial proclamation the boundaries of rights of thought and expression of its citizens. The Governments sole purpose of a Democratic Government is to govern, not to pry into the private lives of its citizens. The little boy asks of his little school-mate “why you are brown”. That is a criminal offence in Britain today even for a child.

Authoritarian is an extreme version of Totalitarianism, it primarily differs from totalitarianism in that social and economic institutions exist that is not under governmental control. In Europe and the UK that difference is becoming increasingly blurred, what is becoming Totalitarian in nature in Europe will in time become Authoritarian as we are seeing now with the Banking cartels taking charge of the fiscal policies of the EU’s satellite countries.

After WW2 there was NO rejection of Nationalism by the people of Europe it was a decision that was made for them by the victors, this is being achieved by the deliberate ideology of forced Multiculturism which in turn destroys all National and ethnic Identity.

This is a worrying omen; Eric Hoffer, in his book The True Believer, argues that mass movements like communism, fascism, and Nazism had a common trait in picturing Western democracies and their values as decadent, with people "too soft, too pleasure-loving and too selfish" to sacrifice for a higher cause, which for them implies an inner moral and biological decay. He further claims that those movements offered the prospect of a glorious future to frustrated people, enabling them to find a refuge from the lack of personal accomplishments in their individual existence. The individual is then assimilated into a compact collective body and "fact-proof screens from reality" are established. Is this this the mirror of our society?

Today we are not looking at communism, fascism, and Nazism for the answer for a “glorious future for frustrated people enabling them to find a refuge from the lack of personal accomplishments in their individual existence” we are being offered a Totalitarian New Order for Europe. It could be debated our values are decadent, with people "too soft, too pleasure-loving and too selfish" to sacrifice for a higher cause, which for them implies an inner moral and biological decay but the answer will not be found in a New Order for Europe, only servitude.

Domination by a government of all political, social, and economic activities a nation, totalitarianism is a phenomenon of the twentieth century. Earlier forms of despotism and autocracy lacked the technical capacity to control every aspect of life. The term is applied both to fascist governments and to many forms of communism.

One alternative is democracy; it is Government BY a very small group of extremely wealthy and influential people, FOR the people, BY this same small group of very wealthy and influential people. This is the way it is and is the way it has always been. Understand this and you will understand your special place in the scheme of things.