Rhonda and the Gardner

"Come in Miss Appleton keeping well, please take a chair. I see BBC Drama have sent you over for initial discussions re your book”

“Yes, that’s right”

“I understand they intend adapting your children’s book as a TV Series. What’s the title of the book”? 

“Rhonda and the Gardner”

“Yes, Rhonda and the Gardner; now I believe it is set in the 1930’s, is that right”?

“Yes, the story is set in a very expensive boarding school for genteel young ladies, from well to do privileged families whose allegiance is to England, the flag, the English way of life, its traditions, customs, history, the King and the empire…......... well when we used to have an empire that is” 

“Right! First off I can already foresee a small problem here”

“In what way”?

“Well we are obliged to use black children in the production”

“But hang on; this is set in the 1930’s in a small English seaside village. I hadn’t included any black children, because there weren’t any” 

“Be that as it may, but we will still have to include 4 Caribbean’s and two Asians”

“But that will kill the authenticity of the whole story”

“Sorry BBC policy, 4 Caribs and two Asians”

“Now Simon, I am not a racist but…......” 

''Let me interrupt you there Miss Appleton, none of us are racists but…that’s the rule"

“Now look here treasure, I don’t want to appear flippant, but by the same token the Headmaster in my story might just as well be a stark naked Papuan Elder wearing exotic bird feathers with a bone through his nose and sporting a penis sheath for Christs sake” 

“That’s very true Miss Appleton, and that is certainly a possibility that I and the program people cannot rule out and most certainly will explore at a later date” 

“You are making a complete mockery of my whole story”

“Well as a conciliatory gesture let us see if we can meet you half way here, as a small compromise what if we change the location of the school to Birmingham set it in the 21st century in a government school, and then we can easily accommodate hundreds of kids of color”? 

“You are totally mad. Haven't you read my book”?

"Well I am sorry Miss Appleton, love to help you, but if we can’t insert a half a dozen of kids of color it can't go to air simple as that... BBC policy"

Eire's Jubilation

Eire’s Jubilation.

on the Slippery Slope
or Perhaps the thin Edge of the Wedge 

I said to the young girl in the newsagent “I have just arrived from the far side of Ursa Minor and I would like to purchase a bottle of ink please”. As an afterthought I said with mock humour “while you are at it perhaps you can toss in a couple of quills”

She was a bright girl and immediately realised I was joking about the quills. The ink was a different matter though. She led took me to a tray of Biros. Surprised I said “No! No! No!  I want the ink outside of the pen, like separately in a bottle”

I leaned close , Her perfume was heady; I suspect it was Columbian Poppy. I whispered confidentially “before Biros were invented as a lad we used to have inkwells in school and we used to dip things called nibs in them, adding “we also used to impregnate a rolled up piece of paper in the ink and then utilising an elastic band we would flick an inked missile at the neck of the boy a few rows in front” 

She looked at me wide eyed and puzzled no doubt thinking perhaps I do come from Ursa Minor.

Well the quills were just a jest, but as regards the bottle of ink she suggested a visit to a Multi-Global Corporation or do I mean monopoly that put all the small suppliers of office equipment out of business.

She appeared on the surface to be a clever girl, not unattractive, short skirt, slightly dumpy, about 4 foot something, dark eyes with glasses. The good news she was no more than 40 years younger than me, I would have liked to have asked her out but my wife would have had something to say about that as she did about on-line dating....so I didn’t. Hang on I will get to the point in a minute.

In one person’s lifetime I am having trouble buying ink, but it is not that that troubles me so much.

So at what point are we with human evolution? Through human endeavour and ingenuity we have sent probes to Pluto, men have walked on the moon and at the moment NASA are rounding up about a dozen or so people to take a one way trip to Mars all expenses paid. 

But back on earth the long wait is over for Mr and Mrs O’Leary, they were always nervous about their son Eugene and his strange relationship with Francis but the result of the Irish vote means that finally Eugene and Francis can now plan their ‘Marriage’ with the full backing of the establishment and the law.

They both emerged from the closet or lavatory quite a while ago and can now start on the long journey of joyful marital bliss. However there is a minor problem that was pointed out by Mrs. O’Leary and quite rightly so that same sex homosexual married couples cannot produce babies, so in theory they should in time all die out……the same sex couples not the babies.

