Oh Dear, Canada

Oh Dear, Canada.

Justin Trudeau was moved to tears apparently when he recently officially recognized Canada’s historical abuses toward aboriginals, and he is now calling on the Pope to apologize. He was prompted no doubt by the Australian Prime Minister’s apology to the Australian Aborigine for their historical abuses. Australia went one better though, a whole Nation came together and said a combined sorry for the sins of their fathers and a yearly national ‘SORRY DAY’ was implemented. Better late than never one might say.

As far as I am aware there have been no similar apologies and pledges of respect from Rome for their excursions into Olde Albion and their abuses to its first people or apologies from Spain for their bloodthirsty forays into South America.

The tears were triggered by the emotive speech Trudeau made where he admitted “no relationship is more important to me than the one with the First Nation. I will give you my word we will renew and respect that relationship” this was interspersed with sobbing. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has just officially recognized Canada’s historical abuses toward aboriginals, a very humanitarian and Christian of the man wouldn’t you say?

In passing what was that important relationship he identified himself with First Nation, was it before he became a Politician of after?

Putting the First Nation people aside for a moment let me take this pantomime a little further if I may. The Canadian National anthem leads with words ‘our home and native land’, whose native land might that be? Trudeau recently declared, not in the same speech obviously or it would have shown up his true plans for his people that “Canada should NOT be defined any longer by its national identity, ethnicity and language and that immigration is going to be the NORM”

To further confirm this he said “we define a Canadian not by a skin colour or language a religion or a background but by a shared set of values aspirations hopes and dreams that not just Canadians but people around the world share” in other words Canada’s doors are open to the rest of the world and is a small cog in the foundation of a single Global Society.

So who does its ‘home and native land belong’? He has a range of speeches to suit every occasion some without the tears reserved for moving speeches for a captive First Nation audience. These were the words spoken by a ‘proud Canadian’ patriot, their leader waxing lyrical of his people’s bright future, that will NOT be defined any longer by its national identity, ethnicity and language and where immigration is going to be the NORM” so it is open house and “home” to the rest of the world

If a people have NO national identity, ethnicity or language then who are they? While drying the tears from his eyes will he strip the people of the FIRST PEOPLE of who he respects unreservedly of THEIR National Identity or is this only reserved for the Johnny-come-lately’s? Like most politicians does he speak with forked tongue? Are the tears for the press or are the promises to harvest First Nation votes come election time, to who was this representative of the people performing?

He intends to remove the glue that holds his nation his people and culture together as a distinct society. If one cannot identify with an ethnic group or society with a common language and culture then his people are on the road to a dark totalitarian future.

Immigration on a grand scale is the tool to achieve this. I doubt if this directive originated from the Canadian Prime Minister but came from a small Cabal that controls the world’s finances, meets in secret held under the Chatham House rules and shapes the world and its future. He is not singing a solo, which makes one realize these leaders are singing from another song-sheet

So to sum up the question that goes begging is if ‘Canada will NOT be defined any longer by its national identity, ethnicity and language and that immigration is going to be the NORM’ what is its future?

Trudeau may have been invited to a seat at a table that the likes of which you and I will never be invited, reserved for people that are busy shaping a New World. What is taking place in Canada is being replicated throughout the West.

Canada’s future is a mirror of what a One World will look like but the target is only the West, which includes Australia, New Zealand, USA, Europe, and of course the UK. Trudeau confirmed it again when he said “This is something that we are able to do in this country because we define a Canadian not by a skin colour or a language or a religion or a background, but by a shared set of values, aspirations, hopes and dreams that not just Canadians but people around the world share” a globalist future no less, at the same time pledging to take in 25,000 refugees by the end of February, that number would be upped to 50,000 by the end of 2016. He said “Everyone in Canada is waiting to meet you.” and claimed all 10 provinces in Canada are in favour of accepting the flood of refugees.

We must not be too hard on the representative of the Canadian people, the British Prime Minister told HIS people, “it is not Islam that needs to fit in with the British way of life but mainstream Britain that needs to integrate more with the Asian way of life” again was the Muslim vote the draw-card nearing election time. The treachery continues. A Jewish parliamentarian sitting in Westminster once said the English as a race do not exist.

It was the French Prime Minister Sarkozy, who told HIS people that they must change, that there will be dire consequences if they don't, and that not to intermarry with Mulattos is bad for the survival of the country, I would say quite the reverse is true. Thus he amalgamated the concepts of preference for minorities in job hiring with that of the need for the French to intermarry racially.

He declined to follow his lofty principles and decided to ignore the fate of his country and let the devil take the hindmost when he married a tall leggy white female bombshell of the Paris catwalks. I am with him on this one, the choice was not difficult. I ask the question did he also attend any meetings held in secret with planners that control the world’s finances and its future.

The treachery of these representatives of the people is unbelievably staggering and the people meekly follow. Peasants need strong leaders not traitors without any principles.

So to sum up the question that goes begging is if ‘Canada will NOT be defined any longer by its national identity, ethnicity and language and that immigration is going to be the NORM’ who are its people and what is their future?

The really good news coming out of the nations capital Ottawa is that Feb 25 has been designated Hijab Day.

I see a pattern developing here throughout the First World. I was also about to write I see a direct correlation between Canada’s future and that of Sweden but I just stopped myself in time.

To foster and promote uniformity and blind obedience

To foster and promote conformity and blind obedience.

PsysOps it is all around us. It is all encompassing most people are totally unaware it even exists. You are being watched and listened to and generally monitored continually. Remain passive don’t raise your voice or rock the boat, keep your head down remain anonymous you are one of the shepherd’s sheep. An ‘extremist’ could be a patriot, a Nationalist, or a loyalist but is an enemy if he/she is opposed to the government’s view.

