Monday, 14 July 2014

The New Europe.

The New Europe.

While Europe slept a comparatively few extremely influential people decided on my and your behalf to completely change the face of a civilised structured society that has taken hundreds of years to create its unique characteristic differences by overwhelming their homogeneity of race and culture by force of numbers. 

They decided that loyalty to European Nation States and any form of Nationalism was like the Dinosaur it was a legacy of the past; it had outlived its usefulness. We were on the cusp of entering the New World, a BRAVE NEW World or so THEY decided.

Some people did wake from their deep slumber and voice concern that was to be expected, but their numbers were few in comparison and not worrying enough to cause the planners any real concern, nevertheless laws and legislation were very quickly enacted and hurriedly put in place to stifle any resentment from these doubters, they were euphemistically called Race Laws but had nothing to do with Race but all to do with shutting down resentment to the dilution of one’s ethnic difference and loss of the freedom of free speech.

How are they destroying the homogeneity of Europeans?

It was not difficult. One way to destroy an existing species or fragment a tight-knit homogenous group of people is to introduce a foreign species or group of people in huge numbers whose accepted standards of behaviour are completely alien to the existing group and whose culture is threatening to their own.

To put it another way, the most common motivation for introducing a new group of individuals foreign to the existing group is that of economic or political gain. Its purpose is not necessarily to eradicate the existing human species but to merge them seamlessly with the introduced species deliberately ignoring the vastly disproportionate breeding rates. The consequences that might result with animals and birds could also apply to humans; in the past this experiment with animals or insects was employed to destroy a parasitic species that was a threat to the host.

Here we are not just introducing new groups for economic or political gain but to completely change what Europe is a distinct family of nations. To experiment with human society is extremely dangerous as it has never been tried before in such huge numbers so we cannot predict its future, but going by the past history of this planet using animals and birds as an example many will be inundated and will move elsewhere, as humans we will retreat into strictly ethnically aligned Ghettos.

A proportion will by miscegenation even breed outside of their racial grouping creating a new sub group which is already occurring, an undesirable negative consequence for human evolvement resulting in what is termed Mixed Race or Cross Bred human specimens, a commonality that exists with animals.

I would strongly question whether it would improve the human gene pool; I would liken it to marrying second cousins. This could be construed as a Racist comment but it is fact. We are told in this New emerging Millennia the truth is no defence. Already we are being catalogued into sub groups. I have been slotted into White British; Mr. Eboni up the road has been slotted into black British.

Untested experimentation like this could lead to dire consequences for the gene pool of Europeans but will also in the future challenge medical practise when trying to find a match when transplanting human organs between mixed and non-mixed races.

In this Brave New World there are new laws designed to protect the populace from fear and alarm but does it go as far as to protect ME and my family as Britons when I walk around my streets at dusk or unwittingly enter a NO GO area that resembles Soweto, Dhaka or Mogadishu or alert me when I buy food for my family only to discover that the meat was from an animal that was most cruelly ritually slaughtered which causes ME alarm and frankly offends and disgusts ME.

Where do I fit in, have my feelings been factored in as well?

So what is the intended end game? It is difficult to predict as it depends a great deal if the people realise the true purpose of the creation of this giant European Federal Super State. If they do wake up we would have learnt a timely lesson that there are people that walk among us that considers us as Pawns on a Chess Board, a comparatively small group of people who are so powerful and wealthy they are capable of changing the world to suit their own political grand design for humanity.

The European Federal Super State is the precursor to a single unified Europe stretching from the West coast of Ireland, north to the arctic circle, east to the borders of Russia,  and south?…. well that’s anyone’s guess it could be Turkey it could be Morocco. Nation States WILL disappear, one constitution will fit all. In this century if this madness does not stop it will not be Germany playing Brazil in a football world cup but Europia playing Brazil. Frankly I cannot see countries such as Japan and China being invited to join his brave New World, or India or Russia. 

One should look first at its politicians for this treachery and then most importantly the few people that control the Politicians, Presidents and Prime Ministers.

Is it even possible to dismantle this embryo of Globalism? A world-wide financial crash with the Euro going into meltdown might be Europe’s saviour. It is like a cancer; although the seat of the cancer can be cut out, if it has spread through the whole body intervention is not going to help. Any further discourse on Europe’s future is pure conjecture.

I will not speak for these enemies of the people I will let them speak for themselves.

General Wesley Clark (Kanne) a US presidential candidate, said to CNN during the illegal bombing of Serbia: "There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That is a 19th-century idea, and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states." Clark's father's family was Jewish; his paternal great-grandfather immigrated to the United States from Belarus

On February 17, 1950, James Paul Warburg confidently declared to the United States Senate: “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” James Paul Warburg (1896-1969) was the son of Paul Moritz Warburg, and a nephew of both Felix Warburg and Jacob Schiff, both associated with Kuhn, Loeb & Company which financed the Russian Revolution through James’ brother Max, banker to the government of Germany.

N.B. (Please note the ethnicity of the above persons.)

Arnold Tonybee a federalist Practitioner said at an international gathering in Denmark, ‘We are at present working discreetly but with all our might to wrest this mysterious political force called sovereignty out of the hands of the local nation states of the world. And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands’. Cheysson another federalist practitioner the former French Foreign minister said a few years ago; we could never have constructed Europe by democratic means.

Strobe Talbott, Rhodes Scholar, CFR Director, and Trilateralist,"All countries are basically social arrangements... No matter how permanent or even sacred they may seem at any one time, in fact they are all artificial and temporary... Perhaps national sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all... But it has taken the events in our own wondrous and terrible century to clinch the case for WORLD GOVERNMENT."