There were always going to be questions asked by bigoted, homophobic people opposed to same sex relationships, for instance who on their wedding night gets to do what to whom and how. At dances who gets to dance backwards and when introducing your friend what determines who gets to be introduced as the wife or husband and being introduced to Royalty who gets to curtsy and who gets to bow, it all has to be thrashed out.

Personally I believe it is the result of something being added to the water. It does not concern me unless Homosexuality is made compulsory. 

With Eugene and Francis the subject of children has not been broached. The chances of Mr and Mrs O’ Leary becoming proud grandparents are looking slim……… extremely slim unless Mrs Flannery the next door neighbour who voted YES agreed to become a surrogate mother, a problem although not insurmountable at age 74 could cause problems. Again with full equality in mind, which of the married male couple will be game enough to attempt to impregnate Mrs Flannery?

Without wanting to appear flippant Homosexuality is not what it’s all cracked up to be, there are distinct disadvantages. However if one does feel the urge to engage in unnatural animal-like sexual practises with one’s own gender then one should seriously consider bisexuality as it immediately doubles your chances for a date on Saturday night.

If the question is asked on a trivia night at your local pub, the answer is the republic of Eire was not the first country to break the stifling shackles of Heterosexuality but was the first to do so by referendum. I must admit by the overwhelmingly result of a yes vote and the overwhelmingly positive result on Homosexual couples being allowed to adopt children I was given to doubt whether more people in Eire were in a Homosexual relationship than a heterosexual relationship. Two words immediately crossed my mind, Frankfurt and Protocols.

An interesting point here, if a heterosexual couple (married or de facto) on retirement receive a lesser old age pension (because they are living as a couple), will this now apply to a ‘married’ homosexual couple, as opposed to receiving two single pensions.

What is the next logical step for the future I hear you say? Well in 2006 a Sudanese man was caught engaging in a ‘sexual activity’ with a Goat although I prefer not to beat about the bush and dispense with Orwell-like correct-speak and say it like it is, ‘FORNICATING’ with said animal and was forced by a judge to “marry” the goat after “deflowering” her…..after WHAT? The goat apparently acquired the name "Rose" during the elders' deliberations. Dowries incidentally were exchanged. 

You can read the full unexpurgated story here http://tinyurl.com/5gor6f. Another man was arrested for also engaging in ‘sexual activity’ with his neighbours Bull Mastiff.

The good lord in his infinite wisdom endowed males and females with distinct but separate, unique and exacting sexual specifications as regards the layout of their private parts and I might add for a very specific purpose, and is not quite the same purpose  as Irish Rainbow couples’ practice with their private parts.

Hopefully Islamic State by the 22nd century will not have swept across the whole of Europe and put to death all the Rainbow people, including those married Irish Homosexual couples who fought for the right to legally fornicate with each other, the Idolaters, Christians, Cartoonists well anyone who does not worship a man who took a 6 year old as his wife. I was heartened to read it was not an uncommon practise in those days as girls matured much earlier. Fair enough I suppose, but for Christ’s sake…SIX?...... FAIR GO!

This world is going mad; Ursa Minor is looking very attractive.

Sharia4 Franchises for Sale

Sharia4 Franchises for Sale

Sharia Enterprises and Merchandising Inc .A Saudi Arabian registered company would like to take this opportunity to offer astute investors the opportunity of joining our parent company Sharia Enterprises (S.A) by taking advantage of the offer of a further release of Sharia4 Franchises. There has been a massive take-up of these Sharia Franchises after the initial float of our first Franchise Sharia4UK, with valuable options quickly snapped up for Sharia4Belgium, Sharia4Holland, Sharia4Sweden and of course Sharia4France. Our first float which attracted international attention was of course Sharia4UK.

It was the free publicity given to us by the media during the demonstrations in London following a protest march outside the Danish Embassy in London on 3 February 2006, held in response to the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy.

We have recently had further interest in Sharia4Norway, tentative inquiries for Sharia4Ukraine and ongoing discussions for Sharia4Denmark.