There are a very few people in charge controlling millions of people that is why PsyOps exists at all. If your views on Multiculturism (passive Colonization) are opposed to that of the establishment it might be wise to preface a comment with ”I am not a Racist but” without that preface a following comment could be seen as extreme and place you on a data base you are unaware of.

STARTS According to released documents published by The Intercept, a special unit with the British spy agency is involved in psychological operations, or PsyOps, and propaganda campaigns against groups it labels “extremist.”

The documents are the latest from the trove released by whistleblower Edward Snowden. The new documents show that the British Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) operates an elite unit known as the Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group (JTRIG). First revealed last year, JTRIG is known for using sexual “honey traps” to discredit targets, using denial-of-service attacks to shut down Internet chat rooms and control Pro boards.

Despite official claims that JTRIG is focused on international targets in Iran or Afghanistan, the latest information reveals that the unit was focusing on domestic activity within the U.K.—activity typically monitored by local police or domestic law enforcement agencies.

The Intercept reports:

“An August 2009 JTRIG memo entitled ‘Operational Highlights’ boasts of ‘GCHQ’s first serious crime effects operation’ against a website that was identifying police informants and members of a witness protection program. Another operation investigated an Internet forum allegedly ‘used to facilitate and execute online fraud.’ The document also describes GCHQ advice provided ‘to assist the UK negotiating team on climate change.’

“Particularly revealing is a fascinating 42-page document from 2011 detailing JTRIG’s activities. It provides the most comprehensive and sweeping insight to date into the scope of this unit’s extreme methods. Entitled ‘Behavioural Science Support for JTRIG’s Effects and Online HUMINT [Human Intelligence] Operations,’ it describes the types of targets on which the unit focuses, the psychological and behavioural research it commissions and exploits, and its future organizational aspirations. It is authored by a psychologist, Mandeep K. Dhami.”

The documents (Behavioural Science Support for JTRIG’S Effects and Online HUMINT Operations, U.K. Ministry Stakeholder Relationships Spreadsheets) outline tactics employed by the agency, including ways to manipulate public opinion, understand human thinking and behaviour, and encourage conformity.

According to the documents, JTRIG “currently collaborates with other agencies,” including the Metropolitan police, the Security Service (MI5), the Serious Organised Crime Agency.

One of JTRIG’s objectives includes “monitoring ‘domestic extremist groups such as the English Defence League by conducting online HUMINT’; ‘denying, deterring or dissuading’ criminals and ‘hacktivists’; and ‘deterring, disrupting or degrading online consumerism of stolen data or child porn.”

One of the reports from 2011 outlines JTRIG’s tactics, including uploading YouTube videos containing “persuasive communications,” starting Facebook groups and Twitter accounts, and creating fake online personalities and supporters “to discredit, promote dg more troops and funding for the war.”

Indeed, the operations seem crucial to the mission of the United States government (and totalitarian governments around the globe, for that matter).istrust, dissuade, deter, delay or disrupt.” (The BNP/EDL/UKIP/British First, Nick Griffin and anyone opposed to the Government or the status Quo are Narnseys and/or Extremists)

(NB. Israel recently announced a special tuition assistance program for university students who agree to regularly post messages on the internet to combat anti-Semitism and anti-Israel propaganda. A shill attempts to change public opinion by casting doubt in the mind of their readers.)

JTRIG also relies on an understanding of psychology which is “critical” to operations. The unit used social media campaigns to encourage and foster “obedience” and “conformity”. Section 3.6 Obedience, says compliance can be achieved by “engendering liking (attractiveness); instilling a sense of scarcity or secrecy; getting compliance to a small request at first.”

Essentially, the U.K. government is using an elite unit of spies to launch psychological operations on “extremists” by creating fake accounts and videos to promote conformity and obedience. However, the practice is not exclusive to the U.K. PsyOps are used by nations around the world.

The 2002 edition of the Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms defines psychological operations as “integrated employment of the core capabilities of electronic warfare, computer network operations, psychological operations, military deception, and operations security, in concert with specified supporting and related capabilities, to influence, disrupt, corrupt or usurp adversarial human and automated decision making while protecting our own.”

Since that time, PsyOp has fallen out of favour and the term is now officially known as Military Information Support Operations, or MISO. It is defined as “Planned operations to convey selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behaviour of foreign governments, organizations, groups, and individuals in a manner favourable to the originator’s objectives.”

As PsyOp has fallen out of favour and the term is now officially known as Military Information Support Operations, or MISO it follows then as Per Ardua Ad Astra, though adversity to the stars, the motto of Britain’s Royal Air Force so should the MISO’s emblem embrace the dictum “To foster and promote conformity and blind obedience”.

The United States military was famously caught using psychological operations in 2011, when Rolling Stone reported that “the U.S. Army illegally ordered a team of soldiers specializing in ‘psychological operations’ to manipulate visiting American senators into p
“PSYOP [Psychological Operations] are essential to the success of PRC [Population & Resources Control]. For maximum effectiveness, a strong psychological operations effort is directed toward the families of the insurgents and their popular support base. 

The PSYOP aspect of the PRC program tries to make the imposition of control more palatable to the people by relating the necessity of controls to their safety and well-being. PSYOP efforts also try to create a favourable national or local government image and counter the effects of the insurgent propaganda effort.”providin

According to the leaked U.S. Special Forces counterinsurgency manual:

Without a doubt, the U.S. government continues to label its own population “extremist” and is focusing its propaganda efforts domestically. The U.S. Special Forces Counterinsurgency Manual—as well as the new Snowden documents—should is required reading for all revolutionaries seeking to understand the tactics of the U.S. government and indeed all the first World Governments. Only by educating ourselves can we hope to form a united, empowered front against government tyranny.

This article (Britain Using PsyOps Domestically to Encourage “Conformity”) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and theAntiMedia.org. Tune in! Anti-Media Radio airs Monday through Friday @ 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. Help us fix our typos: edits@theantimedia.org

Camp of the Saints.From Prophesy to Reality.

Camp of the Saints

From Prophesy to Reality

It was 1974 the biblical exodus had not yet begun when Jean Raspail wrote his best seller ‘The Camp of the Saints’. Following the withdrawal of French forces after its defeat at Dien Bien Phu in May 1954 was the US defeat in 1964 and it was only after the US withdrawal from Vietnam that refugees were repatriated in an orderly fashion to places like the USA and Australia, the two Western countries involved in that war.

Despite overwhelming US superiority the Vietnamese Liberation forces won because they had support of the people. The America resolve wavered because they LOST the support of their people, that mistake was not going to be made twice. The American Government learnt that lesson very quickly.

The invasion of Iraq and the reshaping of the Middle East would not have had the backing of the American people if not for an event like 9/11 which gives reasonable food for speculation as to the Governments version of events.

One could ask why Iraq was invaded. Iraq had no involvement in 9/11 or Bin Laden’s Taliban all the Bombers were Saudis; America allies. So was the invasion of Iraq purely a ploy for the reshaping of the Middle East?

Doctor Luther King Jnr called the United State “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world” he went on to say “that it is a nation that year after year to spends more money on Military defence than on programmes on social uplift is approaching spiritual death”.

We are discussing refugees here; this is not a synopsis on the moral rights and wrongs of the military machine of the USA. The conflicts that erupted across the Middle East, Israel, Egypt and Palestine after the six day war did not produce a flood of refugees. The Indians that flooded the UK after their banishment by Idi Amin of Uganda were not refugees but displaced persons.

It has always been traditionally accepted it is the Colonist that is required to take the refugee and immigrant overburden in times of crisis as France found with Moroccan displaced persons as did Belgium, Spain and Dutch with their mini colonies and the UK’s Flotsam and Jetsam from their huge empire. But the game plan has changed.

Jean Raspail’s cataclysmic, devastating prophesy that caused the movement of hundreds of thousands of what he termed ‘Ganges Indians’ sailing for Europe in a fleet of boats was the prophesy of what we are seeing as the start of a full-on invasion of monumental proportions.

At present Europe and the UK are experiencing a trickle, a small leak in the dam, even the swamping of Lampedusa and the hundreds of thousands of people looking for a better life and safety marking time in Greece and Hungary are not as the Newspapers say emigrants or asylum seekers but poor displaced people ready to make their way to the richer European countries but by-passing Slovenia, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Slovakia, Albania, Bulgaria and Hungary for Germany, France and the UK.

As a rule Asylum seekers do not pick and choose their country of asylum. It is the first country of safety but these rules do not exist anymore.

At the moment it is NOT following the plot in the Book Camp of the Saints but it will. In the book over a million people from the Indian subcontinent in a flotilla of boats headed for Europe after being moved on by the Egyptians. At present we are only seeing hundreds of thousands……… that will change.

The EU the UN, the world council of churches the Unions, Human Rights activists, Amnesty International, the controlled media all call for compassion and human understanding for these millions of starving and displaced people having no idea what was about to overtake their generosity. We are not facing this situation just yet and I will not spoil the book by divulging any more of the plot. I did read a disturbing possibility into Raspail’s story of how the numbers of people desperately forcing their way in Europe might be TRIPLED.

I did put this scenario to a discussion once. ‘’What if ‘’ a Steamer filled to the gunwales with human misery suddenly appears off the South Coast of the UK with initially 30 thousand poor “North Africans” looking to share in the riches of the West, Like in Raspail’s book the UK government are aware of the movement of the ship and the flotilla that will follow but cannot turn them back until they arrive on British shores.

When the steamer arrives because of its poor condition it is not capable of returning them home anyway. The thousands of invaders from failed Africa countries are not going anywhere.

True to form the European Union reminds its occupied countries as well as the UK of their duty to show human compassion and understanding as did The UNHCR the United Nations Refugee Council, appealing to the western world only which also includes Canada, Australia and New Zealand but which does not include China or Japan or rich oil nations to accept as many fleeing people as possible on humanitarian grounds.

Passing through the Bay of Bengal there are another dozen ships joining the flotilla weighed down with a million Africans looking for a better life after receiving news the boats are not being turned back. The EU pressurizes its occupied countries to share in the resettlement of the fleeing people.

When one Million plus desperate people turn up on a county’s shores how do you drive them away? They cannot be turned away. Read Raspail’s ‘Camp of the Saints’ it could be a glimpse into our future. This is not an impossible scenario.

Germany who was quick to criticize countries within the EU for closing their borders to the rush of immigrants not realizing the scale of this human exodus have now closed theirs. There is no world-wide reaction to Israel putting up a wall to protect itself.

We must understand this huge exodus was caused initially by the invasion of Iraq by the “Coalition of the Willing” and like a domino took out Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria and killed and displaced millions of people.

Of Mice and Polar Bears.

Of Mice and Polar Bears

The MV Windrush docked at Tilbury on June 22 1948 and 493 West Indians disgorged themselves supposedly to help replace the hundreds and thousands if not millions of our own people that sacrificed their lives in WW2 to make this country....wait for it, er ... a ‘Country fit for Heroes’. I had to add that bit of nonsense for no other reason than to add black humour to this article. It was a ploy our Government used to entice our young men and women to sacrifice their lives for their country.

Now the replacements COULD have been Mongolians, Hottentots, Kalahari Bushmen or even Pygmies, but they weren’t……….. No, but they COULD have been couldn’t they?