A Mr Ajem Choudary is at present the spokesman for Islam4UK. His credentials are impeccable. With Omar Bakri Muhammad, he helped form an Islamist organisation, AL-Mushroom. The group organised several anti-Western demonstrations, including a banned protest march in London for which Choudary was summonsed to appear in court. Unfortunately Al-Mushroom was disbanded following the UK government's decision to ban the organization.

We are intensely passionate about Sharia, are you? Then do not hesitate in joining what can only be described as the fastest growing enterprise in Europe and the UK. It is a rock-solid investment that will dwarf all other franchises. It is a complete system that has built an enviable reputation over many decades and has now commenced a long awaited expansion across the whole of Europe. It has always been the preferred ideology throughout Africa and the Middle East and already we are seeing many Christians particularly in African countries many who were initially nervous or reluctant to forsake Christianity for Islam with little persuasion now converting in droves to Islam.

Although at first there was some apprehension about the possibility of social unrest or violence after the float of Sharia4UK, the British police gave us little or no attention, this has given the impetus for interest in the sale of other European Sharia4 franchises.

We would like to emphasise these Franchises are experimental that in essence they are not full-blown Sharia. There is no limb removal or compulsory FGM, lashings, stoning for unbelievers or the hanging of Homosexual Rainbow People at this present time but once Islam is firmly established as the predominate ideology in Europe full Sharia will be implemented.

The work-experience Imam of Sharia4Newham told our reporter they fully expect the Moslem community in the UK to exceed the numbers of Christian believers by 2030. The British Governments own demographers have confirmed it is inevitable due to the unstoppable immigration by people of the Islamic faith combined with the traditional legendary breeding rates of these people. It was pointed out that the timetable of 2030 might appear to be a little overly pessimistic........ or optimistic depending on one's point of view.

We would like to refer you to this interview here:

www.cbn.com/tv/embedplayer.aspx?bcid=1509282970001

There are many smaller Regional franchises still available such as Sharia4Devon, home of a little known British singer Mr Billy Blogg, and Sharia4IsleofWight. His initial interest was for Sharia4Barking but unfortunately many of these smaller Sharia enterprises have already been purchased such as Sharia4Oldham, Sharia4Towerhamlets, Sharia4Dewsbury and of course Sharia4Bradford. Once Islam is in the majority in each of these European countries and the UK the smaller Sharia will be combined and incorporated in the Sharia4EuropeInternational.

Our ever increasing popularity can be seen every day by the mushrooming of Mosques throughout the whole of Europe and plans are already in place to build the largest Mosque in the UK outside of Saudi Arabia which will hopefully seat over 20,000 thousand disciples of Allah. Even in one relatively small English City of Bolton, Islam can boast over 21 mosques with plans for many more aided by the valuable assistance of the local Labour council. Muslim cultural centres, Muslim schools, Mad rassers are also in the planning for villages throughout the Brecon Hills and Anglesea.

We did expect that there would be some resistance by the indigenous Britons but there has been little or no opposition to the suggestion of the introduction of Sharia Law throughout the UK. We suggest you to avoid wasting your hard earned capital on earthly Franchises such as McDonalds, Hungry Jacks or Seven Eleven; they might attract immediate monetary profits but not people’s souls.

We hope in the fullness of time the influence of Islam and its traditional home will move to Europe and its importance rival that of Mecca.

For further information a prospectus will be sent on request.

Children of the International Man.

Children of the “International Man

Or

Understanding the fundamentals.

I will begin by stating the bleeding’ obvious; ALL news media is controlled by their owners, the State, and influenced by vested interest groups and huge overseas commercial global organizations all who are directly or indirectly in the process of shaping “Future Man” 

Although purporting to be non-political in a sense that we understand them, they are Global. It is after the election that repayments for these generous levels of donations are called in. The worlds Media is controlled and sanitised to enable power to be kept in the hands of a very few people.

This is the way it has always been, it is called Western Democracy. Western Democracy and Capitalism are corrupt bedfellows, somewhat like a Parasite and its host, or a melanoma spawned from the cancer that gave it birth. The aim; initially in the western world is to remove the concept of Race and traditional sentiments of Nationalism.

On completion we will see the dawn of a new era, the birth of the “International Man”. Although it has been many decades in the planning in past history it has not always been so when regions on earth were defined by race, language and like-culture.