Now it does not take an Einstein to understand that 493 West Indians are going to have their work cut our replacing millions of Britons so the replacement was going to take years and years, was England eventually going to be the first West Indian country situated in Europe if not where were the other replacements coming from, were they going to be displaced Europeans?

I was reminded of the time our two year old daughter was passing through the Hamster stage of her life; I think it was a fox that cruelly took them from her. She decided the logical progression was to replace them with Mice.

The pet shop owner assured us the two Mice we were about to purchase were Girls; they were not because shortly after they surprised us with about a dozen baby mice. The boys were biting the tails off the Girls or vicky verky. We spent a half hour turning them upside down and with helpful advice from my wife scrutinizing their nether regions separated the boys from the girls into separate laundry tubs.

We took them to the pet shop. I pointed out my wife was extremely cross and it was also devastating for our two year old. Here was absolute and undeniable proof they were not all girls and it was NOT our job to determine the sex of our purchase, we were not the professionals here. The proprietor happily agreed to take the lot. I think he had profits in mind. What has this got to do with the MV Windrush you ask?

By the mouse analogy I am going to try and explain the replacement of our people by default. As my wife pointed out it is important, no it is imperative to take into account the breeding rates of the invitees and she knows what she is talking about. On reflection it could go a long way to vindicate her apparent reluctance or disinterest to partake of the fruits of….…..er doesn’t matter. Perhaps to put it another way it could go part way to explain why we only have only two children and not two hundred.

Since the Windrush graced our shores at Tilbury we have invited many more Third World young breeding pairs to join us without due care and attention to their breeding rates. It is possible we were naïve and assumed every race’s replacement rates were similar to ours. Our government should have twigged this anomaly of different breeding rates with China’s population sitting around 1.3 Billion, mind you that was last Tuesday and ours approx. 64 Million aided by an added boost by Third World invitees.

Right, that has set the scene. Now 60 Million people died during WW2, as an aside that is close to the population of Great Britain. This figure could change alarmingly this time next year when a new batch of Dhoti wearing bearded strangers, wearing Turbans and clutching British Passports arrive at Heathrow, totally disorientated and wondering on what planet in the Solar system they have arrived.

So what is worrying about falling birth rates and who attends to replacement rates, how best to clarify this?

If my daughter had say 12 Mice of various sexes, at the end of 20 years and assuming she was still unmarried and living at home we could have roughly 52,000 mice in the house maybe more, and that would give us real cause for concern, but by the same token we would also have cause to worry through lack of replacements rates if we had a pair of Polar Bears living in the spare bedroom  and only one offspring in 20 years; still with me?

I know what you are thinking why we would have a pair of Polar bears in the house. Its immaterial they could be Panda’s or Brown Bears, it really doesn't matter. By the same token why would we have 52,000 mice in the house, makes little difference the breeding pair of Mice started it all. Bear with me….bear with me, that’s a pun! I am trying to explain replacements numbers here using everyday understandable explanations.

The Internet abounds with horror stories of low replacement rates, mainly ours. It is very much like the story of the Mice and the Polar bears. We the indigenous people are the Polar bears, the replacements are the Mice. I cannot make it plainer than that.

Now if our leaders have Globalization in mind for us all what has replacement numbers got to do with anything we will all be the same, we are all just humans, tribalism and identity will cease to exist, replacements could be anything and anyone, we will just be a Multi-coloured Alphabet soup of consumers, our purpose is to obey and In time our collective sub group, presently White British will have no meaning.

I am not absolutely sure what is the correlation between British and English, I used to know. A “British”politician said the English as a race should not exist which I thought rather strange as they were the bulk of the people I thought were going to inherit this “land fit for heroes”

Globalization means conformity, uniformity, no ethnic distinction that is the Wests future, that is the aim the Wests Governments are working towards, Obama said so, so did Mr Bliar, Mr Brown, Mr Clinton, Mr Cameron and that horrible Clinton woman and most if not all the unelected kommissars of the European Union.

The strategy is the Pawns first move is to D4 that's a Multicultural society that has been achieved. Checkmate will cement the world into a Globalised society.

There is no point in going into any depth of falling birth rates especially in Europe but it is interesting to note The United States is the ONLY developed country with a healthy fertility rate. Why is that you ask. Well since 1990 60% of U.S population growth has come from immigrants and their children. That is the reason the US is the ONLY developed country with a healthy fertility rate. Surely that would apply to the UK, well it is rapidly moving that way. Replacement rates are outstripping falling birth rates but by persons of colour. I did not figure this out the Government demographers did.

This is the disturbing part, that figure of 80% of the population growth in Europe has also come from migrants, mainly disciples of Allah which means although the replacement figure for European countries is dropping the residual slack is being taken up by immigrants with devil-may-care attitude to family planning from countries with high birth rates. In 12 EU countries the fertility rate is below Replacement Level.

Within a generation this situation will unfold throughout Europe. So what is staring Europe in the face is a total demographic change before the middle of this century and many of these European counties are below replacement level.

An interesting comment to surprise and amaze your guests at your next dinner party is there are more pets, especially dogs, than children in Japan. In Latvia there are more deaths than births 1989 – 2002 a 13% population decrease. Within a generation this situation will continue to unfold throughout Europe and as forecast its rich cultures will disappear. Our leaders were never about to make this country a place ”fit for heroes” that was a ploy, they were always planning to change Europe beyond recognition by destroying National and ethnic identity forever, a tribute to our fallen no doubt.

Cue Music … Drum Roll Last Post, Roll closing captions fade to black, last one turn out the light.

Rotherham, City of Dreams

Before Colonization.

Rotherham; City of Dreams.

The BBC has not yet chosen to televise another programme in the series of ‘City of Dreams’ so I thought I would pre-empt their transmission of “Rotherham, City of Dreams”. Like “Bradford, City of Dreams” which the BBC did televise was centred around poor immigrant people from the Third World that realised their dreams in Bradford in Kebab shops, Curry Houses and cab driving and whose numbers are so great they are now displacing the indigenous people on a Tibetan scale. This is forced diversity the BBC might say is on a ‘Grand Scale’.

The politically motivated events that were finally uncovered in the northern City of Rotherham was a disgusting betrayal of its own children to hide the sexual abuse and rape of over 1400 children by immigrant Pakistani sexual predators to assure the council  of the Moslem vote for the Rotherham dominated Labour party, events that were deliberately covered up by the police and Children’s services to avoid racial tension prior to an election.

In Rotherham unemployment is high and many residents are long-term sick or disabled, according to the 2011 Census. Nearly a third of the work-force has no qualifications. There are a large percentage of council homes. It is however a magnet for the poor of the world to achieve their Dreams.

Briefly, in the early Industrial Revolution major uses of iron demanded good local ore and established processing skills for iron strength, qualities found in Rotherham's smelting plants and foundries. Iron, and later steel, became the principal industry in Rotherham, surviving into the 20th century. Milling grain into flour was a traditional industry in Rotherham, formerly in the Millmoor area; hence Rotherham United F.C.'s nickname "The Millers".

Because of Rotherham’s current claim to fame the BBC might be understandingly reluctant to highlight the rich Multicultural tapestry brought to the town by the unfulfilled dreams of poor people from rural Tribal areas of Northern Pakistan who fled poverty and privation hoping to find safety and succour in this northern English town of Rotherham and as an unexpected added bonus by the authorities turning a blind eye allowing them to sexually sate themselves on the last count, on the bodies of over Fourteen hundred young underage English girls.

The effect still ripples today as the Police, the ones who were NOT complicit or who were NOT stood down, are uncovering more and more cases of child sex grooming and rape by immigrants whose accepted standards of behaviour are so primitive and alien to our own.

But the worst is yet to come. These children’s bodies were sacrificed solely to protect the results of a coming election, a seat the Labour Party hoped retain. Let us just dissect the systematic sexual grooming and deflowering of over a thousand four hundred children by these Pakistani dreamers.

The report went ‘Police withheld bombshell report revealing how gangs of Muslim men were grooming schoolgirls as young as 13 in case it inflamed racial tensions ahead of General Election’. And ’Police and social workers in the South Yorkshire town were accused of being too concerned about being labelled racist to speak out about the crimes involving 1,400 children’

Children’s Services concurred. Their sole purpose is to protect vulnerable children but decided to keep quiet about them being mass raped. The council's director of children's services, Joyce Thacker left the authority by mutual agreement.

Shaun Wright, the Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) for South Yorkshire from 2012, was the Labour councillor in charge of child safety at the council for five years from 2005-10. He initially refused demands to resign as PCC from the Home Secretary.

The former Chief Constable, Meredydd Hughes, who served from 2004 to 2011 and who had unsuccessfully stood for the Labour Party nomination in the Police Crime Commissioner elections, was told by Labour MP Keith Vaz that he had 'failed' abuse victims.

Following the report's publication, the Council Leader, Roger Stone of the Labour Party, resigned.

Labour Councillors Gwendoline Russell, Shaukat Ali and former Council Leader Roger Stone were suspended from the Labour Party, as was former Deputy Council Leader Jahangir Akhtar and further allegations of a cover-up, including the theft of documents from a council researcher's office.

In July 2014 the town's mayor Barry Dodson quit over separate claims he sexually abused a 13-year-old girl in 1987. He did not comment on the claims

It emerged that the massive inquiry into the Rotherham sex abuse scandal could run until at least 2018 and has so far identified 300 suspects. Investigators say the number of possible offenders is changing on a ‘daily basis’ and they suspect ‘thousands of offences’ have been committed. The team has seized 92 boxes containing several thousand files and identified more than 3,300 lines of inquiry. The figures of child rape could be in the numbers of five figures.

The suspects are ‘predominantly’ Asian men from the South Yorkshire town and include two who have worked for the council. Their victims are mainly white, British, underage and ‘vulnerable’ girls. Operation Stovewood is currently costing up to £5million every year, and is still likely to be ongoing in three years’ time – putting the total bill for the inquiry at around £15million. So far the inquiry has backed an original estimate that 1,400 girls were abused in Rotherham during a 16-year period from 1997 to 2013.

Half of all victims, who were from Birmingham, Dudley and Walsall, lived with their parents, while 41 per cent were in care. Police pin-pointed 75 grooming suspects most with a history of sexual violence with most being from a Muslim background from Birmingham. The report stated: 'the vast majority of identified suspects (79 per cent) are Asian (59 of 75), five per cent are African Caribbean. 62 per cent of Asian suspects are of Pakistani origin. 'Pakistani males account for half of all identified suspects in the force (37 of 75).

'There is strong evidence in the vast majority of all cases that the victims are enticed, stupefied or controlled by alcohol and a mixture of controlled drugs. 'The victims are already suffering from health conditions relating to their chaotic lifestyle and exploitation (Pregnancy, termination, STDs, neglect, and physical and psychological problems).'Bear in mind we are talking about children here.

The child rape cover-up was supposed to protect the poll results that were was held on May 7. 2015 it was nothing more than a replay of the vendetta against Nick Griffin when he was arrested at his home in Wales on suspicion of incitement to racial hatred, over remarks he made about Islam in an undercover BBC documentary titled The Secret Agent. He was questioned at a police station in Halifax, West Yorkshire, before being freed on police bail.

He said that the arrest was "an electoral scam to get the Muslim block vote back to the Labour party and that the Labour government was attempting to influence the results of the following year's general election” Sound familiar?

This is the disgusting state of British Politics today, the sacrifice of 1400 children’s bodies in exchange for the Moslem vote.