The Western Media is controlled no differently than the media reporting that is censored by Burmese Generals or by the Ruling Chinese Communist Party. In the UK it is more of a velvet glove approach, the major difference being the clever use of subliminal indoctrination propaganda used widely by the Western media, print and Television practised so skilfully and ruthlessly by our National Broadcaster.

For instance, there was deliberate news misinformation by omission of the ethnicity of the offender’s in mass Paedophile attacks and sexual grooming of over 1200 English schoolchildren in Rotherham as the outcry of the indigenous people would directly affect the continuing creation of the “International Man” 

Until we understand that Race does not exist in the eyes of the Globalist and why Islam initially was not mentioned, we will never understand what is taking place within Western society and how its people are being manipulated.

On the internet the true feelings of the many of the public is found in the Internet comments sections, comments which taken in isolation in the public arena would be considered racist, homophobic, islamophobic or utterances liable to alarm or offend and other varied forms of phobia many of which have not yet been collated.

Keeping these comments from the scrutiny of public debate and corralled in the depths of the Internet assures there will be a strict level on freedom of speech that kept within the boundaries of acceptable public free speech allowed by the government but importantly keeping it on the internet it is kept hidden by a deluge of the overdose of information, any damaging revelations of government skulduggery involved in the reshaping of Western society by the invitation of millions of foreign people from around the world is called a conspiracy and people are employed to trawl the internet looking for such revelations by whistle blowers and post accusations of conspiracies but at least on the Internet it is kept free from public scrutiny.

Anyone brave enough to challenge the suppression of free speech is attacking the fundamental bedrock of what the “New Order” is trying to achieve. These are not racism laws at all, they are laws purely concocted to further supress free speech and to silence the anguished cries of the people rejecting the planned creation of “Future Man” so far it is working very well, the people are terrified.

The Government is enacting laws specifically to combat what they perceive as rejection of their “New Order” using the law wrapped up a pretend veneer of morality they throw up their hands in a sickening display of disguised horror and righteous indignation and using accusations of a myriad of phobias and of supposed Racism and of inhumanity to ones fellow man, then invade their countries bomb and kill the civilians using depleted uranium to assure future generations pay for the sins of their fathers.

I was not sitting on a seat at the seaside in Skegness in the 1950’s I was sitting on a seat in a city centre voted as one of the three most liveable cities in the world, it was there where I saw the future. I saw “Future Man” I was not seeing a parade of a homogenous society parading before me, I was watching a Mish Mash of “Transnational Man” I rarely go into a large city so I found this quite disturbing.

I was also in a city I had not visited for over ten years. Of the people that passed me at times I counted one indigenous person in twelve, even then I could not be certain of what my eyes were showing me. I saw people I had only seen in Geographic Documentary programmes; people with Mongoloid features, possibly Han people from Eastern China, some could have been Karen people fleeing Burma and African tribal people, and many Orientals.

This parade would have been quite normal if I was in an occupied Socialist country of Europe, but I was not.

Globalisation which attempts to amalgamate every local, regional, and national economy into a single world system requires homogenising all the people on this earth. The European Union is just a very small cog in an enormous wheel. Diversification on a mammoth scale will hasten the emergence of “Global man”

We have already ceded London to the “International Man” but this was not London.

What was blindingly apparent was although these people were refugees from all parts of the world they only walked with their own tribe, an analogy not unlike Swallows that flock with other Swallows or Herons that do not flock with Sea Gulls even though these people were the “future international man” 

This herd cluster without doubt was due to the hundreds of years of tribal association and like-culture with one’s own kind which no amount of Social engineering can ever change. This is very apparent in many English cities and towns.

I realised the plan for a New Order was well under way and I suspect irreversible. For one who had passed his three score years and ten I was witnessing the birth of the Global Man and it has been painfully slow and insidious.

A simple question is how on earth do you remove from your country a potential enemy of around a guestimate of 6 Million disciples of Allah, whose culture is totally in opposition to ours? This is an overriding question which “Future International Man” will have to contend with.

I will finish by echoing the words of one of the Planners of the “New International Man” a Mr. Coudenhove Kalergi,

In his book Praktischer Idealismus, Kalergi indicates that the residents of the future "United States of Europe" will not be the People of the Old Continent, but a kind of sub-humans, products of miscegenation.