Let us not dismiss the Paedophilia at the highest level within government with the bulk of the offenders’ members of the Labour party. Please google… Labour25 the dreadful disclosures that the incumbent party in power, the Labour Party obscured this mass rape purely to win an election defies belief. So how did this affect the result of the 2015 Election after this mind-blowing disclosure?

Labour Candidate …….19, 800 votes

Jane Collins ……………….11, 414 votes

Sebastian Lowe ………… 4,656 votes

Labour easily holds the seat of Rotherham.

The Stockholm syndrome or capture bonding is a psychological phenomenon in which Hostages express empathy and sympathy and have positive feelings toward their captors, sometimes to the point of defending and identifying with the captors.

One commonly used hypothesis to explain the effect of Stockholm syndrome is based on Freudian theory. It suggests that the bonding is the individual's response to trauma in becoming a victim. Identifying with the aggressor is one way that the ego defends itself. When a victim believes the same values as the aggressor, they cease to be perceived as a threat.

Were the people of Rotherham victims suffering from this phenomenon? Why vote for a Political Party that allowed Paedophilia to flourish just to massage the numbers in a Political election, what madness were the authorities and the Police suffering from to close their eyes to mass rape of Rotherham’s own children. This is the dark side of diversity for diversities sake.

The indigenous people also have a lot to answer for voting the Labour Party back in power by voting for more of the same for their children.

I pray this article gives a truer picture than the one the controlled MSM portray of the Rotherham mass rape and that it remains on an Internet data base for reference for future scholars when researching Great Britain’s descent from days of Empire into something resembling a politically and demographically third world country look-a-like.

Globalism, The Death of Nationalism

       Globalism; the Death of Nationalism.

Extremely powerful and influential people have decided a New Society, a New World will be established, a truly centralised society, where Governance, directives and planning emanate from a central authority. This is new and not even the defunct USSR was truly comparable. The embryo of this New Order can be seen with the birth of the European Union, the only similarity with the USSR was that the Soviet example was regional whereas this is the foundation for the plan for Globalization not just of Europe, Europe is the cradle of the Globalism experiment; America is the Puppet-master.

The fundamental requirement for this order to even begin to succeed was the destruction of what we understand as Nationalism. It was seen as a final left-over of more primitive times of tribalism, or a social system where similar society is divided into small closely independent sub-groups called tribes having a strong feeling of identity and loyalty within the groups.

It can be said that tribalism, thus racism is nurtured by Nationalism and has in the past been responsible for the exaltation of one tribe above another. Ayn Rand said ‘Tribalism is a dominant element in Europe, as a reciprocally reinforcing cause and result of Europe’s long history of caste systems, of national and local (provincial) chauvinism, of rule by brute force and endless, bloody wars.”

Importantly “Tribalism had no place in the United States—until recent decades. It could not take root there, its imported seedlings were withering away and turning to slag in the melting pot whose fire was fed by two inexhaustible sources of energy: individual rights and objective law; these two were the only protection man needed.”

A tribal system was established thousands of years ago when Homo sapiens had begun to walk upright and were forming social groups. When humans appeared on this earth it was natural protection to join an chosen group, the group into which you were born, the group to which you were predestined to belong by the sovereign, omnipotent, omniscient power of your body chemistry and language.

Ayn Rand also wrote “If men accept the notion that the individual is helpless, intellectually and morally, that he has no mind and no rights, that he is nothing, but the group is all, and his only moral significance lies in selfless service to the group—they will be pulled obediently to join a group” This of course is racism. If your group is small enough, it will not be called “racism”: it will be called “ethnicity.” Incidentally Ayn Rand was much against any form of Nationalism as the cause of all European wars.

Ayn Rand was born in St. Petersburg, Russia, During her high school years, she was eyewitness to both the Kerensky Revolution, which she supported, and—in 1917—the Bolshevik Revolution, which she denounced from the outset. In order to escape the fighting, her family went to the Crimea, where she finished high school. The final Communist victory brought the confiscation of her father’s pharmacy and periods of near-starvation.

In late 1925 she obtained permission to leave Soviet Russia for a visit to relatives in the United States. Although she told Soviet authorities that her visit would be short, she was determined never to return to Russia. Maybe Miss Rand should have concentrated more on the drawbacks of Soviet Communism rather than the inadequacies of European Nationalism. It was not Nationalism that made her flee Russia.

It was in the 18th century a relatively small group of Jewish Marxist thinkers decided for us that this system that has served humans for decades despite its faults has to change. It was not going to be destroyed overnight, but it goes without saying it was critical that before a New Order can be established any social order that smacks of Tribalism, Nationalism, Identity and loyalty within a group or Nation State has to be destroyed, it is the antipathy of Globalism.

At the end of WW2 there was no better time for this reshaping of Society, Europe was in ruins. One positive method of the destruction of a homogenous societal group is to fragment it by the mixing of non-homogenous tribes in huge numbers as is happening now throughout Europe and the West, tribes whose language and cultures and standard of accepted behaviour are so alien to our own. This huge movement of people commenced almost immediately after WW2 the first time the movement of numbers of people of this magnitude were seen in European history. It was planned this way.

The Social system we have had for many decades at this very moment is changing, it is deliberate, it is planned and nothing will stop it succeeding. We are moving to a Globalised society, many of the Western World leaders have said Globalism is the future. It WILL be an authoritarian regime where individual freedoms will barely exist. It will be Orwell prophesies fulfilled, there will be blind obedience to authority with a World Police Mechanism put in place to ensure adherence to this blind obedience.

It explains why any Political group, social pressure group that values its  tribal connection and ethnic identity is vilified and crucified by the TV Media and the compliant press particularly the Government owned Broadcasting stations. Too much time, effort, money and political intrigue has gone into this for it to fail now.

With Globalization things you take for granted like a national flag, being able to identify with a National group the ability to lay first claim to your homeland, even your stories and history might have to be changed or deleted to suit the narrative even poems, hymns and the lyrics of songs deemed to be triumphant and racially divisive will be sanitised as George Orwell forecasted as is happening now.

It has taken us a long time to understand that Democratic elections achieve nothing at the ballot box, it is rigged. Three catastrophic events can break this satanic cycle of a futuristic world dictatorship. First is a total financial breakdown, secondly a breakdown of societal order when the people wake up to the fact that their freedoms of speech and association are being curtailed which is happening in most European countries and thirdly and most likely, violent disorder among non-European religious and tribal groups in order to establish a regional authorities which could erupt into a Holy War.

Islam is not going to sacrifice its biblical tribal existence to a Global society it does not rule even in Europe thus the strident cry of Sharia for Europe.

The Brigands who call the shots in the European Union regard Nationalist voices such as The True Finns, the French Front Nationale, BNP, Jobbik, Golden Dawn, Sweden Democrats, Dutch Party for Freedom, UKIP and many others as Narnsey parties. They are the Globalists mortal enemies. The purpose of the print and TV Media and the spoken word is to crucify Nationalist feelings; Globalism is the world’s future.

If the ability to relate to  a tribal group is destroyed then the Europe our ancestors knew of countries, nationalities, ethnicities will cease to exist as will , Counties, Shires, prefectures, cantons, provinces, communities and regions. They all imply regional loyalties and ethnic groupings. Globalization will also call for larger areas of governance and will emanate from a Central Authority and like a Spider in a Spiders web orders will radiate out from the hub and global order without question will be kept in check by a Global Police Force.

A system that has no pretence of being democratic will not hold elections although at a regional level I do see a local area administrator who is translating orders directly from the Central Authority will be able to be removed.

By the beginning of the 22nd century if the people meekly accept the New Order it might be too late to stop it and those few voices opposing the new order might find because of their resentment a short stay in a Gulag for re-education.

The Atlantic Philanthropists

The Atlantic Philanthropists.

It is always wise advice to pay attention to the old adage ‘Follow the Money’.

The comment was, “The referendum in Ireland passed because an American pro-Gay Lobby’s donation from Atlantic Philanthropists massively funded a sophisticated pro-gay campaign spanning more than a decade”

I cannot vouch for the accusation of this organisation being Pro Gay. Let us accept they are a genuine American philanthropic organization, a very applaudable quality in our society and to paraphrase their aims “the work that Atlantic Philanthropies has done to tackle division and SOCIAL EXCLUSION has done much to further our efforts to create an equal and fair society in Northern Ireland.

“Social exclusion” was the trigger.

Social Inclusion can mean different things to different people including people whose standards of accepted human behaviour up until now was at odds with many others who regard the standards of behaviour of these non-inclusive people as abnormal in a civilised society.

Who gets to choose who to include in this Social Inclusion but more importantly what is the sinister end purpose of this sudden change in deciding which group of social pariahs skirting the fringes of society to include?

Social inclusion also means cultures being forced to live together whether culturally similar or not. In many countries in Europe the people have no voice on forced Multiculturism, they are required to include anyone in their culture whether culturally similar or not. Imagine if you will Hindus being forced to live with Moslems or a Shia being forced to integrate with Baathists. Simply put, Eastern Cultures are not forced to culturally mix but European nations are.

The Rohingya people have been described as among the world’s least wanted. They have been denied Burmese citizenship since the Burmese nationality law was enacted. Imagine the resentment of the Burmese people if their government forced the people to culturally mix with the Rohingya. Culturally the Rohingya people are BanglaDeshis who are Moslem. The Burmese are Theravada Buddhist. They are not FORCED to be culturally inclusive as are the European nations who are forced to integrate with Eastern cultures.

A typical Rohingya family has four or five surviving children but the numbers up to TWENTY EIGHT have been recorded in rare cases, sound at all familiar?

I assume prior to the Homosexual Referendum it was not a fair and equal society in Eire. The question that goes begging is why would the American Atlantic Philanthropies fund the Homosexual lobby in Eire? 

Has it only been the plight of Homosexuals who until recently been the victims of social exclusion, why haven’t the plight of say BBC employed Necrophiliacs and/or religious Paedophiles and child rapists who have been pushed out to the margins of our society whose lack of inclusion has not been taken into account.

Who are “Atlantic philanthropies”? It was founded by Ex-billionaire Chuck Feeney who gave the last of his fortune to Northern Ireland.  

In Eire’s referendum it was the church that was crucified…where was GOD?

Now if I were to give $60 Million to an organisation I would like something in return. If I were following the Frankfurt School of critical thinking and one of its aims is the break-up of the family unit, funding a Homosexual agenda would be $60 Million well spent.

The Frankfurt School was associated in part with the Institute for Social Research at the Goethe University. As an aside most of its “Critical Thinkers” were Marxists Jewish intellectuals.

Mr Feeney’s “giving while living” philosophy is believed to be the brainchild behind Warren Buffett and Bill and Melinda Gates’s charitable organisations. Those two names ~immediately set alarm bells instantly ringing. What charities do they fund?

I connect those above names to the shadowy Bilderberger group. I have read that the Bilderberg meeting has become too main-stream for some of the world’s richest elite. From Warren Buffet and Monsanto-linked Bill Gates to Oprah and Jeb Bush, the local media has begun reporting on a closed doors meeting between billionaires and politicians. I am led to believe the main items on the Bilderberger agenda is Globalisation followed closely by overpopulation.