He clearly states that the peoples of Europe should interbreed with Asians and coloured races, thus creating a multinational flock with no quality and easily controlled by the ruling elite
.
(Miscegenation is alive and well but its “multi-national” stock” are not called Sub-humans but mixed race, it is politically correct as calling Homosexual deviates Gay or Rainbow people) It is Orwell’s world of Doublespeak.

and….. 

The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals.

This is Kalergi’s vision of YOUR future. But your future at election time is decided by you not by politicians or in Kalergi’s case, Marxist theorists.

 

The Church Bans the BNP

The Church of England bans the BNP

A Repost...I am forced to comment further on the blatant two-faced hypocrisy of the Church of England. Now I do not know what the true grounds they had for putting a ban on the BNP although my guess would be they used the tired old accusation of it being as a racist/white supremacist organization. Their quoted reason ‘Activities declared "incompatible" with Church teaching on race equality.’

True we do have race inequality in this country, the inequality is the discrimination against our race; the indigenous race is not equal to the other races that are colonizing our country. This reverse Racism we are experiencing has been accelerating since WW2. It became more apparent since immigration from the third world commenced and has increased on a mammoth scale.

For a moment let us remind ourselves of the saying ‘one swallow does not make a summer’. How many BNP supporters with racist tendencies does it take to make the BNP a racist organization? Does Islam see Christians as equal if not why not ban Islam and the building of Mosques in our country? Let me take this further if I may.

The Church, Roman Catholic Church and the Church of England clergy have for decades sexually abused children and many cases the senior clergy have either closed ranks or covered up this vile practise. Even Nuns were renowned for repeated physical abuse of children. I would like to refer to the ‘Lost Children’.

Children were sent to the four corners of the Empire, many were told their parents were dead when in fact they were alive, put onto farms in places like Australia and Canada and worked like slaves, and in many cases sexually violated. It was decades long institutionalized Paedophilia within the Clergy, and was covered up by senior bishops,  still with me?

So the question that is begging to be asked is how many Paedophile priests does it take to make the Catholic Church a hotbed of Paedophilia ‘Incompatible with general morality?’ 

The same applies the Church of England clergy. One could ask was it institutionalised within the Church as the accusation of Racism being institutional within the Police? 

If child sex abuse is not compatible with church teachings why it did flourish, and when it was discovered why was it covered up and the offending perverts transferred to other Diocese. The Catholic Church particularly has had to pay enormous sums in compensation for this abuse of children and is still paying it to this day.

Now I could say I find the Clergy’s behaviour quite incompatible with human morality and ‘incompatible with Church Teachings’ so should Churches be banned? Who judges the morals of the church, the robed closet perverts? Frankly all I see is blatant hypocrisy when the church pre-judges the BNP morality when they need to get their act cleaned up first before judging the ‘incompatibility’ of a legally constituted political party.

Maybe the C of E should be looking inward and rooting out their perverted transgressors. Incidentally I always thought there was separation between the Church and the State, guess not.

There is a cancer at present that is running s right through our society, it involves the Elite, the Police Hierarchy plus the departments from where their orders emanate. The MSN, print and TV, the CPS, the Clergy, the educators, foreign-born Negro immigrants in token positions in local government and Westminster for political expediency and thousands of special ethnic interests groups, Government incompetence and local council corruption involving of conflicts of interest

Our enemy is a Cancer that is eating away at a once homogenous stable, civilised, cohesive society where a person identified strongly with his fellow man and freedom of speech was not something the government decided on the degree of freedom allowed, our birth-right is something that is acquired or inherited at birth, It is not given out freely to the third world poor on arriving at Heathrow Airport and automatically makes them British whatever the Government might tell them. 

I repeat Birthright refers to something that is acquired or inherited at birth.

Our Birth-right goes hand in hand with Nation-hood. What is nationhood? It is a community of persons not necessarily constituting a state but bound by common descent, language and history. Nationhood shouldn't be dictated or manipulated by a few, but in today’s Great Britain it is being systematically being destroyed for a purpose our people have yet to understand

It is almost like an elite club which not everyone can join, particularly loyal patriots who are not welcome in this New World in the making. Should I worry? No morally bankrupt despotic system lasts forever however democratic it appears on the surface.

To the clergy might I suggest a little more attention to your bible might not go astray, "he who is without sin among you let him cast the first stone"

Midsomer Revisited.

Midsomer Revisited

There is no debate, argument or discussion; the change in the demographics of the countries of the West is meticulously well planned and deliberate. The degree is apparent when Programs on ITV and BBC are now written to reflect the unwanted diversity of peoples that reflect the lowest depths that ‘modern’ England has is now sunk. We are invited to immerse ourselves totally in an unashamed bacchanalian orgy of unabashed indulgence in Multiculturism, ethnic harmony and racial understanding. But who the hell asked for this change, a Mr Keith Vaz seems to think this make us a Modern Britain? I will get to that revolting alien creature later.

I have commented before and it is essential to understand the sole purpose of deliberately inviting an overwhelming multitude of foreign cultures and people of non-European ethnicity to populate Europe and the UK was for over time create a perception there is no discernible native ethnic grouping, it is more than just a perception it is the cornerstone to achieve a single totalitarian Europe bereft of Nationhood and identity.

If Coudenhove Kalergi plan comes to fruition then the man of the future Europe will be hybrid or a person of mixed race. Diversity and Political Correctness are methods used to describe the tools of destruction used to destroy the homogeneity of people, it could be tribes it could be nations.

Kalergi said “In time the races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals.”

Alternately if that is not the case then there could only be one or more of three reasons for the deliberate, unsustainable numbers of migrants encouraged to migrate to Europe. One; Europe’s economies were in such poor shape after WW2 more people were in demand to kick-start the economies. Two; the more people looking for work meant they would have accept coolie wages which suited big business and race was never an issue and lastly the population was getting older result less people working to pay pensions for the aged, at the time Islam was never factored in, but nevertheless over time Nation States will cease to exist, they were seen as a dinosaur of yesteryear.

No, I suggest the Third World is not being targeted for demographic change it is ONLY the WEST. This political interference into TV program content has nothing to do with showcasing and embracing our ‘Rich’ diversity it is being done to subliminally instil the perception in people’s minds this country has ceased to be the homeland of White indigenous people.

I apologise if anyone takes offence for my mentioning of skin colour. England is the ancestral home of the Angles and Saxons and people of Northern Europe and they do not want to be overwhelmed by Africans or people of the coconut islands of the Caribbean and beyond. Showcasing our rich diversity in the New Midsomer Murders could easily mirror modern day Slough, Dewsbury, Newham or a host of other English towns.

Midsomer is NOT a TV show about a ‘quintessential African’ village or a village on the Pakistani/Afghanistan border it was about ENGLISH people, ENGLISH Villages and the ENGLISH way of life, this was before the cultural Marxist realised that the programme had no Multi-hued or Non English actors in the cast, it could not be allowed to continue in this vein.

A strange anomaly was found that ethnic minorities apparently avoid this show. A study in 2006 found that Midsomer Murders was "strikingly unpopular" with minorities. Removing the ‘Quintessentially Englishness’ of the show for political expediency I think ITV will now find that indigenous people will also avoid watching this masterpiece of demographic engineering like the plague,

Food for thought, in Midsomer there has been on today’s count 51 deaths, 222 of which were murders, but this figure changes by the day as the American debt changes by the second. To date not one murder was committed by a Black person that is a plus surely. Will ITV ever show a murder commited by a black in the new Midsomer Murders with the new format I doubt it, you see that is considered racial profiling and thus racist but nevertheless totally irrelevant to the numbers of these people in our jails. It really highlights the comic absurdity of this show and others just for the sake of political correctness.

At the time Labour a MP Keith Vaz, chairman of his party’s “Ethnic Minority Taskforce” whatever that, is a penniless refugee from Aden whose parents were poor Indians from Goa said: ‘I am appalled at Mr True-May’s comments after he said he said he did not use black and Asian people in the series because ‘it wouldn’t be an English village with them’. This Vaz person standing on his hind legs pontificating that the decision to exclude ethnic minorities from Midsomer Murders not only misrepresents modern Britain, but also dismisses ‘the valuable role ethnic minority’s play in enriching our country.’ Omitting to say that parts of Modern Britain resemble Third World  cess-pits.