Social Cohesion and Globalisation are bedfellows. They are the fish that goes with the chips, the Bacon that goes with the Egg. Social inclusion and the rapid change of European demographics cannot be discussed in isolation; Social inclusion is used as a weapon to forcibly marginalise specific European groups by importing millions of Third World, poverty ridden people at the same time enacting laws that forbid the colonized protesting at their own fragmentation, Race or ethnicity is being surgically destroyed. 

Those that oppose inclusivity in European society are considered Racists and that accusation frightens the life out of most people.

It was his unfamiliarity or deliberate ignoring of ‘Social Inclusivity’ that found Brian True-May ITV producer of ‘Midsomer Murders’ join the ranks of the millions of unemployed when he chose to ignore the ratio of 4:1 of Blackamores to indigenous natives required in all BBC and CH4 TV Drama.

Again it is ‘Social Inclusion’ that no doubt prompted a Mr Sarkozy of France to suggest that French women should to marry Africans but he chose to marry a Gallic female bombshell that graced the Model Catwalks of Paris. It was a Mr Gary Dyke an EX Director of the BBC who to his horror noted the lack of inclusivity that prompted him the refer to his BBC work-mates as being ‘Hideously White’ It is inclusivity that is shaping Great Britain’s future which is its demise in slow motion as a homogenous Caucasian nation.

If you find aspects of Social Inclusivity negative you could qualify as a Racist, Homophobic, Islamaphobic and many other phobias attributable to doubters or deniers.

The news item read Ex-billionaire Chuck Feeney gives last of fortune to Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland First Minister Peter Robinson and Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness made the announcement in Belfast, announcing that it would more than match the donation — providing $60 million towards the programs outlined.

The only outline I have seen so far is make “Gayness” a way of life in Eire and marginalise heterosexuality and the sanctity of marriage which to aggressive feminists was only a social construct anyway. The people voted not for same sex ‘marriage’ but for total separation of the sacredness of Marriage and the church. 

So Atlantic Philanthropies may well have a Globalist agenda and the destruction of religion. Religion might be fakery and superstition but it binds a nation together.

A speaker at a Sex Education Symposium in Liverpool outlined tactics of sex education saying: 'if we do not get into sex education, children will simply follow the mores of their parents'. The fact that sex education was to be the vehicle for peddlers of secular humanism soon became apparent. I take it the ‘mores’ of the parents is the sanctity of marriage and heterosexuality.

It is also interesting to note that corporate Australia took out a full page newspaper ad championing a similar Homosexual referendum in Australia soon after the stunning victory of men ‘marrying’ men and women ‘marrying’ women in Eire. 

They include Westpac banks. ANZ Banking. Foxtel. Google. OPTUS, P&O, QANTAS, Slater and Gordon Solicitors. David Jones Stores, Carnival Lines and many others. Does it come as any surprise the Australian opposition labour leader and the Greens are aggressively pushing the Homosexual agenda?

Incidentally Sydney, Australia has the highest number of Rainbow people after San Francisco and once a year hold a massive festival to celebrate Homosexuality called Gay Pride Week with many coloured floats reminiscent of South American festivals. So a referendum in Australia I suspect will vote yes for same sex marriages.

It is non debatable, same sex marriages and the adoption of children is akin to introducing crocodiles to a swimming pool.

Now I realise it is grossly unfair to use Sweden as a yardstick to gauge anything that makes any sense at all. but true to this statement the use of the gender-neutral pronoun came to international attention when the teachers at a Stockholm preschool decided to voluntarily stop using gender specific terms when addressing their pupils, and instead use the word ‘hen’ and ‘Hon’ in order to promote equality amongst their kids. Why not try Mickey and Mouse?

The unexpected spin off of the Irish referendum is that Sodomy even though not illegal prior to the referendum now through overwhelming popular vote is now accepted as normal a life choice even for non- rainbow people, as canoeing and/or breeding rabbits. We as humans have come a long way.

Rhonda and the Gardner

"Come in Miss Appleton keeping well, please take a chair. I see BBC Drama have sent you over for initial discussions re your book”

“Yes, that’s right”

“I understand they intend adapting your children’s book as a TV Series. What’s the title of the book”? 

“Rhonda and the Gardner”

“Yes, Rhonda and the Gardner; now I believe it is set in the 1930’s, is that right”?

“Yes, the story is set in a very expensive boarding school for genteel young ladies, from well to do privileged families whose allegiance is to England, the flag, the English way of life, its traditions, customs, history, the King and the empire…......... well when we used to have an empire that is” 

“Right! First off I can already foresee a small problem here”

“In what way”?

“Well we are obliged to use black children in the production”

“But hang on; this is set in the 1930’s in a small English seaside village. I hadn’t included any black children, because there weren’t any” 

“Be that as it may, but we will still have to include 4 Caribbean’s and two Asians”

“But that will kill the authenticity of the whole story”

“Sorry BBC policy, 4 Caribs and two Asians”

“Now Simon, I am not a racist but…......” 

''Let me interrupt you there Miss Appleton, none of us are racists but…that’s the rule"

“Now look here treasure, I don’t want to appear flippant, but by the same token the Headmaster in my story might just as well be a stark naked Papuan Elder wearing exotic bird feathers with a bone through his nose and sporting a penis sheath for Christs sake” 

“That’s very true Miss Appleton, and that is certainly a possibility that I and the program people cannot rule out and most certainly will explore at a later date” 

“You are making a complete mockery of my whole story”

“Well as a conciliatory gesture let us see if we can meet you half way here, as a small compromise what if we change the location of the school to Birmingham set it in the 21st century in a government school, and then we can easily accommodate hundreds of kids of color”? 

“You are totally mad. Haven't you read my book”?

"Well I am sorry Miss Appleton, love to help you, but if we can’t insert a half a dozen of kids of color it can't go to air simple as that... BBC policy"