It highlights the dumb, pig-ignorance of this parasitic foreigner not to understand the show had nothing whatsoever to do with race or showcasing “the valuable role ethnic minority’s play in enriching OUR country.” whose country? This creature’s country is India. Midsomer Murders was about a quintessentially English village as Bollywood films are quintessentially about India and as the Follies Bergère is quintessentially French. If the commentator is black the discussion always defaults to race, what’s the matter with these people? I smell a fundamental lack of self-esteem.

I would say his position of chairman of the Labours party’s Ethnic Minority Taskforce was won purely on the fact that his black skin colour was wholly and solely the essential obligatory requirement for his position, a position not afforded to a white person; Bloody hypocrite.

It was pointed out that in Midsomer there have been a few blacks in the show over the years but only in very minor roles. I suggest if the ITV wanted an African theme then that maybe they should have dispensed with Barnaby and Jones altogether replacing them with a couple of Zulus, Hutus or even Hottentots and construct a back-lot with African village huts and rewrite the script, that should at least please Vaz. The problem is Midsomer would then really begin to resemble Slough or a dozen or more other ‘English’ towns.

Back to TV programming, I do not believe it is simple case of the ITV taking upon itself to make these changes; the order comes from much higher it is more than coincidence that this idiocy is rampant right across the sick mainstream media. I can understand John Nettles leaving the show after it was forced to use a variegated or multi-hued-cast.

By the same token I can understand how the Catholic Bishops would feel if the Vatican demanded that the new Pope’s job be given to a African women with a huge lower lip implant and a bone through her nose purely for the sake of inclusivity to visually embrace the church’s rich multi-racial diversity.

This idiocy has to stop somewhere and the boardrooms of the BBC and ITV might be a good place to start. I expect to read of a Negro actor who got his acting break on Downton Abbey, Upstairs Downstairs, Midsomer Murders or Grantchester but the day I read of a white actor getting his acting break on a ‘quintessentially Black’ show is when it is discovered that Santa Claus is a real person after all.

I sometimes wonder if a group of faceless people are intending over time planning to wipe all traces of Caucasian people from the history books.

I want to use the words of a conversation by two very famous men. They describe accurately the true meaning of Political Correctness.

A DEFINITION OF THE TERM "POLITICAL CORRECTNESS, EXPERTLY DEFINED.

For the last six odd years, almost all of the things I wanted to write or say, have been stymied by a recently coined term referred to as "POLITICAL CORRECTNESS"! Although I consider myself rather fluent in the English language, that term was not in my vocabulary. My curiosity got the best of me and I decided to do a little research and after two weeks of chasing fruitless leads, I found what I'd been looking for at the Truman Library and Museum in Independence Missouri. An unnamed source there sent me copies of four telegrams that were between Harry Truman and Douglas MacArthur on the day before the actual signing of the Surrender Agreement.

The contents of those four telegrams below are exactly as received, not a word has been added or deleted!

(1) Tokyo, Japan
0800-September 1,1945
From: General D A MacArthur
To: President Harry S. Truman

Tomorrow we meet with those yellow bellied bastards and sign the Surrender Documents, any last minute instructions!

2) Washington, D C
1300-September 1, 1945
To: D A MacArthur
From: H S Truman

Congratulations, job well done, but you must tone down your obvious dislike of the Japanese when discussing the terms of the surrender with the press, because some of your remarks are fundamentally not politically correct!

(3) Tokyo, Japan
1630-September 1, 1945
To: H S Truman
From: D A MacArthur and C H Nimitz

Wilco Sir, but both Chester and I are somewhat confused, exactly what does the term politically correct mean?

(4) Washington, D C
2120-September 1, 1945
To: D A MacArthur/C H Nimitz
From: H S Truman

Political Correctness is a doctrine, recently fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and promoted by a sick mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a piece of SHIT by the clean end! 

……….. I wish that explanation was attributed to me. PS. “Vibrant Diversity” is another, meaningless, empty description put about by the sick mainstream media.

What is Sovereignty?

What is Sovereignty?

Sovereignty, the authority of a State or

Nation to govern itself.

Sovereignty is understood in jurisprudence as the full right and power of a governing body to govern itself without any interference from outside sources or bodies. In political theory, sovereignty is a substantive term designating supreme authority. So why does the UK take orders from Brussels?

Sovereignty, Constitution, self-rule, who gave ours away to a European consortium?

Russia's president Vladimir Putin says his country would consider making loans to Greece if the two countries move forward on joint energy projects. 

This news would not have been received warmly by the silk suited bureaucrats in Das Kapital as Greece is within THEIR sphere of influence and it is Brussels who decides who gets loans from European Banks and the IMF within the occupied satellite countries of Europe, not Russia. The Greek Prime Minister said "Greece is a sovereign country that over the past years has been facing a difficult economic situation," a rich, masterpiece of understatement.

I could not help but notice the dreaded EU flag behind Putin and the Greek prime Minister during the photo shoot. Was Mr Putin paying tacit homage to the fact that Greece was one of the EU’s renegade territories, a satellite country that had the temerity to venture outside of the EU’s jurisdiction begging for loans?

The question is, like the United Kingdom IS Greece a sovereign nation? I am not sure about the sovereignty bit; I know we certainly used to have a constitution. Both the UK and Greece accepted and signed the EU Draft constitution cleverly disguised under the name of the Lisbon Treaty which takes precedence over their own constitutions. If a county had its own constitution it would have its own laws and it would have control over its borders surely. No, we have lost an Empire, lost self-rule and signed up to some-else’s constitution. Something smells here. Sovereignty, Constitutions, Royal Family?

Our own German Royal family, the Battenberg’s, whose 240 bedroomed house is exempt from the bedroom tax has more to do with Lilliputian characters putting on a show for the peasantry, for the adoring people waving their little flags. I admit it does encourage tourism and offers the adoring herd bread and circuses. They get a chance to see people just like them but wearing uniforms of Admiral of the Fleet and Colonels, dripping with gold braid and medals. It may have been acceptable in Richard the First time but we have moved on.

Voyager has left our Solar System and has headed into the unknown; we are sending probes to mars and still a man calling himself Black Adder (rod) whose jolly fun job is to wear a silly suit and hammer on a door in Parliament demanding entry to the House. His day job, or rather official duties also include responsibility as the usher and doorkeeper and to make sure blown light bulbs and broken chairs are replaced and maintenance is up to scratch. I put the hammering on doors in Parliament equal in entertainment value to “I am a celebrity get me outta here” I sometimes wonder if I am a character in some-one else’s dream, or nightmare perhaps.

Who else was a Lilliputian? Well it was Field Marshal Douglas Haig, 1st Earl Haig, KT, GCB, OM, GCVO, KCIE, ADC who having the dubious honour of being one of the most stupid of Generals Great Britain had ever given birth and was responsible for the magnitude of the battle of the Somme which still stuns the imagination.

The Somme was an epic of both slaughter and futility; a profligate waste of men and materiel such as the world had never seen. On the morning of July 1, 1916, 110,000 British infantrymen went "over the top." In a few hours, 60,000 of them were casualties. Nearly 20,000 of these were either dead already or would die of their wounds, many of them lingering for days between the trenches, in no man's land. The attacking forces did not gain a single one of their objectives.

It does not end there I’m afraid, on the day after the debacle, Haig, this fool of a man stated that the enemy "has undoubtedly been shaken and has few reserves in hand," he discussed with subordinates methods for continuing the offensive. It was going to be a war of attrition until every last British soldier was killed or wounded. You might wonder how as a General of his ilk lived to the age of 69, keeping his head down and avoiding the machine-Gun bullets helped.

Haig's army had suffered more than 400,000 casualties. For the British, in the grave judgment of noted military historian John Keegan, "the battle was the greatest tragedy…of their national military history" and "marked the end of an age of vital optimism in British life that has never been recovered."

If it is of any consolation at the end of the next war of any substance there will not be a body count of the dead but a body count of the living. My question was not answered. Are we a Sovereign Nation if we do not have supreme authority of a state or Nation to govern itself? The simple reason is we do not have full authority to govern ourselves because we are hampered by treaties we have signed with foreign countries.

So have we been left with part Sovereignty If so where or when did the treason occur and who was responsible? Last question is why these are Lilliputian people still in power and standing before you as candidates in the next General Election as our next Prime Minister, haven’t they done enough damage to the country already?